Abstract This study compares the primary teachers' job satisfaction District 4 Tabriz based on power bases deals with school principals. In terms of purpose, applied research, in terms of research methods, descriptive survey, and the method of data collection is field.
More
Abstract This study compares the primary teachers' job satisfaction District 4 Tabriz based on power bases deals with school principals. In terms of purpose, applied research, in terms of research methods, descriptive survey, and the method of data collection is field. The statistical population included all primary teachers Department of Education District 4 Tabriz is 701 the number of persons. To determine the sample size, Morgan table was used that was equal to 248 and for the selection of respondents, the simple random sampling method was used. Of the 248 questionnaires distributed, 239 were returned completed questionnaires and analysis was performed based on them. To collect the required data, Minnesota job satisfaction questionnaire and hinkin and schriesheim power bases questionnaire were used. SPSS software for data analysis and one-way analysis of variance was used. The result show that job satisfaction average of teachers is different based on school principal’s different bases of power. LSD test results showed that the mean difference in job satisfaction rewarded with an average job satisfaction based on expert power source is different. The average job satisfaction based on coercion power supply with power supplies and specialized law differently. Average job satisfaction, according to a power law with an average job satisfaction based on source power supply authority is different but not different with other sources. The result is another clear difference of job satisfaction based on power supply authority and expertise
Manuscript profile
