تبیین متغیرهای زیست محیطی- کالبدی زیست پذیری با رویکرد آینده پژوهی (محدوده مورد مطالعه: بافت فرسوده منطقه 1 شهر ساری)
محورهای موضوعی : برنامه ریزی شهری
مصطفی احمدی فولادی
1
,
صدرالدین متولی
2
,
غلامرضا جانباز قبادی
3
,
سارا غلامی
4
1 - گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نور، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی وحد نور
3 - گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نور، ایران
4 - گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نور، ایران
کلید واژه: زیست پذیری شهری, بافت فرسوده شهری, متغیرهای زیست محیطی- کالبدی, آینده پژوهی, منطقه 1شهر ساری,
چکیده مقاله :
عناصر زیست محیطی- کالبدی شهری هسته ی زیست پذیری را تشکیل می دهند که در صورت عدم مطلوبیت، آینده زیستی نسل های بعدی و کیفیت زندگی شهروندان را در وضعیت بحرانی قرار خواهند داد. از آنجایی که زیست پذیری شهری به معنای واقعی به مکان، زمان و به سیستم ارزیابی کننده بستگی دارد و کیفیت زیستی بافت فرسوده‌ی منطقه یک شهر ساری که قسمت اعظمی از هسته‌ی مرکزی شهر را تشکیل میدهد، رو به اضمحلال است؛ پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین متغیرهای زیست محیطی- کالبدی زیست پذیری در بافت های فرسوده با رویکرد آینده پژوهی انجام شده است، تا تحلیل روابط متغیرهای زیست پذیری در سیستم شهری از چشم انداز آینده نگرانه برخوردار گردد. در همین راستا روش‌شناسی پژوهش به صورت توصیفی- تحلیلی و از لحاظ هدف گذاری کاربردی می باشد. جمع آوری داده ها و اطلاعات هم به صورت اسنادی و میدانی بوده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 50 نفر از خبرگان و متخصصان حوزه برنامه ریزی شهری بوده اند که به صورت نمونه گیری هدفمند انتخاب گردیدند. همچنین برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از نرم افزارهای SPSS ( برای تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی) و MICMAC (برای محاسبات اثرات متقاطع) بهره گرفته شد. یافته‌ها بیان‌گر آن است که؛ درجه پر شدگی برابر با (88/60) است که نشان از تأثیر نسبتأ زیاد عوامل بر هم بود. همچنین اثر گذارترین متغیرها از دیدگاه خبرگان به ترتیب؛ وجود فضای سبز و استقرار پارک‌ها هر کدام با 1385 امتیاز و درجه دمای مناسب با 1235 امتیاز بوده اند. متغیر عدم وزش باد شدید با 936 امتیاز، پراکنش درختچه ها و بوته ها با 898 امتیاز، جمع آوری منظم پسماند با 861 امتیاز، سیستم مناسب دفع فاضلاب با 823 امتیاز، و دفع آب‌های سطحی با 711 امتیاز به ترتیب رتبه های 4 تا 8 را به لحاظ اثرگذاری از دیدگاه خبرگان کسب کرده‌اند. با تحلیل ارتباط پراکنش معیارها ناپایداری سیستم نیز قابل تشخیص شد؛ که برای دستیابی به پایداری و سطح مطلوب فضای بافت فرسوده، تعاملات خاص بین زیر سیستم های شهری در عناصر زیست محیطی- کالبدی ضروری است.
Environmental and physical elements of the city form its livability, which, if not be desirable, will put the biological future of the next generations and the quality of life of citizens in a critical situation. Since urban livability depends on place, time and evaluation system and the biological quality of the worn-out texture of this area of Sari, which forms a large part of the central core of the city, is deteriorating, this research seeks to explain the physical-environmental variables of livability in worn-out textures with future research approach, so that the analysis of the relationships between livability variables in the urban system will have a futuristic perspective. The research methodology is descriptive-analytical and practical in terms of its goals. Data collection has been done in the form of documents and survey. The statistical population of the research included 50 experts and specialists in the field of urban planning, who were selected by purposive sampling technique. SPSS software (for exploratory factor analysis) and MICMAC software (for cross effects calculations) were used for data analysis. The findings indicate that: The degree of filling is equal to (60.88), which indicates the relatively high influence of the factors on each other. Also, from the experts" point of view, influencing variables have been identified respectively; the existence of green spaces with 1385 points, the establishment of parks with 1385 points and appropriate temperature with 1235 points. The variable of the absence of strong wind with 936 points, the distribution of shrubs and bushes with 898 points, the regular collection of waste with 861 points, the appropriate sewage disposal system with 823 points, and the disposal of surface water with 711 points ranked 4 to 8, respectively. By analyzing the correlation of the distribution of criteria, the instability of the system has been detected; and in order to achieve the stability and desired level of worn-out texture, specific interactions between urban sub-systems in environmental-physical elements are necessary. Extended Abstract Introduction With increasing population and rapid urbanization, livability has become a significant topic in urban planning. Livability refers to creating suitable living conditions in social, economic, and environmental dimensions and providing equal opportunities for all city residents. In deteriorated urban areas, this concept involves improving the current state of these regions and enhancing the quality of urban spaces. Sari, as an example of a city with historical and deteriorated areas, faces challenges such as air and noise pollution, waste accumulation, lack of proper infrastructure, and unbalanced development. These challenges, with time and population growth, could severely impact the livability of its residents. To address these issues, it is essential to use a foresight approach and precise planning. This study aims to identify the environmental and physical variables of livability with a focus on foresight and seeks to determine the key factors influencing the future livability of deteriorated areas. Methodology The present research is applied in terms of its objective and descriptive-analytical in nature, utilizing documentary-survey methods. A documentary and library study method was employed to gather existing viewpoints, theories, and experiences. Data collection tools included observation, questionnaires, and note-taking. The field method involved a Delphi survey of experts, with 50 experts selected through purposive sampling. For data analysis, SPSS software was used for exploratory factor analysis and MICMAC software for cross-impact analysis. This research was conducted in three main stages. First, livability variables (indicators) were extracted through a review of related sources. Then, exploratory factor analysis was used to cluster variables across different dimensions. In the final stage, key variables impacting the livability of the deteriorated area under study were identified using cross-impact calculations and matrix analysis. To ensure face validity and accurately measure the concepts and indicators of the questionnaire, content and face validity were employed. Thus, the questionnaire was considered valid. Cronbach's alpha was used for initial reliability estimation, yielding a value of 0.731 for all questions, indicating the high reliability of the questionnaire. Results and discussion This research utilized a Delphi method survey involving 50 experts (26 men, 24 women) with an average age of 37. The experts specialized in housing planning, urban regeneration, and foresight and were selected based on their knowledge, experience, and familiarity with the study area. The research aimed to explore livability factors in the deteriorated areas of Sari’s first district. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted in four main stages, assessing sample adequacy, forming a correlation matrix, explaining variance, and rotating factor loadings. The KMO index was 0.729, indicating sufficient variables for factor extraction. The study identified key variables such as green spaces, parks, suitable temperature, and waste management as crucial for maintaining system stability. Additionally, the analysis highlighted the strong dependency of natural landscapes and architecture on these factors. The matrix analysis confirmed the high reliability of the questionnaire, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.731, and showed that eight variables, including green spaces and waste management, were most influential. The study emphasized the importance of green spaces in mitigating air pollution and enhancing livability, especially in deteriorated urban areas. Conclusion The results of livability experiences indicate that livability is a temporal and spatial phenomenon dependent on contextual and local conditions. Therefore, livability criteria are not interchangeable and must be understood and assessed within different temporal and spatial contexts. Effective planning for livability in deteriorated urban areas and understanding future conditions require suitable planning mechanisms based on innovative approaches. This study explores livability elements within a future research framework to provide a forward-looking perspective on the relationships between livability variables in urban systems. In the deteriorated area of District 1 in Sari, after identifying variables using exploratory factor analysis, the study focused on identifying key drivers and impacts of livability variables. The results highlight that green spaces, park establishment, appropriate temperature, absence of strong winds, distribution of shrubs and plants, regular waste collection, proper sewage systems, and surface water drainage are critical variables for livability in the studied area. Among these eight variables, green spaces and park establishment, each with a score of 1385, and appropriate temperature with a score of 1235, have a significant impact on other variables. The Sari Housing and Urban Development Organization has transferred 425.6 hectares of land in Sari for residential and non-residential development between 1980 and 2008, leading to considerable loss of green spaces due to land use changes. Studies by Abdi et al. (2021) revealed that District 1 has poor green space coverage and that reduced green space in Sari affects temperature increases. This issue, emphasized by experts, indicates that appropriate temperature directly impacts air quality. Additionally, the study finds that variables related to waste management, surface water drainage, and sewage systems are also crucial for improving livability. Findings from Zirovani et al. (2022) support the importance of these indicators in livability, indicating that poor infrastructure exacerbates livability issues. The study further reveals the critical nature of dual-function indicators, such as temperature, green spaces, and plant distribution, which contribute to the instability of the livability system. To enhance livability, especially in deteriorated urban areas, it is essential to address these strategic indicators and ensure effective interactions among urban subsystems. Without maintaining environmental quality, cities risk becoming hostile environments and missing opportunities for optimizing spaces with improved environmental performance.
1. Abdi, K., kamyabi, S. and zandmoghadam, M. (2021): An Investigation into the Role of Urban Green Space Vegetation on the Temperature Changes Trend of the Urban Environments Area (Case Study: Sari City). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 23(2), 135-146. doi: 10.30495/jest.2021.38883.4423
2. Ahmed, N. O., El-Halafawy, A. M., and Amin, A. M. (2019): A critical review of urban livability. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), pp: 155-165. DOI:https:doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p165
3. Alderton, A., Higgs, C., Davern, M., Butterworth, I., CorreiaJ., Nitvimol, K. and Badland, H. (2020): Measuring and monitoring liveability in a lowto- middle income country: a proof-of-concept for Bangkok, Thailand and lessons from an international partnership. The journal of Cities & Health, 5, pp: 320- 328. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1813537
4. Aliakbari, E. and Akbari, M. (2017): Structural-interpretive modeling of factors affecting the livability of Tehran metropolis., Space planning and logistics, 21(1), 1-31
5. Alijani, S., Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K. and Sodoudi, S. (2020): A new approach of urban livability in Tehran: Thermal comfort as a primitive indicator. Case study, district 22. The journal of Urban Climate. 33, pp: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100656
6. Almashhour, R., and Samara, F. (2022). Evaluating Livability Perceptions: Indicators to Evaluate Livability of a University Campus. The journal of Sustainability, 14(19), https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911872.
7. Al-Thani, S., Muammer Koç, A. and Al-Ghamdi, S. (2019): Urban Sustainability and Livability: An Analysis of Doha’s Urban-form and Possible Mitigation Strategies. The journal of Sustainability. 11, pp: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030786
8. Altrock, Uwe, (2022): Urban livability in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods: The experience of the German program “socially integrative city”, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(5), PP: 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.006
9. Ambrose, G., Das, K., Fan, Y. and Ramaswami, A. (2020): Is gardening associated with greater happiness of urban residents? A multi-activity, dynamic assessment in the Twin-Cities region, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103776
10. Arefi, M. and Nasser, N. (2021): Urban design, safety, livability, & accessibility. Urban Design International, 26(1), PP: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-021-00155-9
11. Badland, H., Whitzman, C., Lowe, M., Davern, M., Aye, L., Butterworth, I., Hes, D. and Giles-Corti, B., (2014): Urban liveability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health, Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, 111(C), PP: 64-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003
12. Cao, Y., Li, F., Xi, X., Van Bilsen, D., Xu, X. (2021): Urban livability: Agent-based simulation, assessment, and interpretation for the case of Futian District, Shenzhen. The Journal of Cleaner Production. 320, pp: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128662
13. Chen, Chong-Wen,(2023): Can smart cities bring happiness to promote sustainable development? Contexts and clues of subjective well-being and urban livability, Developments in the Built Environment, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100108
14. Cinderby, S., Archer, D., Mehta, V. K., Neale, C., Opiyo, R., Pateman, R. M., ... and Tuhkanen, H. (2021): Assessing inequalities in wellbeing at a neighbourhood scale in low-middle-income-country secondary cities and their implications for long-term livability. Frontiers in sociology, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.729453
15. Costamagna, F., Lind, R. and Stjernström, O. (2019): Livability of urban public spaces in northern Swedish cities: The case of Umeå. Planning Practice & Research, 34(2), PP: 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2018.1548215
16. Fani, Z., Sahraeian, S. and Saeedi, S. (2023): Evaluation effective social Indicators on urban environment for the residents of Bandar Lange city. Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 3(9), 21-36. doi: 10.30495/juepd.2023.1980894.1153
17. Fu, Y., Shi, X., He, J., Yuan, Y., and Qu, L. (2020): Identification and optimization strategy of county ecological security pattern: A case study in the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106030
18. Hedayat, S. M., hadyani, Z., Hajinezhad, A. and Asgari, A. (2019): Interdisciplinary Conceptual Urban Vitality (Examining Principles, Dimensions and Indicators). Urban Structure and Function Studies, 6(20), PP: 75-103. https://doi.org/10.22080/shahr.2019.15754.1723
19. Heydary, M. T., anbarloo, A., rahmani, M. and Tahmasebi, H. (2020): Monitoring Social Living Experience in Urban Space with Future Research Approach (Case Study: Zanjan City). Geography and Planning, 24(73), PP: 121-155.doi: 10.22034/GP.2020.10782
20. Irandoost, K., Isa Lo, A., and Shah Moradi, B.(2014): Livability index in urban environments (case study: the central part of the holy city of Qom). Urban Economics and Management, 4(13), 102-120. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/240294/fa
21. Jun, S., Li, M. and Jung, J. (2022): Air Pollution (PM2. 5) Negatively Affects Urban Livability in South Korea and China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013049
22. Lowe, M., Whitzman, C., Badland, H., Davern, M., Aye, L., Hes, D., ... and Giles-Corti, B. (2015): Planning healthy, liveable and sustainable cities: how can indicators inform policy?. Urban policy and research, 33(2), PP: 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.1002606
23. Mohit, M. A. and Iyanda, S. A. (2016): Liveability and low-income housing in Nigeria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222,PP: 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.198
24. Mouratidis, K. (2018): Is compact city livable? The impact of compact versus sprawled neighbourhoods on neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban studies, 55(11), PP: 2408-2430. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26958538.
25. Mouratidis, K. (2020): Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, PP: 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.006
26. Mousavi, M., Jahangirzadeh, J., Bayramzadeh, N., Shahsavar, A. and Omidvarfar, S. (2023): An Analysis of the Livability Situation in Urban Environments (Case Study: Kouye Salar Neighborhood-Urmia). Urban Environmental Planning and Development, 3(11), 1-18. DOI: 10.30495/JUEPD.2023.1984805.1184
27. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. and Valente, R. R. (2019): Livability and subjective well-being across European cities. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 14, PP: 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9587-7
28. Paap, A. Frantzeskaki, N(2022): Greening strategies, participatory planning and liveability (Master's thesis). Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University.
29. Paul, A. and Sen, J. (2017): Identifying factors for evaluating livability potential within a metropolis: a case of Kolkata. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 11(1), PP: 50-55. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1131185
30. Paul, A. and Sen, J. (2018): Livability assessment within a metropolis based on the impact of integrated urban geographic factors (IUGFs) on clustering urban centers of Kolkata. Cities, 74, PP: 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.015
31. Perry, G., Gebresenbet, F., DaPra, M., Branco, P., Whibesilassie, W., Jelacic, M. and Eyob, A. E. (2022): Why urban ecology matters in Ethiopia. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.843698
32. Pragati, S., Shanthi Priya, R., Pradeepa, C. and Senthil, R. (2023): Simulation of the Energy Performance of a Building with Green Roofs and Green Walls in a Tropical Climate. Sustainability, 15(3), 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032006
33. Ruszczyk, H. A., Halligey, A., Rahman, M. F. and Ahmed, I. (2023): Liveability and vitality: an exploration of small cities in Bangladesh. Cities, 133, doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104150
34. saffari, F. and nazmfar, H. (2023): Measuring the livability of urban areas with an emphasis on the environmental dimension (case study of district 3 of Ardabil city). Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 8(1), 6220-6228. DOI: 10.22034/JESS.2022.367177.1897
35. Sari Municipality. (2011): Urban Renewal and Regeneration Plan for the Deteriorated Texture of Sari City, Phase Two Studies: Detailed Recognition of Zones. Haft shahre Arya Consulting Engineers.
36. Sasanpour, F., Tavalaie, S. and Jafari Asasabadi, H. (2014): Livability of cities in sustainable urban development: A case study of Tehran metropolis. Geography, 12(42), PP:129-157. DOI: 10.30495/JUPM.2021.29248.4032
37. Shabanzadeh Namini, R., Loda, M. and Meshkini, A. (2021): SWOT Analysis and Developing Strategies for the Realisation of Urban Livability in Tehran. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(1), PP: 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2020.1827412
38. Shamaei, A., Sasanpour, F., Soleimani, M., Ahadnejad, M. and Heidari, T. (2016): The Analysis of Livability in Urban Distressed Areas: old textures of Zanjan (A Case Study). Human Geography Research, 48(4), PP: 783-799. 10.22059/JHGR.2016.53481
39. Sheikh, W. T. and van Ameijde, J. (2022): Promoting livability through urban planning: A comprehensive framework based on the “theory of human needs”. Cities, 131, 103972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103972
40. Shi, C., Guo, N., Zeng, L. and Wu, F. (2022): How climate change is going to affect urban livability in China, Climate Services, 26, 100284. doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100284
41. Statistical Center of Iran. (2016): General Population and Housing Census.
42. Taghavizirvani, E., Nazmfar, H., & Mansourian, H. (2022): Evaluation and Explanation of Components Affecting Urban Viability: A Case Study on Sari City. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 9(32), 137-163. doi: 10.22080/usfs.2022.22643.2209
43. Taleshi Anbohi, M., aghaeizade, E. and Jafari Mehrabadi, M. (2020): Structural analysis of Livability of Urban Deteriorated Textures with a Futuristic Approach(Case study: Deteriorated Texture of region 1 of Qazvin City). Research and urban planning, 10(39), 117-134.
44. Taleshi Anbohi, M., Aghaeizadeh, E. and Jafari Mehrabadi, M. (2019): Assessment on Livability of Urban Deteriorated Fabrics : A Case Study of Qazvin. Sustainable city, 2(3), PP: 59-78. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2019.195007.1072
45. Wang, Y. and Miao, Z. (2022): Towards the analysis of urban livability in China: spatial–temporal changes, regional types, and influencing factors. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 60153-60172. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-20092-6
46. Xiao,Y, Li,Y ,Tang, X, Huang, H and Wang, R (2022): Assessing spatial–temporal evolution and key factors of urban livability in arid zone: The case study of the Loess Plateau, China, Ecological Indicators, 140,108995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108995
47. Yu, J., Li, X., Guan, X. and Shen, H (2022): A remote sensing assessment index for urban ecological livability and its application, Journal of Geo-spatial Information Science, 25, PP:1- 22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2022.2072775
48. Zebardast, E. (2017). Exploratory Factor Analysis in Urban and Regional Planning. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 22(2), 5-18. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2017.240054.6718010
49. Zhan, D., Kwan, M. P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., and Dang, Y. (2018): Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79,PP: 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025