An Analytical Evaluation of Iranian High School ELT Textbooks from 1970 to 2010
الموضوعات :
اکبر عزیزی فر
1
(
Islamic Azad University, Ilam Branch
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: English language teaching, Textbook Design, Textbook evaluation, Communicative Achievement,
ملخص المقالة :
Textbooks play a very crucial role in the process of language teaching and learning. The present study carries out an evaluation of two series of ELT textbooks used for teaching English language in Iranian high schools since 1970 to 2010. For this purpose, Tucker’s (1975) textbook evaluation model (see Appendix) has been employed. The results suggest that one of the main factors for the students’ achievement in English language is the ELT textbooks. The researcher suggests that in the textbooks, there should be enough opportunity for the learners to communicatively practice the language they are learning.
Amalsaleh, E. (2004). The representation of social actors in the EFL textbooks in Iran. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Shiraz University, Shiraz.
Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbook: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 2, 1-8.
Birjandi, P., Nowrozi, M., & Mahmodi, G.H. (2002). Right path to English book 2. Tehran: Textbook Publishing Company of Iran.
Birjandi, P. & Soheili, A. (1985). Changing language teaching books. Roshd, Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 1, 26-27.
Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heinemann.
Darali, G. (2007). Pragmatics dimension in Spectrum textbooks. Unpublished master’s thesis, Shiraz University, Iran.
Genesee, F. (2001). Evaluation. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press,144-150.
Harmer, J. (1996). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Haycroft, J. (1998). An introduction to English language teaching. Longman.
Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.
Jahangard, A. (2007). The evaluation of the EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools. Karen’s Linguistics Issues. Retrieved August 12, 2009 from: http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/bymonth.html.
Kartner, P. (2003). Humanizing your coursebook. ELT Journal, 57(4), 405-407.
Kheibari, S. (1999). Text analysis and evaluation of TEPSOL coursebooks. Unpublished master's thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: EdinburghUniversity Press.
Morgan, T. (2003). IELTS preparation materials. ELT Journal, 57(1), 66-76.
Paulston, C. B., & M. N. Bruder. (1976). Teaching English as a second language: Techniques and procedures. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Riazi, A.M., & Aryashokouh, A. (2007). Lexis in English textbooks in Iran: Analysis of exercises and proposals for consciousness-raising activities. Pacific Association of Applied Linguists, 11, 17-34.
Shahedi, S. (2001). Constructing an analytical framework for the analysis of Persian language texts for foreign learners. Unpublished master's thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz. Iran.
Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42, 237-246.
Tomlinson, B . (2001). Materials development. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (Ed.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 66-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tucker, C.A. (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. English Teaching Forum, 13, 335-61.
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL and EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ, 8(2). Retrieved September 15, 2007 from: http://www.teslej. org/wordpress/past-issues/volume8/ej30/ej30a3/
Weiten, W., Deguara, D., Rehmke, E., & Sewell, L. (1999). University, community college, and high school students’ evaluations of textbook pedagogical aids. Teaching of psychology, 26(1), 19-21.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). The evaluation of pre-university textbooks. The Newsletter of the Iranian Academy of Science, 18, 70-87.
