The Effect of Story Mapping on Writing Performance of Iranian EFL Learners

Subject Areas :

Omid  Tabatabaei ¹ (Assistant Prof., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch, Iran)
Nafise  Radi ² (M. A. Graduated, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch, Iran)

Received: 2011-11-12 Accepted : 2012-01-12 Published : 2013-03-01

Keywords: Story mapping, L2 writing, personal narratives, writing components, Metacognitive strategies,

Abstract :

Although story mapping strategy has been shown to be beneficial in many reading comprehension classes, the benefits of this technique have not been thoroughly investigated in L2 writing research. The small number of previous studies (e.g., Li, 2007; Brunner, 2010) have found the potential benefits of using story mapping strategy on students’ writing performance, but they did not focus on different aspects of students’ writing. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the effect of story mapping strategy on writing performance of EFL learners in terms of writing components (i.e., organization, content, grammar, mechanics, and style). After administering a standard proficiency test (OPT), 30 out of a pile of 82 Iranian EFL learners all majoring English teaching were selected and assigned to two groups: one experimental group and one control group. Both experimental and control groups completed two thirty-minute composition writing tests, one as a pre-test and the other one as a post-test. The experimental group received four sessions of instruction on how to use story mapping strategy in writing personal narratives. The results of One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Scheffé test indicated that the experimental group, which used story mapping strategy, made more progress in their personal narrative writings. Also, the results revealed that L2 learners made more progress in all writing aspects. The study contributes to teaching pedagogy by encouraging teachers to use story mapping strategy in L2 writing classes

References:

Anderson, N. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing.Modern Language Journal, 75, 460-472.

Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. In Novak, J.D., &Cañas, A.J. (2006). The Theory Undelying Concept Maps and How to Construct them. Retrieved January,25,  2011, from www.stanford.edu/concept_maps.

Baird, J. R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful inquiry and conceptual change.In Çubukçu, F. (2008).How to Enhance Reading Comprehension through Metacognitive Strategies.The Journal of International Social Research, 1/2, 84-91.

Belcher, D. (2006). English for Specific Purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 133-156.

Belcher, D. (Ed.).(2010). English for Specific Purposes in theory and practice.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 

Bhatia, R. (1991). A genre-based approach to ESP development.World Englishes, 10, 1-14.

Brunner, M. (2010).The Effect of Story Mapping and Incentives on Multiple Measures of Writing Proficiency.MA thesis, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.

Brown, J.D., & Bailey, K.M. (1984).A categorical instrument for scoring second language writing skills.In Brown, H.D. (2004).Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. USA: Longman.

Canfield, J., Hansen, M.V., Carter, C.C., Palomares, S., Williams, L.K., & Winch, B.L. (2004).Chicken Soup for the Soul.Stories for a Better World.USA: Health Communications, Inc.

Carroll, D.W. (2008). Psychology of Language.(5^thed.). US: Thomson Wadsworth.

Foley, M. (2000). The (un)making of a reader. Language Arts, 77 (6),506-511.

Hamzah, M.G., & Abdullah, S.K. (2009). Analysis on Metacognitive Strategies in Reading and Writing Among Malaysian ESL Learners in Four Education Institutions. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(9),676-683.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148-164.

Johns, A. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purpose.Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 181-190.

Jupp, T.C., & Milne, J. (1971).Guided Course in English Composition.London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Kang, J.Y. (2005). Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners.Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 259-279.

Lee, L., & Gunderson, E. (2001).Select Readings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Li, D. (2007). Story Mapping and Its Effects on Writing Fluency and Word Diversity of Students with Learning Disabilities.Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1),77-93.

Mandler, J.M. & Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.

McCabe, A., & Bliss, L.S. (2003).Patterns of narrative discourse: A multicultural, life span approach. Boston: Allyn& Bacon.

McClure, E., Mir, M., &Cadierno, T. (1993). What do we include in a narrative? A comparison of Mexican and American fourth and ninth graders.Pragmatics and Language Learning, 1, 209-224.

Negretti, R., &Kuteeva, M. (2011). Fostering metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic reading and writing: A case study of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing,20(2), 95-110.

Novak, J.D. &Cañas, A.J. (2006).The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them. Retrieved January,25,  2011, from www.stanford.edu/concept_maps.

Rahimpour, M., &Nariman-Jahan, R. (2011).The Effects of Planning on Writing Narrative Task Performance with Low and High EFL Proficiency.English Language Teaching, 4(1),120-127.

Rumelhurt, D.E. (1980). Schema: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, R.J., Bmce, B.C., &Brewer, W.F. (Eds.).Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: LawranceEribaum.

Schleppegrell, M. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Language and Education, 12, 431-459.

Schleppegrell, M. (2004).The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mahval, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Swanson, P.N. & De La Paz, S.(1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities.In Taylor, L.K., Alber, S.R., & Walker, D.W. (2002).The Comparative Effects of a Modified Self-Questionning Strategy and Story Mapping on the Reading Comprehension of Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities.Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(2),69-87.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.In Novak, J.D., &Cañas, A.J. (2006).The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them.Retrieved January 25, 2011, from www.stanford.edu/concept_maps.

Zipprich, M.A. (1995). Teaching Web Making as a Guided Planning Tool to Improve Student Narrative Writing.Remedial and Special Education, 16(1),3-15.