Departments and people who participate in the publication of the magazine must act according to this code of ethics.
The author and people active in the publication must have accepted the rules and ethical code of the publication and reached an agreement on it
1- Making fair decisions about articles
Decisions about articles should be made at every stage regardless of the race, gender, etc. of the authors.
2- Confidentiality of information
The personal information of the authors of the articles must be completely confidential and protected in any case for all the people who have access to it, such as the editor, etc.
3- Respecting the interests of individuals
The use of other people's research results must be done with reference and express written permission from the author.
4. Duties of editors and editorial board
4-1) Attention to the main goals of the magazine
4-2) Selection of refrees according to expertise
3-4) Registering and archiving documents of refereeing of articles.
4-4) Attention to the scientific abilities of refrees.
4-5) Evaluation and precision in sending the referees' comments
4-6) Serious and responsible participation of editorial board members in decision-making meetings.
5- Duties of referees
5-1) Helping the editorial board to make decisions.
The referees should help the editor of the journal in the quality, content and scientific review of the articles and help improve the quality and content of the articles.
5-2) Speed of action
The selected reviewers should immediately inform the editor of the journal about the results after the initial review
5-3) Confidentiality of information
All the information in the articles should be considered confidential for the referee and the referee should try to keep it.
3-5) Arbitration by providing scientific and transparent documentation and arguments.
4-5) attention to the sources used
6. Duties of authors
6-1) Presentation of scientific and standard articles.
The authors should prepare the articles scientifically and coherently, according to the standards of the publications.
2-6) Providing raw data if needed
6-3) Originality of the presented article
6-4) Failure to simultaneously publish an article or an accepted and printed article.
5-6) Mentioning appropriate referrals