• Home
  • Mrs zeinab noorikia Mrs zeinab noorikia
  • OpenAccess
    • List of Articles Mrs zeinab noorikia Mrs zeinab noorikia

      • Open Access Article

        1 - Impact of Tamarix aphylla and Atriplex canescens plantations on some Physico-chemical properties of the soil in Zahak region, Sistan
        Einollah Rouhi Moghaddam Ali Heidari Sadegh Akbar Fakhireh Zeinab Noori Kia Soheila Noori
        The purpose of the research is to compare the effect of Tamarix aphylla (L.) and Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. cultivation on the soil's properties. The species were cultivated in a land with the area 42 ha and with the spacing 5m*5m in 1993 in Zahak, northern Sistan More
        The purpose of the research is to compare the effect of Tamarix aphylla (L.) and Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. cultivation on the soil's properties. The species were cultivated in a land with the area 42 ha and with the spacing 5m*5m in 1993 in Zahak, northern Sistan and Balochistan pro. Soil samples were taken at the depth of 0-30 cm and 31-60 cm with 8 replicates from any habitat and the control area using auger based on random-systematic method. physicochemical properties were measured, including soil texture, phosphorous, potassium, nitrogen, organic matter, T.N.V, EC and pH. Data analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan's test. The results showed that there were differences between the properties of the region's soil. In other words, the soil EC of A. canescens (47.98 mmhos/cm) was more than that of T. aphylla (15.70 mmhos/cm) and the control area (15.80 mmhos/cm) at the depth of 0-30 cm. The soil pH of A. canescens (8.92) was also more than that of T. aphylla (8.62) and the control area (8.70). The available potassium in T. aphylla habitat (460 ppm) was also more than that in A. canescens habitat (325 ppm) and the control area (180 ppm). At the depth of 31-60 cm, the soil pH of A. canescens (9.02) was more than that of the control area (8.65). Therefore, it is more suitable to cultivate T. aphylla as a native species than A. canescens for biological restoration of the region. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Comparison of Distance Methods for Plants Density Estimation in Hamoon Lake Rangelands in Zabol
        Vahid Rakhshanizade mohamadreza saeid afkhamoshoara Zeinab Noori Kia mohamad taheri
        Density is one of the most important quantitative indicators in the study of rangelands and therefore it is necessary to choose the most appropriate method for measuring density in each area. Estimating the density of green seedlings in biological projects is also one o More
        Density is one of the most important quantitative indicators in the study of rangelands and therefore it is necessary to choose the most appropriate method for measuring density in each area. Estimating the density of green seedlings in biological projects is also one of the concerns of supervising experts in these projects. Due to the fact that the study area is located in a desert environment have caused the vegetation to be resistant against drought and salinity and their vegetative form is often shrubs. Therefore, this research was done on fast-growing, evergreen, drought and salinity resistant species of Tamarix in three areas of annual planting. All the bases of Tamarix sp were counted in these three areas and in each area, 5 transects of 200 meters were placed parallel to each other and at a distance of 20 meters from each other and 10 points on each were identified as sampling points. This method was considered as a control. With the aim of comparing five distance methods including Closest Individual, Nearest Neighbor, Point-Centered Quarter, Quartered Neighbor and Angle Order in terms of accuracy in estimating the density of green seedlings of Tamarix species to introduce the method that provides the best accuracy in estimating the density of this species. The results show that in the area number one and three the Nearest Neighbor method and in area number two Quartered Neighbor method has the highest accuracy compared to the control. Manuscript profile