The linguistic techniques outlined in Shams's essays adequately assist the audience in expressing mystical concepts. Articles as the only work left by Shams are of particular importance in the history of literature, but have received less attention. The most important r
More
The linguistic techniques outlined in Shams's essays adequately assist the audience in expressing mystical concepts. Articles as the only work left by Shams are of particular importance in the history of literature, but have received less attention. The most important reason for this may be in the particular discourse genre of this book, what is at first glance noticed in the articles is the particular style of writing written as spoken notes, as if it were personal notes that never lost their spoken state. And it's not actually written. The oral discourse of the articles is clearly visible elsewhere in the book, and this has given rise to certain linguistic features in the book. The language used in Shams's essays is a specific language and somewhat different from the language of the earlier texts and of course the later periods. Shams's articles have their own style and style, including the use of names that can be better analyzed by analyzing their linguistic features. Onomatopoein is one of the features of spoken language that can easily represent natural situations in real language. The present study, which is a descriptive-analytic and library method designed to introduce some of the text into Shams's articles, shows that Shams has used the phonetic features of language in this work to explain the speaker's interpersonal expressions.
Manuscript profile
