Author commitment form Click here.
Authors 'Conflict of Interest Form Authors' Conflict Form Click here.
Article indexing process Click on the article indexing process on the website.
All sections and individuals who participate in the publication of the Journal of Historical Studies of the Qur'an and Hadith must act in accordance with this ethical charter. This means that the author and the people active in the journal (editor of the journal, members of the editorial board, editor-in-chief and publisher) must accept and agree on the ethical rules and charter of the journal.
The Ethics Charter in the Publishing Ethics Committee (COPE) is a guide for authors and contributors to publications. Publishing decisions, copyright laws and adaptations of other literary works must be observed by the publication and the rights of individuals are protected at the time of publication.
1. Make fair decisions about articles
Decisions about articles should be made at each stage, regardless of the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, or political philosophy.
2. Confidentiality of information
The personal information of the authors of the articles should be kept strictly confidential by all persons who have access to it (such as the editor, editorial board, internal and executive director of the journal, and other active actors (other than relevant authors) such as judges, consultants, editors and trusted publishers. And be protected in any case.
3. Observing the interests of individuals
The use of research results must be done with the explicit citation and written permission of the author.
4. Duties of editors and editorial board
A) Paying attention to the main goals of the magazine and trying to achieve them
B) Selection of judges according to the specialty of the academic discipline
C) Registration and archiving of arbitration documents
D) Avoiding any kind of discrimination based on age, gender, nationality, religion, etc. in the selection of judges.
E) Paying attention to the scientific abilities and moral obligation of the judges
F) Evaluation and accuracy in sending the opinion of the judges and assessing their accuracy
G) Serious and responsible participation of editorial board members in decision-making meetings.
5. Duties of judges
A) Assist in the decision of the editorial board.
The reviewers assist the editor of the journal in the qualitative, content and scientific review of the articles or help to improve and enhance the quality and content of the articles through the communication of the editorial members with the author.
B) Speed of action
The selected referees should, after initial review, have any problems in these areas. They should immediately notify the editor of the journal: Refusal to judge the article due to lack of expertise in the subject matter of the article, lack of time or anything like that. The reason for the busy time, lack of access to sufficient facilities and ....
C) Confidentiality of information
All information contained in the articles must be considered confidential to the arbitrator and the arbitrator must endeavor to maintain it.
D) Arbitration by presenting scientific and transparent documents and arguments
The judging of articles should be based on scientific documents and arguments and should be clearly stated and these documents should be presented to publications and authors and refrain from expressing taste, personal, racial and religious opinions, etc. in judging articles.
E) Paying attention to the sources used in the article
Paying attention to the sources used in the article is another task of the judges. All research, topics and citations used in the article should be accompanied by a complete reference in the bibliography.
F) Lack of judging articles for personal purposes
Referees should not accept articles for which the interests of certain individuals, institutions and companies are obtained or personal relationships are observed.
6. Duties of authors
A) Presenting scientific and standard articles.
Authors to prepare articles scientifically and coherently, according to the standard of publications. The method used in the article should be done accurately and objectively and the data should be reported correctly. The rights of other people in the article should be observed through full citation. Refrain from raising sensitive and immoral, tasteful and personal, racial and religious issues, and false and inaccurate information and translations of other people's works without mentioning the title in the article.
B) Provide raw data if required
The author should be asked to provide raw data, interviews, questionnaires, and other research tools as needed. Public access to this information (consistent with the ALPSP-STM statement) helps to improve the performance of articles.
C) The originality of the presented article
Articles submitted by authors should be the work of the author of the article, and any use of other people's research should be cited in the article.
D) Failure to publish and publish an article simultaneously in several journals
It is against the law to submit an article to several journals or articles published or accepted to other journals at the same time.
E) Mention the appropriate referral
Referrals include all books, publications and websites and other personal research in the bibliography.
F) Mention the person in charge and colleagues in the article and be careful not to include irrelevant names
The person in charge of the article is the person who has played a major role in preparing, preparing, designing and executing the article, and other authors are also mentioned as contributors to the article. Ensure names other than the authors of the article. Also, all authors have read the article and agreed to submit it.
G) Informing about the possible dangers
For humans or other living things
Any danger posed to humans or other creatures by any author's research should be clearly stated in the article.
H) Mention financial support
Authors need all backups