اثر نیتروژن و بور بر عملکرد و عیارقند دو رقم چغندرقند

محورهای موضوعی : توليد محصولات زراعي

خليل خليلو ¹ (دانش آموخته گروه كشاورزي – زراعت ، واحد خوي، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي ، خوي – ايران)
فرزاد جلیلی ² (گروه کشاورزی-دانشکده کشاورزی- دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی خوی-ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1395/12/08 تاریخ پذیرش : 1396/05/19 تاریخ انتشار : 1394/07/15

کلید واژه: نیتروژن, بور, عملکرد, چغندرقند,

چکیده مقاله :

به منظور بررسی تأثیر نیتروژن و بور بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی دو رقم تجاری چغندرقند، آزمایشی در حومه شهرستان خوی با عرض جغرافیایی 38 درجه 33 دقیقه شمالی و طول جغرافیایی 45 درجه و 55 دقیقه شرقی به صورت اسپلیت اسپلیت پلات با سه عامل در قالب طرح بلوک¬های کامل تصادفی با سه فاکتور در سه تکرار اجرا شد. فاکتور اول: رقم در دو سطح شامل رقم خارجی فلورس (a2)و رقم ایرانی۰۰۴(a1) در کرت¬های اصلی، فاکتور دوم: نیتروژن در دو سطح شامل آزمون خاک(b1) و 5/1 برابر آزمون خاک(b2) در کرت¬های فرعی و فاکتور سوم: مصرف بور درسه سطح شامل عدم مصرف(c1)، محلول¬پاشی (c2) و مصرف خاکی(c3) در کرت¬های فرعی- فرعی در نظر گرفته شدند. نتایج نشان دادند که اثر رقم فقط بر طول ریشه معنی¬دار بود. به طوری¬که بیش‌ترین طول ريشه با 50/32 سانتي‌متر به رقم ایرانی (a1) تعلق داشت. اثر نیتروژن بر قطر ریشه، طول ریشه، وزن خشک ریشه و عملکرد ریشه معنی¬دار بود. بیشترین مقدار هر کدام از آنها به سطح 5/1 برابر آزمون خاک تعلق داشت. اثر بور نیز روی وزن خشک ریشه، عملکرد ریشه، عیار قند و میزان ملاس معنی¬دار بود. روش¬های مختلف مصرف بور نشان داد که حداکثر عملکرد در همه¬ی صفات با مصرف خاکی این عنصر حاصل شد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

To study the effect of nitrogen and boron on yield and sugar content of two varieties of sugar beet, an experiment was carried out in split-split plots at RCBD in three replications with three factors in the personal field of Khoy area. 1st factor with two levels of variety, Flores ( a1 ) and Iranian variety of 004 ( a2 ), 2nd factor with two levels of nitrogen which consisted of soil testing ( b1 ) and 1.5-time soil testing ( b2 ) and 3rd factor with three levels of boron which consisted of no-use ( b1 ), foliar ( b2 ) and soil ( b3 ) application. The result showed that variety had meaningful effect on root length; the highest root length was 32.25 cm in 004 ( a2 ) variety. The effect of nitrogen was meaningful in diameter, length and dry weight of root. The highest content of this factor was in 1.5 time of soil testing of nitrogen usage. The effect of boron on root dry weight, root yield, sugar and molasses content were meaningful. The different methods of boron application showed that maximum rate in all traits was attained with the soil usage of this element.

منابع و مأخذ:

 Abdollahian Noghabi, M.R., Sheykholeslami and B. Babaei. 2005. Terms and meanings of technological quantity and quality of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar beet, 21: 101-104. (In Farsi).
 Amjadi, P. 2003. Effects of harvest time ant variety on qualitative and quantitative characters of root sugar accumulation in sugar beet. Ms Theses. Karaj. University of Tehran.
 Baker, A.V. and Pilbeam, D.J. 2007. Hand book of plant nutrition. Boron by Umesh C. Gupta., pp.241-278.
 Baradaran Firoozabadi, M. 2002. The effect of morphological and physiological traits of sugerbeet varieties in drought stress. (in farsi).
 Bilbao, M., Martinez, J.J and Delgado, A. 2004. Evaluation of soil nitrate as a predictor of nitrogen requirement for sugar beet grown in a Mediterranean climate. Agron. J. 96:18-25.
 Butrus, L.E and Nimal, M.N. 1981. Potato and sugar beet yield and water use efficiency under different irrigation systems and water stress. Agronomy Abstracts.73rd annual meeting American Society of Agronomy.P:209.
 Camberato, J.J. 2004. Foliar application on sugar beet. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Res. 12: 120-126.
 Dolan, L. and J. Davies. 2004. Cell expansion in roots Current opinion in Plant Biology. 7: 33 – 39.
 Draycott, A.P and Christenson, D.R. 2003. Nutrients for sugar beet production, soil plant relationship, CABI Publishing, pp. 1-105.
 Gangwar, M.S. and Srivastava, H.K. 1977. Effect of B application on yield and quality of suqer beet. GB Pant University of Aqriculture and Technology, India. Pantanaqar.
 Grazebisz, W., Przygocka-Cyna, K., Lukowiak, R. and Biber, H. 2010. An evaluation of macronutrient nutritional status of suger beets in critical stages of growth in response to foliar application of multi-micro nutrient fertilizers, J. Elemental, 15(3):493-507.
 Helal, F. A., Taalab, A. S. and Safaa, A. M. 2009. Influence of nitrogen and boron nutrition on nutrient balance and sugar beet yield grown in calcareous soil, Ozean J. of Applied Sciences,2(1):1-10.
 Hoseinpour, M., A.R.Paknajad, A.Naderi, R.Eslamizadeh. 2013. Effect of different rates of nitrogen on growth characteristics, quality and quantity traits of sugar beet, Journal of Sugar beet, 29(1):33-51. (in farsi).
 Hokmabadchi, A.R. 2015. Effect of seed priming on yield and suger content on sugar beet varieties, MsC thesis, faculty of agriculture, IAU Khoy branch, (in farsi).
 Jahedi, A., A.Novruzi, M.Hasani, F. Hamdi. 2012. Effect of irrigation methods and nitrogen on quality and quantity of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar beet, 28(1):43-53. (in farsi).
 Khiamim, S., D.Mazaheri, M. Banayanaval, M.Jahansooz. 2003. Investigation of physiologic and technologic characteristics of sugar beet in different rates of density and nitrogen fertilizer, Journal of research and Building, 60:21-29. (in farsi).
 Kristek, A., Biserka, A. and Kristek, S. 2006. Effect of the foliar boron fertilization on sugar beet root yield and quality, Agriculture-Scientific and professional Review,12(1):22-26.
 Lee, C.Y. 1997. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the total amino acid content of table beet roots. J. Sci. Food Agric. 24, 843-845.
 Malakuti,M.J., A.Riazi. 2007. Soil fertility of dry region, press of Tabiat Modaress University. (in farsi).
 Noshad, H., R. Mohamadian, F. Hamdi. 2014. Effect of organic fertilizer content of amino acids on nitrogen efficiency and quality and quantity traits of sugar beet, Journal of sugar beet, 30(2):167-181. (in farsi).
 Nitchelm, J. J. and Regitnig, P. J. 2006. Effect of composted cattle manures on sugar beet production, Rograss Sugar Ltd, 5405-64 the street, Taber, AB, Canada, T1G2C4.
 Przemysław, B., Grzebisz, W., Fec M., Lukowiak, R. and Szczepaniak, W. 2010. Row method sugar beet fertilization with multicomponent fertilizer based on urea-ammonium nitrate solution as a way to increase nitrogen efficiency, Journal of Central European Agriculture, 11(2): 225-234.
 Ramazan, C.O. Errol. 2002. Root yield and quality of sugar beet in relation to sowing date, plant population and harvesting date interaction, Turk J. Agric., 18: 133-139.
 Roberts, T.L. 2008. Improving nutrient use efficiency. Turk. J. Agric. 32:177-182.
 Sadowski, A. And E. Jadczuk. 1997. Effects of nitrogen fertilization in sour cherry orchard, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Mineral Nutrition of Deciduous Fruit Trees, 448: 475-480.
 Seyedesmailzadeh, S.N. 2011. Effect of macro and microelements on quality and quantity yield of sugerbeet, MsC. thesis faculty of agriculture, IAU Mahabad branch, (in farsi).
 Yarnia,M., A.Farajzadeh, F.Razavi, N.Nobari. 2009. Effect of micronutrients on sugar beet var. Rasoul, Journal of Iranian Agronomy Science, 13(3):521-532. (in farsi).