Iranian EFL Learners' Attitudes toward the Application of Different Models of Dynamic Assessment to Listening Comprehension Instruction
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Mahshid Ghanaat
1
(English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran)
Fariba Rahimi Esfahani
2
(English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran)
Sajad Shafiee
3
(English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran)
Mehrdad Sepehri
4
(English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran)
کلید واژه: Dynamic Assessment, Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA), Listening comprehension, Group Dynamic Assessment (G-DA), Interactionist Dynamic Assessment (I-DA),
چکیده مقاله :
Simultaneous evaluation of the impact of different types of dynamic assessment on EFL learners' listening comprehension has never been conducted as far as the related literature discloses. Most of the studies connected with the dynamic assessment and various language skills have focused on speaking and writing performance. The present qualitative study aimed to examine Iranian EFL learners' attitudes toward the application of three models of dynamic assessment; namely, Interactionist Dynamic Assessment (I-DA), Group Dynamic Assessment (G-DA), and Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA to Listening Comprehension Instruction. For this purpose, the Preliminary English Test (PET) was administered to 140 Iranian EFL female learners in four English Language Institutes in Ahvaz, Iran, who were chosen through availability sampling, and 80 of them were selected as homogeneous participants of the study. Then, they were given a perception questionnaire intended to elicit their insights about applying the different types of dynamic assessment. Three parallel questionnaires were constructed, each consisting of 15 items, and asking the learners about the efficacy of interactionist dynamic assessment in the I-DA group, group dynamic assessment in the G-DA group, and computerized dynamic assessment in the C-DA group. The descriptive analysis of the respondents' answers revealed that the degree of the IDA, GDA, and CDA learners' positive attitudes towards the application of DA reached statistical significance. This finding implies that EFL teachers may need to deliberate on the positive influence of different dynamic assessment models on EFL learners' listening comprehension improvement and, therefore, provide them with more opportunities to interact.
Abliva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages, 57-86.
Alavi, S. M., and Taghizadeh, M. (2014). Dynamic assessment of writing: The impact of implicit/explicit mediations on L2 learners' internalization of writing skills and strategies. Educational assessment, 19(1), 1-16.
Alderson, J. C., Percsich, R., and Szabo, G. (2000). Sequencing as an item type. Language Testing, 17(4), 423-447.
Aljafreh, A., and Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The modern language journal, 78(4), 465-483.
Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576-598.
Babamoradi, P., Nasiri, M., Mohammadi, E. (2018). Learners' attitudes toward using dynamic assessment in teaching and assessing IELTS writing task one. International Journal of Language Testing 8(1), 1-15.
Ebadi, S., and Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners' academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 527-555.
Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realizing potential. Educational Review, 55(1), 15-32.
Gardner, S. (2010). SFL: A theory of language for dynamic assessment of EAL. NALDIC Quarterly, 8(1), 37-41.
Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging Discourses in the ESL Classroom: Students, Teachers, and Researchers. London: Continuum.
Glutting, J., and McDermott, P. (1990). Principles and problems in learning potential. Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children. Intelligence and achievement, 1, 296-347.
Hidri, S. (2019). Static vs. dynamic assessment of students' writing exams: a comparison of two assessment modes. International Multilingual Research Journal, 13(4), 239-256.
Haywood, H. C., and Lidz, C. S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., and Poehner, M. E. (2007). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 1(1), 49-72.
Lantolf, J. P., and Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33.
Mardani, M., and Tavakoli, M. (2011). Beyond Reading Comprehension: The Effect of Adding a Dynamic Assessment Component on EFL Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3).
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer Science and Business Media.
Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-491.
Poehner, M. E., and Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233-265.
Poehner, M. E., and van Compernolle, R. A. (2020). Reconsidering time and process in L2 dynamic assessment. In Toward a Reconceptualization of Second Language Classroom Assessment (pp. 173-195): Springer.
Sternberg, R.J., and Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tzuriel, D., and Shamir, A. (2002). The effects of mediation in computer-assisted dynamic assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 21-32.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Sociocultural theory. Mind in society, 6, 52-58
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language (A. Kozulin, Trans.) Cambridge, MA. Paper presented at the MIT Press.
