Evaluation Process

Evaluation Process

All manuscripts submitted to MMSELT undergo a double-blind peer review prior to publication.

1. Acknowledgment & Initial Screening

   • Upon submission, the corresponding author will receive an acknowledgment of receipt.

   • The editorial office performs an initial in-house screening. Manuscripts that clearly fall outside the scope of the journal will be rejected immediately, and the authors will be advised to submit elsewhere.

2. Peer Review

   • Manuscripts that meet the submission guidelines are sent for review to three independent reviewers, at least one of whom is an associate professor or equivalent expert in the field.

   • Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the process.

   • Reviewers provide constructive feedback to assist authors in revising their manuscripts and preparing future submissions.

3. Timeline and Acceptance Rate

   • The peer-review process typically takes approximately six months, depending on the extent of revisions required.

   • Roughly 30% of submitted manuscripts are accepted for publication.

4. Editorial Decisions
   After completing the review process, authors may receive one of the following decisions:

   • Accept as submitted

   • Minor revision required

   • Major revision required

   • Reject

The peer-review process is considered complete when all reviewers have submitted their evaluations, including comments and recommendations.

Online ISSN: 3060-5989