Mediated Learning Experience as a Multi-Dimensional Approach in ELT: A Meticulous and Elaborate Taxonomy
محورهای موضوعی : Research PaperEffat Hadidi Zavareh 1 , Abdollah Baradaran 2 , Bahram Mowlaie 3
1 - Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Foreign Languages, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Course Design, Dynamic Assessment Methodology, Learning Model, MLE Taxonomy,
چکیده مقاله :
This article tries to delineate different aspects of Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) in detail: MLE as a model of learning in psychology, MLE as a dynamic assessment methodology, and MLE as a basis for designing a course. This article tries to delineate different aspects of Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) in detail: MLE as a model of learning in psychology, MLE as a dynamic assessment methodology, and MLE as a basis for designing a course. MLE, well-known as Feuerstein's theory, is presented as a model of learning in psychology for enhancing cognitive functioning and problem-solving skills in children with cognitive challenges. Some other studies and scholars such as Poehner (2008) consider MLE as a dynamic assessment methodology because in dynamic assessment, assistance emerges from the interaction between the mediator and the learner. The other studies look at MLE as a holistic and integrative approach which is able to prepare a course. Definition of MLE principles and a meticulous and elaborate analysis of the first five MLE principles in different studies, entitled as MLE Taxonomy, are presented in a table at the end of the article.
Cioffi, G., & Carney, J. (1983). The dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 764-768.
Feuerstein, R. ; Rand, Y. ;Hoffman, M.B. . (1981). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. International Journal of Rehabiliation Research, 465-466.
Feuerstein, R. (1990). The theory of structural cognitive modifiability. In B.Presseisen, Learning and thinking styles: Classroom interaction (pp. 68-134). Washington, DC: National Educational Assossiation.
Feuerstein, R. (2000). Mediated learning experience, instrumental enrichment and the learning propensity assessment device. In Interdisciplinary counsel on development and learning disorders, ICDL clinical practice guidelines: Redefining the standards of care for infants, children, and families with special needs (pp. 557-578).
Feuerstein, R., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Hoffman, M. B., Rand, Y., Jensen, M. R., Tzuriel, D., & Hoffman, D. B. (1985). Learning to Learn: Mediated Learning Experiences and Instrumental Enrichment. Special Services in the Schools, 49-82.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. (1988). Don't accept me as I am (R.Feuerstein, Hebrew Trans. 2001). New York: Plenum.
Feuerstein, R.; Krasilovsky, D. & Rand, Y. (1978). Modifiability During Adolescence. In J. Anthony, The Child and His Family: Children and Their Parentsin a Changing World (pp. 197-217). London: Wiley.
Haywood, H., Brooks, P., & Burns, S. (1985). Stimulating cognitive development at developmental level: A tested non-remedial preschool curriculum for Preschoolers and older retarded children. Special Services in the Schools, 127-147.
Isman, E., & Tzuriel, D. (2008). The mediated learning experience (MLE) in a three generational perspective. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 545-560.
Klein, P. S. (1988). Stability and change in interaction of Israeli mothers and infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 55-70.
Klein, P. S., & Alony, S. (1993). Immediate and Sustained Effects of Maternal Mediating Behaviors on Young Children. Journal of Early Intervention , 177-193.
Klein, P. S., Raziel, P., Birsh, M., & Birenbaum, E. (1987). Cognitive performance of 3-year-olds born at very low birth weight. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Genaecology, 117-129.
Klein, P. S., Zarur, S., & Feldman , R. (2003). Mediational behaviors of preshoolers teaching their younger siblings. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 233-242.
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kozulin, A. (2002). Sociocultural theory and the mediated learning experience. School psychology international, 7-35.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of applied linguistics, 49-72.
Lebeer, J. (1995). Conductive education and the mediated learning experience theory of Feuerstein . European Journal of Special Needs Education , 124-137.
Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin , B. Gindis, & V. Ageyev, Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lidz, C. S., Bond, L., & Dissinger, L. (1991). Consistency of mother-child interaction using the mediated learning experience (MLE) scale. Special Services in the Schools, 145-165.
Paour, J. (1990). Piagetian constructivism and the concept of mediated learning experience. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 177-190.
Poehner, M. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Boston : Springer.
Schur, Y., Skuy, M. A., Fridjhon, P., & Zietsman, A. (2002). A thinking journey based on constructivism and mediated learning experience as a vehicle for teaching science to low functioning students and enhancing their cognitive skills. School psychology international, 36-67.
Seabi, J. (2012). Feuerstein's mediated learning experience as a vehicle for enhancing cognitive functioning of remedial school learners in South Africa. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 35-45.
Seabi, J., & Amod, Z. (2009). Effects of mediated intervention on cognitive functions: A pilot study with Grade 5 learners at a remedial school. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 185-198.
Seabi, J., Cockcroft, K., & Fridjohn, P. (2009). Effects of mediated learning experience, tutor Support and peer collaborative learning on academic achievement and intellectual functioning among college students. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 161-167.
Seng, T. O. (2003). Mediated learning and pedogogy: Applications of Feuerstein's theory in twenty-first century education. REACT, 53-63.
Skuy, M. (1997). Cross cultural and interdimensional implications of Feuerstein's construct of mediated learning experience. School psychology international, 119-135.
Skuy, M., Gewer, A., Osrin, Y., Khunou, D., Fridjohn, P., & Rushton, J. P. (2002). Effects of mediated learning experience on Raven's matrices scores of African and non-African university students in South Africa. Intelligence, 221-232.
Tzuriel , D. (1996). Mediated learning experience in free-play versus structured situations among preschool children of low-, medium-, and high-SES. Early Child Development and Care, 57-82.
Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Zeliger, M., Friedman, A., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Effects of the "Bright Start" program in kindergarten on teachers' use of mediation and children's cognitive modifiability. Early Child Development and Care, 1-20.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society, The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
