طراحی چارچوب ارزشیابی برنامه درسی جدید زبان انگلیسی دوره متوسطه جمهوری اسلامی ایران

محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی

عباس خضری ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری رشته مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.)
رحمت اله مرزوقی ² (استاد دانشکده علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.)
جعفر جهانی ³ (دانشیار دانشکده علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.)
سید آیت اله رزمجو ⁴ (استاد دانشکده زبان‌های خارجی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/04/06 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/04/24 تاریخ انتشار : 1398/07/01

کلید واژه: زبان انگلیسی, برنامه درسی, چارچوب ارزشیابی,

چکیده مقاله :

پژوهش حاضر به طراحی چارچوب ارزشیابی برنامه درسی جدید زبان انگلیسی دوره متوسطه جمهوری اسلامی ایران با استفاده از روش پژوهش کیفی از نوع تحلیل مضمون پرداخته است. مشارکت‌کنندگان بالقوه این پژوهش سرگروه‌های آموزشی زبان انگلیسی دوره متوسطه جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مؤلفان کتاب‌های درسی زبان انگلیسی و کارشناسان ارزشیابی برنامه درسی بودند. نمونه‌گیری به‌صورت هدفمند و با رویکرد اشباع نظری داده‌ها صورت گرفت. داده‌ها با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه‌ساخت‌یافته جمع‌آوری، سپس کدگذاری شده و مورد تحلیل مضمون قرار گرفت. با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Nvivo10 شبکه مضامین ترسیم گردید. یافته‌ها نشان داد که چارچوب ارزشیابی برنامه درسی شامل ابعاد اهمیت ارزشیابی برنامه درسی، ویژگی‌های برنامه درسی جدید زبان انگلیسی، ابعاد، ملاک‌ها و معیارهای ابعاد و مشارکت‌کنندگان در ارزشیابی برنامه درسی می‌گردد که هر کدام دارای زیر ابعادی بودند که در شبکه مضامین به‌عنوان چارچوب ارزشیابی برنامه درسی زبان انگلیسی سازمان‌دهی شدند. نتیجه‌گیری کلی اینکه یک چارچوب جامع باید شامل همه ابعاد و زیر ابعاد ذکر شده باشد. پیشنهاد می‌گردد برنامه درسی جدید زبان انگلیسی دوره متوسطه با استفاده از این چارچوب مورد ارزشیابی قرار گیرد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

This aim of this research was to develop an evaluation framework of English language curriculum in the secondary schooling of Islamic republic of Iran using themes analysis qualitative method. Potential Participants were English language educational groups' leaders, authors of English textbooks and curriculum Evaluation Experts. Sampling was done purposive with data saturation approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, open-ended questions with key informants. They changed into codes and then themes were discovered. Themes network was drawn with Nvivo 10.Findings showed that curriculum evaluation framework includes significance, characteristics, dimensions, criteria and participants which each of them had subdimentions. They were organized in themes network as curriculum evaluation framework. It is concluded that a framework of curriculum evaluation should include all of the mentioned dimensions and subdimensiones. It is suggested that New English language curriculum of secondary schooling was evaluated by using this framework.

منابع و مأخذ:

Afzaal, H., Dogar, A.H., Azeem, M., Shakoor, A. (2012). Evaluation of Curriculum Development. University of Education. College road, Township, Lahore, Pakistan.

 

Anabisarab, M.R. (2014). English language curriculum guide of high school: opportunities and challenges of development and implementation. Educational innovations journal, no. 9[In persian]

Al-Jardani, K. S. (2013). Developing a framework for English Language evaluation in Oman. University of Malaya, Faculty of Education.Kualalumpur.

Ahmadi, Gh. (2004). The process of curriculum evaluation. Tehran, Education ministry.

Aminzade, H. M. (2004).Evaluation role in amount of productivity and effectiveness of standards in education.Standard and making standardized in education scientific.. [In persian]

Amiotte, D, Montilleaux, M, Ricketts & Sierra, O. (2012). A framework for curriculum Evaluation. Graduate Studies Department.Oglalu Lakota College. Department.Oglalu Lakota College.

Bharvad, Amrut J. (2010).Curriculum Evaluation. International Research Journal.ISSN- 0975-3486 RNI: RAJBIL 2009/30097 VOL I, ISSUE 12

Binesh, M., Bakhtiari, M., Gharari,M. (2016). Aims and necessity Of curriculum evaluation.Journal of Research in Psychology and Education,Vol. 2, No 8, Pp. 201-215. [In persian]

Brewder, J., and A. Hunter. (1989). Multimethod Research: A synthesis of Styles, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Brown, J.D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum. A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston, Heinle & Heinle.

Brown, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in psychology,       3(2).pp.77-101.

Chen, Chun-fu. (2009). A Case Study in the Evaluation of English Training Courses Using a Version of the CIPP Model as an Evaluative Tool. School of Education, Durham University. United Kingdom.

Council for Cultural Co-operation. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages:  Learning, teaching, assessment. Modern Languages Division, Strasbourg. Council of Europe. Cambridge University Press.

Curriculum Council. (2012). The Curriculum Framework. Retrieved from

     http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet/years_K10/Curriculum_Framework.

Department of Education & Early Development. (2012). Curriculum Frameworks Project. November 2012.

 http://www.eed.state.ak.us/tls/frameworks/content.htm.

Department of Education- California. (2012). Curriculum Frameworks & Instructional Materials.

 http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/. November 2012.

Department of Education- Pennsylvania. (2012). Curriculum Frameworks.

     http://www.pdesas.org/module/sas/curriculumframework.

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials' ELT Journal51 (1). Oxford University   Press.

Fathivajarghah, K. (2008). Curriculum development principles. Iran, Tehran, Iranzamin publication co.. [In persian]

Ghasempoor, A., Nasr, A. (2012).Moral approach and Curriculum development. Research in educational problems, 19^th year, new period,no. 13.. [In persian]

Heidari, F.,Ahmadi, Gholam Ali. (2014). Recognition of problems of curricula evaluation process and representing Solutions for deleting them. Research in curriculum development Journal, 10^th year, 2^nd period, no. 9 (serial no. 63).. [In persian]

Heidari, Sh. (2010). Sanandaj primary school teachers' attitudes about descriptive evaluation, M.A thesis, Kurdistan University.. [In persian]

Islami, J., Khademi, M., Mohammadi, H., Goodarzi, M.A. (2015). Developing evaluation framework of clinical Physiopathology, Shiraz University, Educational sciences department.. [In persian]

Jolly, D. & Bolitho, R. (1998). A framework for materials writing.Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University     Press.

Kalantari, R., Gholami,J. (2013). Recognition and prioritizing factors relating to English language curriculum Linguistics researches in English language journal, 4th period, no.1. [In persian]

Kelly, A.V. (1999). The curriculum: theory and practice (4th Ed.). London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

Kiyani, G. R., Mirhosseini, A. & Navidinia, H. (2011). Foreign Language Education Policies in Iran: Pivotal       Macro Considerations. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 53(222). [In persian]

Lawrence, W.P.W. (2011). Textbook Evaluation: A Framework for evaluating the fitness of the Hong Kong New Secondary School Curriculum.

Lynch, B.K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mackay, R. (1994). Undertaking ESUEFL programme review for accountability and improvement. English Language Teaching Journal, 48 (2): 142-9.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching.Edinburgh. Edinburgh University    Press.

Maleki, H. (2004).Curriculum development,Mashhad,Payam andishe.. [In persian]

Maleki, H. (2013).Introductions to Curriculum development.Tehran,S.A.M.T.. [In persian]

Maleki, H. (2010).principals of Curriculum development. Tehran,S.A.M.T. [In persian]

Masuhara, H. (1998). Chapter 10. What do teachers really want from cousebooks? Cambridge: Cambridge       University Press.

Marzooghi, R. (2016).curriculum Typology.Technology Review Journal (In press).

Marsh, C. (2004). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. Rout ledge Falmer: London and New York.

McCormick, Robert, Mary James (1983). Curriculum evaluation in schools. London: Taylor & Francis.

Mirshekari, Zeinab, Oujinezhad,Ahmadreza, Qeltash,Abbas. (2015).An evaluation of the compatibility of the intended,implemented and learned curricula: considering the natural sciences lesson at the 2rd grade of junior high school in neiriz city.Research in curriculum planning, vol. 12, no. 17(continuous 44).. [In persian]

Moamenimahmooii, M. (2010).Curriculum evaluation in higher education. Journal of education strategies. Period 2, no. 2.. [In persian]

Mulengeki, F., Lukindo, J., ogondiek, M., Mgogo, A. (2013).Curriculum Development and Evaluation. Faculty of Education. The open university of Tanzania.

Mukundan, J., Hajimohammadi,R.,Nimehchisalem,V. (2011). Developing an English language Textbook Evaluation checklist.Contemporary Issues in Education Research, Volume 4, Number 6

Nang, M.A. (2014). Evaluating the Communicative Effectiveness of the English Curriculum of a Language       School in Myanmar. Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 14:8

Nateghi, F., Yousefi, A., Yarmohammadian, H. (2009).designing evaluation pattern of Iran's secondary Schooling chemistry curriculum. Khorasgan University. Isfahan.. [In persian]

Oliva, P.F. (2008). Developing the Curriculum. Boston: Pearson press.

Ornstein, Allan C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2005). Curriculum - Foundations, Principles, and Issues,Fifth Edition, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Sheldon, L. E. (1988) Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4):237-246.

Shirvani, K. (2010).correspondence evaluation of high school English language textbooks and nongovernmental Schools from teachers points of view.Shahid university journal. 20^th year, new period, no.3. [In persian]

Stein, M & Kinder, D. (2004). Mathematics Evaluation Framework. University of Washington. Pennsylvani State Department of Education.

Taghipoorzahir,A. (2006). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction.Tehran,Agah pub. Co.. [In persian]

Taghipoorzahir,A. (2002). Introduction to the Educational and curriculum planning. Tehran,Agah pub. Co. [In persian]

Torkzade, J., Marzooghi,R., Mohammadi,M., Salimi,Gh., Keshavarzi, F. (2017). Developing effectivenes Evaluation framework of higher education curricula based on strategic approach. Curriculum researches Journal, Iran curriculum studies council, 6th period, 2nd no. [In persian]

TUNÇ. F. (2010). Evaluation of an English language teaching program at a public university using CIPP model. middle east technical university.

Yadgarzade, Gholamreza, Asgari, Ardeshir. (2018). Primary school science curriculum evaluation based on Teachers and province groups' leaders of Hamadan. Iran curriculum studies journal.6^th year, no. 23[In persian]

Yulia, yuyun. (2014). An evaluation of English language teaching programs in Indonesian junior high schools in the Yogyakarta province. School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context, RMIT University.

Zohrabi, M. (2016). The Application of Curriculum Components for Course Evaluation. Journal of English Language teaching and Learning, Tabriz University, No. 17