Exploring Language Mindsets, Goal orientations, and Responses to Failure: Proficiency Level in Focus

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Forough Sadeghi ¹ ( Department of English Language, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran )
Firooz Sadighi ² ( Department of English Language, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran|University of Shiraz )
Mohammadsadegh Bagheri ³ ( Department of English Language, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran )

Received: 2021-02-22 Accepted : 2021-04-14 Published : 2021-11-01

Keywords: Proficiency, Language Mindsets, EFL Student, language learning, Responses to Failure, Goal Orientations,

Abstract :

The priming of different mindsets is expected to guide L2 students to pursue different achievement goals in language learning that direct them to respond differently in challenging situations.This study assessed a significant predictor variable(s) of goal orientation in mindset variables and a significant predictor variable(s) of responses to failure among mindsets and goal orientations.Thequestionnaires were distributed to 68 university students.Several semi-structured interviews with 10 university students were done.T-test, multiple hierarchical regression analyses,and thematic analysis was employed to analyze the data. The results showed a significant difference between high and low proficient students regarding mindset and goal orientation. It showed that their mindset positively predicted their goal orientation, furthermore, mindset and goal orientation positively predicted responses to failure. Results of interviews showed that language learning mindset could be improved by hardworking.It was concluded that L2 studnets who held a growth mindset became more proficient; they were inspired to learn more and held more learning goals. The study may have implications forsyllabus designers and material developers.

References:

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Bråten, I., & Olaussen, B. S. (1998). The relationship between motivational beliefs and learning strategy use among Norwegian college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0963

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003

Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1994). Motivation, self-confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 44, 417-448.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Inc.

Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666-679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.666

Dinger, F., Dickhäuser, O., Spinath, B., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of students’ achievement goals: A mediation analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 90-101.https://10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.005

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689-719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.https://10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1

Dweck, C. S., & Leggert, E. L. (2000). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. InE. Tory-Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Motivationalscience: Social and personality perspectives(pp.394-416). Psychology Press.

Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218

Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, 12(3), 331-349

Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588

Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational &PsychologicalMeasurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Lou, M. T. (2014). Changing language learning mindsets: The role of implicit theories of L2 intelligence for goal orientations and responses to failure.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Hentet fra.

MacIntyre, P., Noels, K., & Clément, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: Therole of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47(2), 265-287.

 Mercer, S., & Ryan, S. (2010). A mindset for EFL: learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal, 64(4), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp083

Molden, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in Psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192

Morgan, D. (2006). Connected contributions as a motivation combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In L. Curry, R. Shield, & T. Wetle (Eds.), Applying qualitative and mixed methods in aging and public health research:53-63. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association

Robins, R., & Pals, J. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313-336. Doi:10.1080/15298860290106805

Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2012). Implicit theories: language learning mindsets. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for Language Learning: Insights from Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 74-89). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sadeghi, F., Sadighi, F., Bagheri, M. S. (2020). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ language mindset with goal orientation and responses to failure. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-21.DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1833814

Stipek, D., & Gralinsky, J. H. (1996). Children's beliefs about intelligence and school performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.88.3.397