This Research is about the relationship between lifestyle, economic capital and cultural capital among students’ procrastination. The purpose of the study was applied and the method was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population consisted of all student More
This Research is about the relationship between lifestyle, economic capital and cultural capital among students’ procrastination. The purpose of the study was applied and the method was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population consisted of all students in 2019 entrance year who totaled to 200 individuals. A total of 132 students were recruited as the sample by using krejcie and Morgan’s Table via simple random sampling. Roth Bloom et al.’s (1984) procrastination questionnaire, lifestyle and economic capital questionnaire (researcher-made), and cultural capital questionnaire (researcher-made) were applied as instruments in this research. Data were analyzed by using Pearson correlation and multiple regression. Results showed that lifestyle has a negative and significant relationship with students’ procrastination, and cultural capital and economic capital have a positive and significant relationship with procrastination (P<0.05). The results indicate that cultural capital variance with 0.32 Beta coefficient and variance of economic capital with 0.27 residual coefficient affirmatively and significantly, beside lifestyle variance with 0.22 Beta coefficient negatively and significantly predicted procrastination among students.
Manuscript profile
