List of Articles Khwarazm

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - The Religious Politics of Khwarazm-Shahs
  ابراهیم باوفا
  Khwarazm-Shahs (491-618 A.H.) who were of Turkish origin,established a state in Khwarazm during Seljuk's declination andfragmentation. This dynasty, regarding their adoption of a theologicaland religious policy to protect Shiites and Mu‘tazilites, created ahistori More

  Khwarazm-Shahs (491-618 A.H.) who were of Turkish origin,established a state in Khwarazm during Seljuk's declination andfragmentation. This dynasty, regarding their adoption of a theologicaland religious policy to protect Shiites and Mu‘tazilites, created ahistorical opportunity and an appropriate background for thedevelopment of their doctrines in Khwarazm, and particularly theirinfiltration of Khwarazm -Shahs’ power system, administrativepositions and chancellor establishments. Examining Khwarazm -Shahs’ political intentions, this article is to recognize the role of thekings of this dynasty in creating necessary backgrounds for thedevelopment of intellectual courses, and also their special attention toMu‘tazilits’ beliefs and their protection of Shiites and Alawids againstAbbasids. (F.S.) Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Ministry Chancery and Its Role in Khwarazm-Shahs Administrative System
  ابراهیم باوفای دلیوند
  Advancing their purposes, Khwarazm-Shahs (491-628A.H.)created an administrative system in which Ministry Chancerywas the intersection of king and other chanceries. Minister asthe head of all chanceries, Was the 2nd authority after the king.Ministers with different chara More

  Advancing their purposes, Khwarazm-Shahs (491-628A.H.)created an administrative system in which Ministry Chancerywas the intersection of king and other chanceries. Minister asthe head of all chanceries, Was the 2nd authority after the king.Ministers with different characteristics, and abilities managedkhwarazm-Shahs administrative system. Some of the latterministers misused public funds to become wealthy, and this ledthe administrative and governmental system to decline. Thisarticle is to consider the ministry chancery and its role inKhwarazm-Shahs administrative system. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - A Review on Reflection of Iranian Clans' Overthrow - the Saffarids, Al-e Farigun, Sharan Gharjistan and the Khwarazmians - in the Works of the Ghaznavid Dynasty's Poets and Historians
  Zohreh Nooraeenia Hassan Akbari Bairagh
  The emergence of Iran's first Turk establishment was realized by Mahmud of Ghazni and it set the stage for formation of other Turk establishments in Iran. Following his expansionist objectives, Mahmud of Ghazni wiped off a number of Iran's local clans from historical an More

  The emergence of Iran's first Turk establishment was realized by Mahmud of Ghazni and it set the stage for formation of other Turk establishments in Iran. Following his expansionist objectives, Mahmud of Ghazni wiped off a number of Iran's local clans from historical and political geography of Iran. Emirates like the Saffarids, Sharan Gharjistan, Al-e Farigun and the Khwarazmians were among the clans whose overthrow was aimed at fulfilling the expansionist ends of the Ghaznavid king. This is the basic question that lies here: Is it possible to reach an authentic report about this case through contrast and comparison of the works of the Ghaznavid’s poets and historicans? In this research, which has been done by an expository-analytical method in line with Iran’s local historical studies, the authors have tried to exactly analyze these events with the help of the poets’ poetry and after corresponding them with the viewpoints of historians,  compare their reflections through the eyes of the two groups Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - Relations between Khanate of khiva with central state of Iran from deline of Safavids to death of Nader shah( 1135-1160)
  mohsen rahmati
  The oasis of khwarazm, having native rulers( called khwarazm shahs) and enjoying domestic independence, has always been politically a part of Iran. But in begining 10th century, it was dominated by Arabshahids, a clan descendant of Juchi. They could so founded khanate o More

  The oasis of khwarazm, having native rulers( called khwarazm shahs) and enjoying domestic independence, has always been politically a part of Iran. But in begining 10th century, it was dominated by Arabshahids, a clan descendant of Juchi. They could so founded khanate of khiva by emphasis on inheritance of their ancestor, nomadic force, deep-rooted of orthodox religion, to agree that religion theme with that belong to them. They, eventually,were being under protection of Safavid state, that was trying to hold territorial integrity of Iran. In begining 12th century, Arabshaid rule declined. The Weakness of Safavid state were prevented them to be active in this event, and shortly after they Fell time. Consequently, the political unity and domestic security of Iran ruined and so it raised competition for power among political leaders and military commandars from the four – corners of the country. Finally Nadir shah could renew political unity of country, after two decades. This article, after all, intends to not only have an eye upon the political upheavals of khwarazm, in interval period, but to examine the efforts of Nadir shah . on renewing dominance of Iran on khwarazm and reactions of rulers of that area on this matter or in more precisely to exmcline the development and the quality of the relationship between rulers of that area and Afsharid dynasty.  Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  5 - Relations between Khanate of khiva with central state of Iran from deline of Safavids to death of Nader shah( 1135-1160)
  Mohsen Rahmati
  The oasis of khwarazm, having native rulers( called khwarazm shahs)and enjoying domestic independence, has always been politically a partof Iran. But in begining 10th century, it was dominated by Arabshahids, aclan descendant of Juchi. They could so founded khanate of k More

  The oasis of khwarazm, having native rulers( called khwarazm shahs)and enjoying domestic independence, has always been politically a partof Iran. But in begining 10th century, it was dominated by Arabshahids, aclan descendant of Juchi. They could so founded khanate of khiva byemphasis on inheritance of their ancestor, nomadic force, deep-rooted oforthodox religion, to agree that religion theme with that belong to them.They, eventually,were being under protection of Safavid state, that wastrying to hold territorial integrity of Iran. In begining 12th century,Arabshaid rule declined. The Weakness of Safavid state were preventedthem to be active in this event, and shortly after they Fell time.Consequently, the political unity and domestic security of Iran ruined andso it raised competition for power among political leaders and militarycommandars from the four – corners of the country. Finally Nadir shahcould renew political unity of country, after two decades.This article, after all, intends to not only have an eye upon the politicalupheavals of khwarazm, in interval period, but to examine the efforts ofNadir shah . on renewing dominance of Iran on khwarazm and reactionsof rulers of that area on this matter or in more precisely to exmcline thedevelopment and the quality of the relationship between rulers of thatarea and Afsharid dynasty. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  6 - Locating the Last squares battle of Sultan Muhammad Khwarazmshah with the Mongol
  hasanreza rafiei
  The Final days of the King Mohammed Khwarazmshah were one of the bitterest ends of human life that are hollow and empty shadow power to have happy life. He seeks to create territorial integrity of Iran during Sassanid rule that the local governments who over six centuri More

  The Final days of the King Mohammed Khwarazmshah were one of the bitterest ends of human life that are hollow and empty shadow power to have happy life. He seeks to create territorial integrity of Iran during Sassanid rule that the local governments who over six centuries after Islam ruled over parts of Iran. Such was the scope of his rule from southern Siberia and Turkestan and China's border and close to the center of the Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad continued. He had the power as the Caliph of Baghdad, the Mongol Genghis falling afraid and willing to communicate with him and a friend were with him. His imprudence effect based on pride and joy, anger Mongol Mongol ordered the killing of sharp businessmen and the country prosperous and noble people of Iran that their goal Sam Stover, a species that everything was destroyed. Its cash reserves and looted, killed children and women of Heram were captured by Mongols and were in the last days of his life until his body to be covered without any coffin. Since his last serious battle with the Mongols in the plains or meadows of DolatabadMalayer occurred. As the owner of this paper, we investigate the causes of the Mongols and locate the last stages of the life of King Mohammed Khwarazmshah including last battle he was in the plains of Malayer. Compiled using descriptive paper based library resources and results analysis method is content analysis. The main research question that this article seeks to answer is the issue is: What is the cause of Mongol invasion to Iran and Where have you been the last battle squares of Sultan Muhammad Khwarazmshah with the armies of the Mongol?   Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  7 - The role of Amir Timour Gurkani in Toghtameshs ups and downs, Khan Alos Joji
  Farah Talebeygi amirteymour rafiei Hassan Ghoreyshi
  Toghtamesh (778-793 AH / 1376-1391 AD) is the last famous and most powerful ruler in the history of the White and Zarrin Urdu. He sought refuge with Amir Timour as a result of internal strife in order to seize power and reign in the White Urdu. Amir Timour gave him the More

  Toghtamesh (778-793 AH / 1376-1391 AD) is the last famous and most powerful ruler in the history of the White and Zarrin Urdu. He sought refuge with Amir Timour as a result of internal strife in order to seize power and reign in the White Urdu. Amir Timour gave him the government of the Saqqaq provinces, by the Sihoun River. He was defeated twice by the White Urdu chief, Uros Khan, and the second time his hand was injured, forcing him to seek refuge with Amir Timour. This time, Amir Timour himself took action and began to break into the Eritrean and Lashkar-e-Lahang. In 777 AH while Amir Timour was planning to invade the Land of the White Urdu more aggressively, Orus Khan died suddenly and his successor died shortly thereafter. This paved the way for Amir Timour to reign Toghtamesh. Soon, Toghtamesh moved to the western Ghebchagh Plain and took over the town of Serai, the thone of the Khans of the Zarrin Urdu. He bridged the divition between the Khans of the White and Zarrin Urdu and brought the Eastern (White) and Western (Zarrin) Olos Ghebchagh under one government. Toghtamesh was proud of his accomplishments, and took the opposite course of his patron AmirTimour and acted daringly. Amir Taymour defeated Toghtamesh in two battles, one at the site of Ortepe (793 AH) and the other near the Turkish River (798 AH). In the end, after wandering for a long time, Toghtamesh passed away in 809 AH. Manuscript profile