پیش‌بینی نظم دهی یادگیری براساس خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و علاقه به مطالعه با واسطه گری راهبردهای پردازش اطلاعات
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
1 - 1استادیار روان شناسی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: نظم دهی بیرونی, کلمات کلیدی: یادگیری خودنظم داده شده, خودکارآمدی تحصیلی, علاقه به مطالعه, و راهبردهای پردازش اطلاعات,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین نقش سازه‌های انگیزشی و راهبردهای پردازش اطلاعات در نظم دهی یادگیری (خودنظم دهی یادگیری و نظم دهی بیرونی) صورت گرفت. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق پرسشنامه‌ای شامل زیر مقیاس نظم دهی یادگیری (Vermunt, 1998)، مقیاس خودکارآمدی تحصیلی(Mccllory & Bunting, 2002) ، پرسشنامه علاقه به مطالعه(Schefele’s et al, 1993) ، و راهبردهای یادگیری از راهبردهای انگیزشی برای یادگیری (Pintrich & Degroot, 1994) برای 264 دانش آموز دبیرستانی شهرستان نور (138 دختر و 126 پسر) جمع‌آوری شد. نمونه‌ها براساس روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب و. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از تحلیل رگرسیون چندمتغیره استفاده شد. یافته‌های حاصل از به کارگیری روش آماری بارون و کنی نشان داد خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و علاقه به مطالعه با راهبردهای پردازش اطلاعات عمیق و سطحی و راهبردهای پردازش اطلاعات با نظم دهی یادگیری رابطه معناداری دارد و در نتیجه خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و علاقه به مطالعه به واسطه رابطه با راهبردهای پردازش اطلاعات، به طور معناداری نظم دهی یادگیری را پیش‌بینی می‌کند.
Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of motivational constructs(academic self-efficacy & study interest) and information processing strategies in regulation of learning (self-regulated learning and external regulation). The data were obtained from eleventh-grade students (138 female and 126 male) in Noor city. The sample was selected based on a multistage cluster random sampling. Our questionnaires in this study consisted of regulation of learning subscale from Inventory of Learning Styles (Vermunt, 1998), Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (Mccllory & Bunting, 2002), Study Interest Questionnaire (Schefele’s et al, 1993) and learning strategies from Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich & Degroot, 1994). The structural equations model has been used for data analysis. The results indicated that academic self-efficacy and study interest have significant effects on the deep and surface information processing strategies and information processing strategies have significant effects on regulation of learning. In result academic self-efficacy and study interest predict significantly regulation learning by mediating of effects on the information processing strategies.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Baumert, J. E., neubranal, M. prenzal, M. (2001). Self regulated learning as across-curricular competence. Max-Planck, OECD press. 1-26.
Berry, J. M. (1987). A self-efficacy model of memory performance. New York.
Braten, I., & Helge, I. S. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary. British Journal of Educational psychology, 75, 539-565.
Entwistle, N. J. (2000). Approaches to studying and level of understanding: The influences of teaching and assessment. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 15, 156-218.
Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407-428.
Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000) Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of psychology of Education, 15(1), 33-48.
Hatamzadeh arabi, E., Izadi, S., & Hashemi, S. (2015). The Comparison of the bilingual and the monolingual students' academic performance and academic self-efficacy in the elementary schools. Research in Curriculum Planning, 12 (17) (continus 44), 63-75.
Jensen, T. K. (2004). Alignment- how to bridge qualifications and the learning process.
Linnenbrink, E.A., & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The role of self efficacy belifes in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
McDonough, S. (2002). Adolescents and the extended residential learning program: A case
study.
McKeachine, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y., Smith, A. F., & Sharma, R. (1990). Teaching and Learning in the college classroom: A Review of Research literature. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Mcllory, D., & Banting, B. (2002). Personality, Behavior, and academic Achivement; Principles for Educators to inculcate and students to model, 27, 326-337.
Mellat, N., Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The role of epistemological beliefs, motivational constructs and Information processing strategies in regulation of learning. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1761-1769.
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K.A. (2005). The Conditional and Interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated Learning of College Students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46(7).
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4).
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents, motivation. Journal Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D, H. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory, research and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 41-50.
Regan, J., & Regan, L. (1995). Changes in university students' study processes during
the first year of their undergraduate courses in relation to age, gender and faculty.
Rozendal, J. S., Minnaert, M., & Boekaerts, M. (2005). The influence of teacher perceived administration of self-regulated learning on student's motivation and information-processing. Learning and Instruction, 15, 141-160.
Schefele, U. A., Krapp, K. P., & Wild, A. (1993). WintelerDer “Fagebon zum studieninteresse” (FSI). Diagnostica, 39, 335-351.
Schunk, D. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on childrens achivement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
Stroud, K., C. (2006). Development of the school motivation and strategies inventory.
Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. J. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97-116.
Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Learn. Instr. metacognitive, cognitive, and effective aspects of learning styles and strategies. Higher Education, 31, 25-50.
Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, G., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientation in strategies use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 149-170.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationship between learning strategies, conception of learning and learning orientation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4).
Yong, S. T., & Lew, T. Y. (2005). Deep learning approach among marketing students:
Adult versus youth learners.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies(pp.202-231). New York : Cambridge University Press
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinz-pons, M. (1990). Students' differences in self-regulated learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
