The Relationship between Iranian English Learners’ Linguistic Intelligence and their Writing Ability, and Writing Assessment Criteria
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)موسی احمدیان 1 , سمانه حسینی 2
1 - گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اراک
2 - کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان، دانشگاه اراک
کلید واژه: Writing, second language (L2), English as Foreign Language (EFL), Multiple Intelligence Theory (MIT), Multiple Intelligence Developmental Assessment Scales (MIDAS), linguistic intelligence (LI),
چکیده مقاله :
Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT) specifies at least eight human intelligences, one of which is linguistic intelligence. Gardner (1983) also calls this intelligence the intelligence of words, since it is mainly concerned with written and spoken forms of language. This new theory of intelligence which gives emphasis to learner variable has been used in language learning and teaching settings. The present paper studies possible relationship between L2 learners’ linguistic intelligence and their writing ability, and writing assessment criteria. 33 female homogeneous Persian speaking EFL learners participated in this study. The instruments used were the Multiple Intelligence Developmental Assessment Scales (MIDAS), designed by Shearer (1996), and the participants’ two writings. The linguistic intelligence index was taken from the MIDAS and the participants' average scores on two writing tasks were used as an index of writing products. The writings were scored based on Jacobs et al.’s scale of five criteria: content, organisation, language use, vocabulary, and mechanics. The correlational analysis of the results revealed a significant relationship between participants' linguistic intelligence and their performance on writing. Furthermore, the results of regression analysis showed that among all five criteria, vocabulary shows higher correlation with linguistic intelligence. Possible implications of the findings for language teaching and teaching writing will be discussed.
نظریهی هوش های چندگانه گاردنرحداقل 8 نوع هوشرا در انسان نشان می دهد؛ یکی از آن ها هوش زبانی استکه به شکل های گفتاری و نوشتاری زبان می پردازد. این روی کرد نوین از هوش تا کنون در کلیت و یا هرنوع هوش (از هوش های چندگانه ) بطور جداگانه درپاره ای از مطالعات یادگیری و آموزش زبان بکار گرفته شده است، اما در یادگیری و رشد مهارت نوشتاری و نیز معیارهای ارزیابی نوشتار چندان مورد توجه قرارنگرفته است . از این رو، پژوهش حاضر رابطه ی بین هوش زبانیِِانگلیسی آموزان ایرانی، توانایی نوشتاری آنها و ارزیابی این توانایی را بررسی می کند. بر این هدف، تعداد 33 زبان آموز زن و همگن از نظر هوش زبانی و سطح بسندگی زبانی (بر اساس آزمون میشیگان )انتخاب شدند . هوش زبانی آزمودنی ها با استفاده از که شیرِر ( 1996 ) طراحی کرده است، و توان (MIDAS) " پرسشنامه "مقیاس ارزیابی رشد هوش های چندگانه نوشتاری آن ها از طریق میانگین نمرات دومتن نوشته، بر پایه "مقیاس پنجگانه " ارزیابی یاکوبسن و دیگران — محتوی، نظم /انسجام، کاربرد زبان، واژگان، و ساختار —، مورد سنجش قرار گرفت . نتایج مقایسه آماری و تحلیل همبستگی رابطه معنا داری را بین هوش زبانی و توان نوشتاری آزمودنی ها نشان داد . نتایج تحلیل برگشت (رگرسیون) نیز حاکی از بیشترین همبستگی بین هوش زبانی و واژگان (از مقیاس پنجگانه ) بود. کاربردهای یافتههای تحقیق در آموزش زبان و بویژه آموزش و یادگیری توان نوشتاری بحث خواهد شد.
Ahmadian, M., & Hosseini, S. (2012). A Study of the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ Multiple Intelligences and their performance on writing. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 111-126.
Armstrong, T. (2002). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. (3rd edition). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
Armstrong, T. (2003). The multiple intelligences of reading and writing: making the words alive. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. (5th edit). United States of America: Longman.
Brauldi, A. C. (1996). Multiple Intelligences: Gardner's Theory. Eric Cleaninghouse on Assessment and Education. Washington Dc, Ed.
Chastain, K. (1998). Developing second-language skills theory and practice. (3rd edit). USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Christine, C. L. (2003). The effects of student multiple intelligence performance on integration of earth science concepts and knowledge within a middle grades science classroom. (MA Thesis, ED: 479329). Department of Teacher Education of Johnson Bible College.
Dobbs, V. (2002). The relationship between implementation of multiple intelligences theory in the curriculum and student academic achievement at a seventh-grade at-risk alternative school. Dissertation Abstract International, 62(9). UMI Number: 3027334.
Fahim, M., & Nejad Ansari, D. (2006). A multiple intelligence-based investigation into the effects of feedback conditions on EFL writing achievement. IJAL, 9(2), 51-78.
Farhady, H., Jaffarpour, A., and Birjandi, P. (2004). Testing Language Skills: Theory in Practice. Tehran, SAMT Publishers.
Furneaux, C. (1999). Recent materials on teaching writing. ELT Journal, 35(1), 56-61.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: a history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1995).Multiple intelligences as a catalyst. The English Journal, 84(8), 16-18.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the first century New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences after twenty years. American Educational Research Association, MA:02138.
Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of second language writing, 11,329-350.
Hashemi, J. (2009). The Relationship between emotional intelligence, language proficiency, and L2 learners' writing performance in Iranian EFL learners. (Unpublished M.A Thesis). Arak University, Arak, Iran.
Jacobs, H. L., & Zinkgraf, S. A., & Wormuth, D. R., & Hartfield, V. F., & HUghey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach (Electronic Version). Rowley, Massachussets: Newbury House. 91-104.
Kezar, A. (2001). Theory of MI: Implications for higher education. Innovative Education, 26(2), 141-154.
Laughlin, J. (1999). Multiple intelligences Inquiry, 4(2), 4-18, available at: http://www.vccaedu.org/inquiry/inquiry-fall99/i-42-laughlin.html
Mahdavi, B. (2008). The role of Multiple Intelligences (MI) in listening proficiency: a comparison of TOEFL and IELTS listening tests from an MI perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 10(3),1-14.
Marefat, F. (2007). Multiple intelligences: voices from an EFL writing class. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 32, 145-162.
McClaskey, J. (1995). Assessing student learning through multiple intelligences. The English Journal, 84(8), 56-59.
Piaget, J., (1952). The Origin of Intelligence in Children (trans. M. Cook). New York, International University Press.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and Intelligence, New York: Basic Books.
Price, S. D. (2001). Multiple intelligences theory and foreign language teaching. AAT:9999346.
Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press: USA.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2nd edit) (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Saricaoglu, A., & Arikan, A. (2009). A study of multiple intelligence, foreign language success, and some selected variables. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, ISSN: 1304-9496, 5(2), 110-122.
Sharifi, H. P. (2008). The introductory study of Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory, in the field of lesson subjects and the students’ compatibility. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 24, 11-20.
Shearer, C. B. (1996). Multiple intelligences developmental assessment scales (MIDAS). United States of America: Author.
Shearer, C. B. (2006). Criterion related validity of the MIDAS assessments. Kent, Ohio: MI Research and Consulting, Inc. www. MIResearch.org.
Smith, E. (2001). Implication of Multiple Intelligences theory for second language learning. Post- script, 2(1).
Vigotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language Trans. Alex Kozulin, The MIT Press, Cambridge, London, UK.
Visser, A. B., & Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006). Beyond g: putting multiple intelligences theory to the test. Intelligence, 34, 487-502.
