Although space has usually been at the center of architectural debates since the beginning of the twentieth century, it has never been the basis of linguistic and poetic theories, and as a result, architectural poetry has not been understood and experienced as a space l
More
Although space has usually been at the center of architectural debates since the beginning of the twentieth century, it has never been the basis of linguistic and poetic theories, and as a result, architectural poetry has not been understood and experienced as a space language. Since the combination of knowledge in the contemporary period is of great importance, many commonalities can be found between architecture and literature.Based on the descriptive-analytical method, this article seeks to compare the category of space in the two arts of architecture and literature and its specific perceptions, and relying on philosophical critiques of poetry and new linguistic tendencies, similarities and differences between architecture and literature. Criticize and adapt the concept of space. One of the most important findings of this research is that the geometric language of architecture and texture of traditional cities with existential elements such as corridors, porches, courtyards and other spaces is a clear example of the language of residence and poetry of space. Architecture and language are both mediators of our encounter with the world because we are always present in architecture, just as we are always present in language. This resemblance reveals the spatiality of both. The poetry of space is the experientiality of language, so the construction of a revealing space on the one hand, and experiential and constructiveness on the other, is something that poetry must learn from architecture. But what architecture needsto learn from poetry isto usethe language ofarchitecture in a way thatis more than architecture
Manuscript profile
