• Home
  • mahbobeh esmaeili
  • Published Issues

    OpenAccess
    • List of Articles mahbobeh esmaeili

      • Open Access Article

        1 - The process of Islam entering Hamadan in the first century AH
        behrooz sadeghi sayah hassan shadpoor mahboobeh esmaeili
        Hamadan, as one of the oldest cities in Iran, and the center of the Median state, which undoubtedly has been the "heart of Iran" in popular thought since the Achaemenid era in terms of geography. In the late Sassanid era, it was easily subjected to invasion, and with it More
        Hamadan, as one of the oldest cities in Iran, and the center of the Median state, which undoubtedly has been the "heart of Iran" in popular thought since the Achaemenid era in terms of geography. In the late Sassanid era, it was easily subjected to invasion, and with its conquest by the Muslims, Islam came to this city. This study attempts to examine the process of forced or compulsory entry of Islam into the city of Hamadan and attempts to reject the theory of forced acceptance of Islam by Hamadan people on the one hand and to criticize the idea of easy acceptance of Islam by Hamadan people. This study examines the following: (a) The people of Hamadan have shown strong resistance to the Arabs, but this does not mean that Islam has also been forced into the Hamadan culture. B) The Islamisation of the Hamadans has not been rational and deliberate everywhere, but other psychological, social, economic and political factors have also influenced their Islamization. C) Adoption of Islam did not necessarily mean acceptance of Arab culture, but the core of Islam as a text (Qur'an) penetrated among the Hamadans, and they were able to understand this revelation, and finally to fit it with their human possessions and to mix it with the truth. Heavenly Islam, cultural objectification. heavenly truth of Islam a cultural object. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - A Study of the View of Muslim (Shia and Sunni) Historians to the Salafi Thought System from the Fourth to the Eighth Century AH
        malihe ghanadian mahboobeh esmaeili mirza mohammad hassani
        Salafis are people who have tried to make other Muslims look down on the Shiites by slandering the Shiites.Not only do they consider the Shiites outside the religion of Islam, but they also accuse the Shiites of distorting the Holy Quran and the Book of God. Muslim hist More
        Salafis are people who have tried to make other Muslims look down on the Shiites by slandering the Shiites.Not only do they consider the Shiites outside the religion of Islam, but they also accuse the Shiites of distorting the Holy Quran and the Book of God. Muslim historians, scholars, and Islamic thinkers have left many books, articles, and works in the words of the Salafis, especially Ibn Taymiyyah and his students.This article tries to expose the accusations of Salafis against Shiism and also examines the views of historians, thinkers, Islamic scholars and Muslim scholars (Shia and Sunni) in the Salafi approach to the three principles of religion, monotheism, prophecy and imamate.The main issue is what are the opinions and thoughts of Muslim scholars and thinkers on the principles of monotheism, prophethood and Imamate with a Salafi approach? This research is a descriptive-analytical method.But what the author intends is to rely on the views and ideas of Shiite and Sunni Muslim historians in the Salafi approach to monotheism, prophecy and Imamate.Keywords: Salafism, monotheism, prophethood, Imamate, Muslim scholars Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - Areas of tolerance of Samanids with Ismailis
        mohammad najafi hasan shadpoor mahbobeh esmaeili
        The Ismailis who have been given various names are an extension of the Shiite religion and believe Ismael and his son are righteous for Imamate after Imam Jafar Sadegh. Through its ups and downs, this dynasty had interactions and confrontations with the incumbent govern More
        The Ismailis who have been given various names are an extension of the Shiite religion and believe Ismael and his son are righteous for Imamate after Imam Jafar Sadegh. Through its ups and downs, this dynasty had interactions and confrontations with the incumbent governments among which their interaction with the Samanid, as one of the most Iranian government of the history, is significantly important. Therefore, based on the necessity of explaining and recognizing the history of the Samanids and the type of their interaction with the Ismailis, in this descriptive-analytical study, we will examine the most important social contexts of the Samanids' tolerance of the Ismailis and explain its consequences. In addition, rooting out the causes and factors of the Ismaili's influence and expansion, especially among the Samanids and the role and policies of the political and cultural leaders of the two sides in the results of these ups and downs, is another case that this study intends to explain. The results of this study indicated that areas like the Iranian origin of the Samanids, their open religious policy, the influence of Shiite ideas on the Samanid rulers and the relative economic, social and security stability in Khorasan and Transoxiana were among the factors that paved the way for positive Samanid interaction with the Ismailis which , in consequence, made the Ismailis able to take advantage of this opportunity to succeed in their invitation and to expand the realm of their invitation. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - Factors of Conflict Between The Ismailis And The Seljuks: Results and Outcomes
        mohammad najafi hasan shadpoor mahbibeh esmaeili
        The main opposition of the Ismailis' government and thought were the Abbasid Caliphate and the Seljuk monarchy. The Ismailis didn't stop to react and utilized any opportunity to harm them, especially the Seljuk government which was accessible for the Ismailis. The outco More
        The main opposition of the Ismailis' government and thought were the Abbasid Caliphate and the Seljuk monarchy. The Ismailis didn't stop to react and utilized any opportunity to harm them, especially the Seljuk government which was accessible for the Ismailis. The outcome of such conflict was confrontation, positions based on conflict a between the Ismailis and the Seljuks. Thus, studying the background of this continuous and pervasive conflict is an undeniable necessity which will reveal a part of Iran's political and intellectual history. Therefore, the current research investigates the Ismailis movement and its ties and conflict with the Seljuk government by using an analytical- descriptive method. Also, their positions will be studied in different viewpoints. The results of the current research indicated that the relationship of the big Sunni government of the Seljuks with the Ismailis was established as based on the attitude of jurisprudence school of the Sunni scholars. In addition, the lack of a peaceful solution to express dissatisfaction was one of the main reasons for the violence of the Ismaili sect and its conflict with the Seljuk government, the most important result and consequence of which was the radicalization of the political atmosphere and the Ismailis' resorting to terror. The opposite point of this situation was the neglect of the opportunity for dialogue, the use of force to suppress the opposition and the application of social, political, religious and cultural pressures, discrimination and social restrictions by the Seljuks. Manuscript profile