The media are responsible for protecting the privacy of individuals, and in case of violation and damage to individuals, they must compensate for the damage. Damages caused by privacy are often spiritual and non-material, and it is not possible to completely restore the
More
The media are responsible for protecting the privacy of individuals, and in case of violation and damage to individuals, they must compensate for the damage. Damages caused by privacy are often spiritual and non-material, and it is not possible to completely restore the previous situation. The aim of the current research is to compensate the media from several private systems in the laws of Iran and England, which was done using the document-library method. The research findings showed that In Iran's laws, protection of privacy is used to protect individuals against defamation, dignity and property, but there are still many challenges in protecting privacy and personal data. In the English legal system, privacy does not have a single validity. The records in the legal system of this country show that in some cases the court has considered compensation for the violation of privacy. But in this country there is no explicit guarantee for the right to privacy. The general approach of English law is based on the predominance of privacy protection in the form of quasi-crime and the obligation to compensate for damages and refer to other civil wrongs. However, compared to Iran, England's supportive approach is far more favorable than Iran in some aspects, especially the privacy of communications, information and data
Manuscript profile