سنجش محور دید گردشگر از درک کیفیت کالبد فضایی شهرها با تأکید بر خوانایی در سراهای بازار ایرانی (مورد پژوهی: سراهای بازار شهر اصفهان

محورهای موضوعی : برنامه ریزی شهری

سمیه پهلوان ¹ , حسین سلطان زاده ² , فرح حبیب ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه معماری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - استاد، گروه معماری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - استاد، گروه معماری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/05/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/09/20 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/11/01

کلید واژه: سراهای بازار تاریخی اصفهان, میدان دید گردشگر, کیفیت فضایی, آنالیز آیزوویست, آنالیز تحلیل زاویه ای,

چکیده مقاله :

بررسی فضاهای معماری گذشته و فرآیند طراحی مبتنی بر شاهد، امکان درک و کشف ویژگی های کالبدی آن را فراهم می کند. میدان دید به دلیل ایجاد ارتباط بصری به تقویت رابطه ادراکی میان انسان و کالبد در بازارهای تاریخی و عرصه ایجاد محیطی دعوت کننده و فعال را فراهم می کند. از این رو پژوهش حاضر، ورودی سراهای بازار اصفهان را با هدف بررسی میدان دید و میزان جذابیت بصری، به عنوان مکانی که در اولین نگاه گردشگر با آن مواجه می شود، مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار می دهد و به ارزیابی مولفه های کیفیت کالبدی با تاکید برخوانایی در سنجش میدان دید و عمق زاویه نگاه گردشگر می پردازد. سؤال اصلی پژوهش این است که چه رابطه ای میان محوردید گردشگر و مؤلفه های کیفیت کالبد فضایی در جهت خوانایی در ورودی سراهای بازار تاریخی اصفهان وجود دارد؟ در این پژوهش از آنالیز آیزوویست و آنالیز عمق زاویه ای برای سنجش میدان دید گردشگر درنسخه فعلی نرم افزار depthmap استفاده شده است. در جهت تهیه گزارش به صورت میدانی از 12 دانشجو معماری ناآشنا با محیط و 12 کسبه آشنا با محیط خواسته شد با حضور در فضا به تبیین مؤلفه های تأثیرگذار در جهت خوانایی و کیفیت فضایی بپردازند. در بررسی صورت گرفته از سه دسته سرا (کوچک، متوسط، بزرگ) می توان به این نتیجه رسید که طول دالان، مدل ورودی (به صورت مستقیم، شکسته یا مارپیچ)، محل قرار گیری ورودی (گوشه، میان ضلع طولی یا عرضی)، شکل حیاط( مستطیل یا مربع) و مساحت حیاط می تواند در گستره میدان دید گردشگر تأثیر گذار باشد و میدان دید گردشگر از نگاه دید آیزوویستی و تحلیل زاویه ای در تمام موارد با خوانایی به عنوان یکی از مولفه های کیفیت کالبدی فضا رابطه مستقیم ندارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

      The present study analyzes the entrance of Isfahan Bazaar saria with the aim of investigating the field of vision and the level of visual attractiveness as a place that a tourist encounters at the first glance, and evaluates the components of physical quality with an emphasis on It measures the field of view and the depth of the tourist's gaze angle. The main question of the research is what is the relationship between the tourist's point of view and the physical-spatial quality components in the direction of readability at the entrance of the historical bazaar of Isfahan? The answer to this question is proposed in the form of this hypothesis; It seems that the greater the field and the depth of the viewing angle, it has a greater effect on the legibility of the environment as one of the components of environmental quality.In the study of three categories of Saria (small, medium, large), it can be concluded that the length of the corridor, the model of the entrance (straight, broken or spiral), the location of the entrance (corner or middle of the longitudinal or transverse side), The shape of the yard (rectangular or square), the area of ​​the yard in the plan can have an effect on the field of view of the tourist. But the tourist field of view, Isovist view and angle analysis in all cases have no direct relationship with readability as one of the components of the physical quality of space.Extended AbstractIntroduction:    The present study analyzes the entrance of Isfahan Bazaar saria  with the aim of investigating the field of vision and the level of visual attractiveness as a place that a tourist encounters at the first glance, and evaluates the components of physical quality with an emphasis on It measures the field of view and the depth of the tourist's gaze angle. The main question of the research is what is the relationship between the tourist's point of view and the physical-spatial quality components in the direction of readability at the entrance of the historical bazaar of Isfahan? The answer to this question is proposed in the form of this hypothesis; It seems that the greater the field and the depth of the viewing angle, it has a greater effect on the legibility of the environment as one of the components of environmental quality Methodology.Results and discussion:      As a general result, it can be acknowledged that the observer's view from the Aizovist point of view does not have a direct relationship with readability as one of the components of the physical quality of the space. The vault of gifts is effective for attracting the unfamiliar audience (tourist) to that space, in the case that the short corridors show the current state of the palace for the audience with a passing glance and give him a general view of the palace. The longer the hallway is, the less the lines of sight are, and the attention is focused on the body of the hallway and the mind is involved in the analysis of the body and the spatial structure of the hallways, which multiply similar forms in the ceiling of the entrances leading to the mezzanine, the ceiling, and the vaults and details of the roof. Long-term Isovist view in the corridors, the direct connection between the states of the lines and the psychological states of the people, the parallel and parallel horizontal lines, even with the distance between them, with the help of the human eye, the principle of continuity, the straight and smooth line is understood and evoked. According to the prepared report and the software data about the angular analysis and the amount of rotation of the tourist in the environment, it was also proved to affect the understanding and readability. In all cases, direct paths have no direct relationship with the readability and appeal in the direction of attracting tourists. Why that the entrances that had a large rotation angle in the long corridors, the viewer is involved in the physical arrangement. The decorations protruding from the ceiling are effective in terms of depth and connection and the tourist's perspective and invite people to move in the space of the market. By being in the architectural space and seeing many layers in the horizontal and vertical view, the tourist will see different perspectives in the architectural space and will have a different understanding, this shows that the field of view alone is not enough to understand the environment.Conclusion:      In the study of three categories of houses (small, medium, large), it can be concluded that the length of the corridor, the model of the entrance (straight, broken or spiral), the location of the entrance (corner or middle of the longitudinal or transverse side), The shape of the yard (rectangular or square), the area of ​​the yard in the plan can have an effect on the field of view of the tourist. But the tourist field of view, Isovist view and angle analysis in all cases have no direct relationship with readability as one of the components of the physical quality of space.

منابع و مأخذ:

• .  Abbas Zadegan, Mostafa, Azari, Abbas. (2011). Measuring the effective criteria on the creation of pedestrian routes by using GIS spatial information system and space layout.

• Abbasov, I. B. (2019). Psychology of visual perception. Amazon Digital Services LLC.


• Academic Jihad of Fine Arts College. (2009). Iranian market, an experience in documenting Iranian markets. Tehran: Academic Jihad, Tehran branch.


• Ali al-Hasabi, Mehran. Hosseini, Seyyed Bagher; Nasabi, Fatemeh. (2011). Analyzing the visual quality of the residential space according to the ability and amount of visibility, Journal of the Architecture and Urban Planning Association of Iran. Number 3. pp. 69-83.


• Bahraini Hossein (2003). Urban design process, Tehran: Tehran University Press.

•        Baptiste Hervé, J. (2022), Automated Isovist Computation for Minecraft. Christoph Salge
  University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, UK.

• Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: isovist and isovist fields, Environment and Planning B:
  Planning and Design (6).pp. 65-47.


• Bentley, I., Alsosk, A., Murrain, P., Mc Glynn, S., and Smith, G. (1985). Responsive Environment: A Manual for Designers, London: Architectural Press.


• Carmona, Matthew, S, Tiesdell, T. Heath, and T. Oc. (2003). Public places urban space, The Dimensions of urban Design, Londan: Architecture press.


• Davis, L. S. & Benedikt, M. L. (1979) Computational models of space: isovists and isovist fields, Computer Graphics and Image Processing ,11 (3). pp 72-49 .


• Dzebic, V. (2013). Isovist analysis as a tool for capturing responses towards the Built Environment. University of Waterloo.


• Esfandiari, Akram; Leave it, Abbas. (2018). Application of isovist analysis and sight lines in measuring visual quality in residential complexes. Journal of urban studies. 9(35). pp. 19-32.


• Forsyth, A., and Crewe, K. (2009). New Visions for Suburbia: Ressessing Aesthetics and Place – making in Modernism, Imageability and New Urbanism. Journal of Urban Design.pp. 420-430.


• Franz, G., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Predicting experiential qualities of architecture by its spatial properties. Paper presented at the 18th International Association for People-Environment Studies.


• Funk, p.(2014). Urban streetscape desing. Hong kong: desing media publishing limited.


• Gehl, J. (1987). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space; Van Nostrand Reinhold.


• Greene, S. (1992).Cityshape. JAPA58(2):177-189.


• Grutter, Yorg. (2006). Aesthetics in architecture, translation: Jahanshah Pakzad. Fourth edition, Shahid Beheshti University Press, Tehran.


• Haji Ghasemi, Kambiz. (1999). Ganjnameh: Culture of Islamic Architectural Works of Iran: Volume 9. Bazaar buildings. The first part. Tehran: Organization of Cultural Heritage of the country.


• Heft, H. &Naser, J, L.(2000), Envaluating environmental scenes using dynamic versus satatic displays. Environment and behavier, 32(3), 301-322.


• Helen Brand, Robert, (2006). Islamic architecture, form, function and meaning. Translated by Bagher Ayatollah Zadeh Shirazi, second edition. Tehran: Rozeneh Publications.


• Hillier, B, & Hanson. (1984). The Social logic of space. New York: Cambridge University .in Translation of Charlotte’s Web. Studies in Literature and Language , (12),14-18. http://www.cscanada.net/index.php/sll/article/view/8117.


• Hillier, B. (2007), Space is the machine, A configurational theory of architecture Space Syntax.


• Hosseini, Arezo. (2011). Typology of Isfahan bazaar caravansarais in the Safavid period based on spatial structure. Isfahan Art University (Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning). Esfahan.


• Johanes, M., Huang, J. (2022). Deep Learning Spatial Signature Inverted GANs for isovist representation in architectural floorplan, Co-creating the Future – eCAADe 40. Pp 621-629.


• Juriah Zakaria , Norsidah Ujang, (2014). Comfort of Walking in the City Center of Kuala Lumpur. AcE-Bs2014Seoul. Asian Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, S. Korea, 25-27, " Environmental Settings in the Era of Urban Regeneration".


• Kayani, Mohammad Yusuf; Wolfram Glais. (1994). Iranian workshops. Tehran, Iran's Cultural Heritage Organization.


• Kim, Y.S., Jeong, J.Y., Kim, M.K.,. Lee, S.W., Kim, M. (2010). Personal Cognitive Characteristics in Affordanceb Perception: Case Study in a Lobby. Emotional Engineering. Springer. London.


• Kumar, R. (2009). “Walkability of Neighborhoods: A Critical Analysis of Zoning Codes. Master of Community Planning, University of Cincinnati.


• Lawson, B. (2001). The Language of Space. Great Britain: Architectural Press.


• Lennard, S.H.C., and Lennard, H.L. (1993). Urban Space Design and Social Life, In Farmer, Ben and Louw, H. Eds., Companion to Contemporary Architectural Thought, New York: Routledge Inc.


• Loaitou-Sideris, A., and Banerjee, T. (1998). Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form, University of California Press.


• Lynch, Kevin. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA. MIT press.


• Lynh, Kevin. (2007). The theory of city form. Translatedby Hossein Bahraini. Tehran: University of Tehran.


• Lynch, Kevin. (1995). Cityscape. Translation: Manouchehr Mazini. Tehran: Tehran University Press.

•        Marcus C.C., and Francis, C(1990). People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Methods of Landscape Analysis (Ed) HC Murray (London, Landscape Re search Group):pp 10-9.

• Mayor of London.(2009). Draft Revised Supplementary Planning Guidance London View Management Framework, Greater London Authority City Hall, pp.3-9.


• Mozayeni, Manouchehr. (1998). A study of the anatomy of Tehran city from the point of view of visual and aesthetics. Tehran. Tehran Study and Planning Center.


• Oldenburg, R. (1999). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and how they Get You Through the Day, Paragon House: New York.


• Ostwald, M. J., & Dawes, M. (2013). Prospect- refuge patterns in Frank Lloyd Wright’s Prairie houses: Using isovist fields to examine the evidence. The Journal of Space Syntax, 4(1), 136-159.


• Pirnia, Mohammad Karim, Karamat El..Afr. (1991). way and ligament Tehran, Iran's Cultural Heritage Organization and Armin Publications.


• Pour Jafar, Mohammad Reza. Sadeghi, Alireza. (2006). The principles governing the purposeful design of the vision axes of the city index, Hoyt Shahr magazine (3).


• Pour Jafar, Mohammad Reza; Ranjbar, Ehsan; Farahani, Maryam. (2006). Recognizing the foundations of the formation of the axis of the urban index, Abadi Quarterly, 16(53). pp. 85-80.


• Pourjafar, M.R., Sadeghi, A.R.(2007). Recognizing and Organizing Visual Corridors. The National Conference on Innovative Idea in Urban Management. Tehran: Iranian Student Book Agency, p 34-40.


• Punter, John V., and Matthew Carmona. (1997). The Design Dimension of Planning: Theory, Content, and Best Practice for Design Policies. London: Spon press.


• Qiang Sheng, Dongyang Wan and Boya Yu. (2021), Effect of Space Configurational Attributes on Social
  Interactions in Urban Parks, Sustainability, p13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147805.


• Santosa, H., Ernawati, J., & Wulandari, L. D. (2018). Visual quality evaluation of urban commercial streetscape for the development of landscape visual planning system in provincial street corridors in Malang, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.


• Siro, Maxim. (1949). Iranian caravanserais and small buildings in the middle of the road. Translated by Isa Behnam. Cairo-Tehran, National Antiquities Protection Organization of Iran.


• Soltanzadeh, Hossein. (1983). The process of city formation and the religious process in Iran. Publisher. Tehran.


• Soltanzadeh, Hossein. (2001). Bazar Irani, Tehran: Office of Cultural Research.


• Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the Walkable City, J. Urban Planing and Development.


• Spreiregen, Paul. (1989). Urban De- sign. AIA. United States.


• Steve, A. (2005). Walkability Scoping Paper. Available at http://www.levelofservice.com/walkabilityresearch.


• Taher, B., & Brown, F. (2003). The visibility graph: An approach for the analysis of traditional domestic M’zabite spaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Space Syntax Fourth InternationalSymposium, University College London, London.


• Tang, J., & Long, Y. (2019). Measuring visual quality of street space and its temporal variation: methodology and its application in the Hotong area in Beijing. Landscape and urban planning,191,103436.


• Tavasoli, Mahmoud; Bonyadi, Nasser. (2007). urban space design; Urban space and their place in the beautiful urban life. Tehran: Shahidi Center for Studies and Researches in Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran.


• Trancik, (1989). Finding Lost Spaca: Theort of Urban Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  56.Turner . (2002). Angular analysis.A method for the quantification of space. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis.


• Turner, A. (2001). “Depthmap: A Program to Perform Visibility Graph Analysis”. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, p. 9.


• Turner, P.(2005). Affordance as Contect. Interacting with computers, 17(6). 787-800.


• Vahdatpour, Sholah; Vali Big, Nima; Rahimi Aryaei, Afrooz. (2017). A comparative study of inner-city and outer-city caravanserai in the field of architecture. Hoyt Shahr Magazine (39) 13. pp. 103-116.


• Wagman, Jeffrey B.; Blau, Julia J. C. (2020). Perception as Information Detection: Reflections on Gibson’s Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Routledge. p. 85.


• Waldock, Reece, (2012). Designing for pedestrians: guidelines,Department of Transport: http:// www .transport wa.gov. au/ media Files/WALK_P_Walkability_Audit_Tool.


• Wang, J. Xu, C., Pauleit, S., Kindler, A., Banzhaf, E. (2019). Spatial patterns of urban green infrastructure for equity: a novel exploration. J. Clean. Prod. 238, 117858.


• Wiener, J. M., & Franz, G. (2004). Isovists as a means to predict spatial experience and behavior. Paper presented at the International Conference on Spatial Cognition.


• Withagen, R., J.de Poel, H., Araujo, D. & Pepping, G-J. (2012). Affordance Can Invite Behavior: Reconsidering the Relationship between Affordance and Agency. New Ideas in Psychology,(30), 250-258.

• 65  .Zekavat, Kamran. (2006). Strategic framework of visual management of the city, Abadi magazine. Number 53.


•