Probing Language Teacher Accountability in Utilizing Self-developed Language Teaching Resources
Subject Areas : Research in English Language PedagogyMarjan Vosoughi 1 , Mahshid Hosseini 2 , Maryam Parsaian 3
1 - Young Researchers and Elite Club, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran
2 - English Department, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran
3 - English Department, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran
Keywords: Self-developed resources, Teacher autonomy, Teacher agency, accountability,
Abstract :
This study was aimed at recognizing constraints on the way of some Iranian language teachers' utilization of self-developed, localized, English language teaching resources. To this aim, three sets of teacher variables on pedagogical and personal accounts were examined including Language teachers' experience (novice/experienced), their educational level (BA/MA/PhD) and their gender. Data were collected in two phases. In the first phase, through stratified sampling, some eighty-three volunteering, English language teachers (Male and Female), who were indulged in the Iranian Ministry of Education (MoE), university settings (public and private) and language institutes were randomly selected. Teachers’ responses to a validated researcher-made questionnaire on language teacher curriculum autonomy revealed an overall significant Multiple R with F (3, 80) =.88, (0.04) but each individual above-cited predictors could not significantly predict teacher curriculum autonomy score. In the second phase for triangulation aims, three above-cited teacher variables were mapped over the insights gained through written interview sessions with some fourteen English language teachers. Language teachers' self-reported 'challenges' and 'opportunities' for using self-developed language teaching resources for class use were content analyzed. It became evident that teaching experience was mystified in some respects in terms of its influence over interviewed teachers since diverse intentions on the part of the language teachers in this research might have deterred them not to use their full potential over using their own materials in class. Possible reasons for this situation have been fully discussed in the end.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397-413.
Balcikanli, C. (2008). Fostering learner autonomy in EFL classrooms. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(1), 277-284.
Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer, 16.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
Benson, P. (2006). Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning. Dublin: Authentik.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Castro, F. M. P. (2016). School based curriculum: a potential alternative to innovate the ELT curriculum in Mexican higher education institutions.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33.
Fei, X. (2002). Learner autonomy and its cultivation in EFL learners [J]. Foreign Language World, 6, 26-29.
Friedman, I. A. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76.
Frostenson, M. (2015). Three forms of professional autonomy: de-professionalisation of teachers in a new light. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(2).
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The Roles of Agency and Context, 49. Multilingual Matters.
Grossman, P. & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014-2026.
Gremmo, M. J., & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23(2), 151-164.
Hoppers, H.M.L. (1998). Teachers' resource centers in Southern Africa; An investigation into local autonomy and educational change. Educational Development, 18(3), 229-246.
Johansson, T., & Kroksmark, T. (2004). Teachers' intuition-in-action: how teachers experience action. Reflective Practice, 5(3), 357-381.
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2015). Teacher agency, positioning, and English language learners: Voices of pre-service classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 94-103.
Khezerlou, E. (2014). A cross-cultural study of teacher autonomy in curriculum development among Iranian and Turkish EFL teachers. JALDA, 2(1), 25-38.
Kirkgoz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations. RELC journal, 38(2), 216-228.
Lantolf, J.P. & Poehner, M.E. (Eds.) (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages, London: Equinox.
LaCoe, C. S. (2008). Teacher autonomy: A multifaceted approach for the new millennium. NewYork: Cambria Press.
Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). Professional work and knowledge. In International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 79-106). Springer Netherlands.
Najeeb, S. S. (2013). Learner autonomy in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1238-1242.
Noormohammadi, S. (2014). Teacher reflection and its relation to teacher efficacy and autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1380-1389.
Parsaiyan, F., Ghahremani Ghajar, S., Salahimoghaddam, S., and Janahmadi, F. (2014). You Give Me Thousand Green Breathings”: Crafting Literary Arts in English Language Classroom. Teaching and Learning 28(2), 49-61.
Peralta Castro, F. M. (2016). School Based Curriculum: A Potential Alternative to Innovate the ELT Curriculum in Mexican Higher Education Institutions. MEXTESOL Journal, 40(4), 1-9.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardre, P., & Omura, M. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26(3), 183-207.
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175.
Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42, 237-246.
Short, P. M., & Greer, J. T. (1993). Empowering students: Variables impacting the effort. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Houston, TX.
Smylie, M. A., Lazarus, V., & Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1996). Instructional outcomes of school-based participative decision making. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 181-198.
Tilfarlioglu, F. Y., & Ciftci, F. S. (2011). Supporting self-efficacy and learner autonomy in relation to academic success in EFL classrooms (a case study). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1284-1294.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Pearsons.
Tehrani, Akbarpour. A., & Wan Mansor, F. A. W. (2012). The Influence of ‘Teacher Autonomy in Obtaining Knowledge’on ‘Class Practice’. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 544-554.