Prediction of regulation of learning based on academic self-efficacy & study interest with mediation of information processing strategies
Subject Areas : Research in Curriculum Planning
sara
ebrahimi
1
(1استادیار روان شناسی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران)
Keywords: academic self-efficacy, Key words: self-regulated learning, information processing strategies, study interest, external regulation,
Abstract :
Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of motivational constructs(academic self-efficacy & study interest) and information processing strategies in regulation of learning (self-regulated learning and external regulation). The data were obtained from eleventh-grade students (138 female and 126 male) in Noor city. The sample was selected based on a multistage cluster random sampling. Our questionnaires in this study consisted of regulation of learning subscale from Inventory of Learning Styles (Vermunt, 1998), Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (Mccllory & Bunting, 2002), Study Interest Questionnaire (Schefele’s et al, 1993) and learning strategies from Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich & Degroot, 1994). The structural equations model has been used for data analysis. The results indicated that academic self-efficacy and study interest have significant effects on the deep and surface information processing strategies and information processing strategies have significant effects on regulation of learning. In result academic self-efficacy and study interest predict significantly regulation learning by mediating of effects on the information processing strategies.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Baumert, J. E., neubranal, M. prenzal, M. (2001). Self regulated learning as across-curricular competence. Max-Planck, OECD press. 1-26.
Berry, J. M. (1987). A self-efficacy model of memory performance. New York.
Braten, I., & Helge, I. S. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary. British Journal of Educational psychology, 75, 539-565.
Entwistle, N. J. (2000). Approaches to studying and level of understanding: The influences of teaching and assessment. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 15, 156-218.
Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407-428.
Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000) Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of psychology of Education, 15(1), 33-48.
Hatamzadeh arabi, E., Izadi, S., & Hashemi, S. (2015). The Comparison of the bilingual and the monolingual students' academic performance and academic self-efficacy in the elementary schools. Research in Curriculum Planning, 12 (17) (continus 44), 63-75.
Jensen, T. K. (2004). Alignment- how to bridge qualifications and the learning process.
Linnenbrink, E.A., & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The role of self efficacy belifes in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
McDonough, S. (2002). Adolescents and the extended residential learning program: A case
study.
McKeachine, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y., Smith, A. F., & Sharma, R. (1990). Teaching and Learning in the college classroom: A Review of Research literature. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Mcllory, D., & Banting, B. (2002). Personality, Behavior, and academic Achivement; Principles for Educators to inculcate and students to model, 27, 326-337.
Mellat, N., Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The role of epistemological beliefs, motivational constructs and Information processing strategies in regulation of learning. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1761-1769.
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K.A. (2005). The Conditional and Interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated Learning of College Students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46(7).
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4).
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents, motivation. Journal Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D, H. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory, research and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 41-50.
Regan, J., & Regan, L. (1995). Changes in university students' study processes during
the first year of their undergraduate courses in relation to age, gender and faculty.
Rozendal, J. S., Minnaert, M., & Boekaerts, M. (2005). The influence of teacher perceived administration of self-regulated learning on student's motivation and information-processing. Learning and Instruction, 15, 141-160.
Schefele, U. A., Krapp, K. P., & Wild, A. (1993). WintelerDer “Fagebon zum studieninteresse” (FSI). Diagnostica, 39, 335-351.
Schunk, D. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on childrens achivement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
Stroud, K., C. (2006). Development of the school motivation and strategies inventory.
Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. J. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97-116.
Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Learn. Instr. metacognitive, cognitive, and effective aspects of learning styles and strategies. Higher Education, 31, 25-50.
Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, G., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientation in strategies use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 149-170.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationship between learning strategies, conception of learning and learning orientation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4).
Yong, S. T., & Lew, T. Y. (2005). Deep learning approach among marketing students:
Adult versus youth learners.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies(pp.202-231). New York : Cambridge University Press
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinz-pons, M. (1990). Students' differences in self-regulated learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
