In the Journal of Knowledge Studies, only research and review articles (articles with new content) are accepted.
The First, the article is received by the manager and is reviewed in terms of scientific structure and writing style during one to two days after receipt.
The next step in the Board of Chief Editor is reviewed from a thematic and scientific point of view and the names of the judges will be determined during one day.
Then the article is judged by two reviewers.The judgment method is “Double blind peer review”. Judging is done within a month to 50 days. As a result of judging, there are three possibilities:
The First: If two reviewers have accepted the article, The article and the opinions of the reviewers will be presented at the editorial board meeting.
The Second: If one of the reviewers accepted the article and one reviewer did not, the article will be sent to the third reviewer. In case of acceptance of the third reviewer, the article and the opinions of its reviewers will be presented in the editorial board meeting.
The third: If two reviewers reject the article, the letter of rejection will be sent to the author.
Then, in the editorial board meeting, the article and the opinions of the judges are reviewed again, and finally, the point of view of the members of the editorial board with the opinions of the judges is sent to the author.
After, do the corrections, the article is sent to a reviewer for re-evaluation. The author has two times to correct her article after being re-evaluated by the reviewer.
After the author's corrections were approved by the reviewer. The author must submit a confirmation file of less than 20% similarity through the journal website. To do this, it can use similarity detection software such as Hamanand Joe, Samim Noor and Hamyab.
Finally, the article is sent to the Board of Chief Editor for final approval and appointment published.
It is noteworthy that the article can be rejected in the Board of Chief Editor, Preliminary judgment and Judgment to evaluate reforms
