The indication of moral education in semantics "must” from Kant and theologians of justice Perspective

Subject Areas : Research in Curriculum Planning

fakhteh mahini ¹ (1دانش آموخته دکتری فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران)
Alireza yousefy ² (2دانشیار گروه آموزش پزشکی مرکز تحقیقات آموزش پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران)
sayed hashem golestani ³ (3استاد گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران)
narges keshtiaray ⁴ (4استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران)

Received: 2017-10-17 Accepted : 2017-10-17 Published : 2016-04-20

Keywords: theologians of justice, Kant, assignments, moral education, must,

Abstract :

Knowing the indication semantics of "must” in moral education from kant and theologians of justice perspective gives better understanding about individual relationships in proportion to their values and duties. This research has done by linguistic and deductive analysis approaches with theoretical sampling method from all available literature as total numbering. The data has analyzed by using thematic, coding and deductive classification system. Results has shown that kant is seeking essential and general knowledge for morality and achieving to this is only through wisdom and the motivation to do assignments. Theologians of justice believe that although wisdom can guide individual to know the musts, it’s necessary to do actions for their ends. By establishing the ratio between "must” and goals of moral education, influenced factors on individual’s practical conduct have been found. These components has extracted the indication of moral education in three domains, “goals”, “teachers and parents role” and “individual role”.

References:

Ahmadpoor, M. (2013). Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy (ISCA). http://www.dte.ir/portal/home [Persion].
Alaee, G.H; Golestani, S.H; Keshtiaray, N. (2012). The analysis of considered intellectual knowledge in verses of the Holy Quran based on Tafsir Almizan and its implications on the aims of religious education curriculum. Research in Curriculum Planning. 33, 20-37[Persion].
Avani, Sh. (2011). Kantian ethics Duty-oriented or obligation-oriented. Speech at the Iranian Philosophical Society, http://www.ipso.ir [Persion].
Bagheri, Kh. (2008). An Introduction to Philosophy of Education of Iran. Volume 1. Tehran: Elmi & Farhangi [Persion].
Bagheri, Kh. (2010). Approaches and research methods in the philosophy of education. Tehran: Institute of Social and Cultural Studies [Persion].
Eslamian, M; Keshtiaray, N. (2014). Explanation of the components of the curriculum based on the educational approaches of Plato and Farabi.Research in Curriculum Planning. 40, 18-33[Persion].
Great Islamic Encyclopedia (2014): http://www.cgie.org.ir.
Kant, I. (1984). Education. Translated by Shokouhi, Gh, Tehran: Tehran University [Persion].
Kant, I. (1990). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Enayat, H. & Gheisari, A., Tehran: Khwarizmi [Persion].
Kant, I. (1997). Cririque of Practical Reason. Translated and Edited by Gregor, M., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2004). The Doctrine of virtue: Part 2 0f the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Sanei Darrebidy, M., Tehran: Nagsh-o-Negar [Persion].
Korsgaard, C. (2000). Aristotle and Kant on the Source of Value. Translated by Javadi, M., Organon Journal. 16, 95-120 [Persion].
Mo’allemi, H. (2006). Ethics. Qabasat. 39 & 40, 93-108 [Persion].
Motahari, M. (1987). Philosophy of Ethics. Tehran: Sadra [Persion].
Motahari, M. (1992). Education in Islam. Tehran: Sadra [Persion].
Omid, M. (1998). Must and must not, goodness and badness. Kheradnameh Sadra. 12, 43-59 [Persion].
Rabbani Golpayegani, A. (2005). Philosophy of Obligation in ‘Adliyah theologians view (1). Islamic theology. 56, 13-22 [Persion].
Rabbani Golpayegani, A. (2006). Philosophy of Obligation in ‘Adliyah theologians view (2). Islamic theology. 57, 5-20 [Persion].
Research Institute of Hawzah & University (2007). Educational Aims of Islam. Produced by Arafi et al. Tehran: Samt [Persion].
Scruton, R. (1996). Kant. translated by Ali Paya. Tehran: Tarh-e no [Persion].
Sharifi, AH. (2009). What is good? Which is bad? Qom: Imam Khomaini Educational and Research Institute [Persion].
Sullivan, R. J. (2010). Introduction to Kant's Ethics. translated by Fouladvand, E., Tehran: Tarh- e no [Persion].
Tousi, N. (1981). Naseri Ethics. Tehran: Khwarizmi [Persion].