Designing and Validating the Research Curriculum Pattern of Secondary High School Teachers Based on the Akker Pattern

Subject Areas : Education

Siamand Movloudi ¹ ( Ph.D. Graduate in Curriculum Development. Tabriz Branch. Islamic Azad University. Tabriz, Iran. )
Mohammad Ali Mojalal ² ( Assistant Professor of Curriculum Development. Bonab Branch. Islamic Azad University. Bonab. Iran. )
Sadegh Maleki Avarsin ³ ( Associate Professor of Education manegment. Tabriz Branch. Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. )
Zarin Dneshvar Haris ⁴ ( Assistant Professor of Consulting. Tabriz Branch. Islamic Azad University. Tabriz. Iran. )

Received: 2022-04-13 Accepted : 2022-06-07 Published : 2022-05-22

Keywords: Research, teachers, Akker pattern, Curriculum,

Abstract :

Introduction: This research has been done in order to design and validate the research curriculum of secondary high school teachers based on the Akker pattern in 2019-2020.Research Methodology: In terms of method, this research is a mixed type of research (quantitative-qualitative), and in terms of purpose, it is an applied one. In the qualitative approach, the research synthesis method was used and for its validation, the descriptive-survey method was used, implementing the content validity ratio method of Lawshe, and Mann–Whitney U. The statistical sample includes 20 top research teachers of the secondary high school in West Azerbaijan province and 10 curriculum elites and experts who have authored at least two books and 5 scientific research papers, who were selected through purposive sampling method up to the extent of data saturation.Findings: In this research by considering the Akker pattern, first the elements of the research curriculum are identified and then in order to answer the research questions, and based on semi-structured interviews, first the views of sample research teachers and elites and curriculum experts are extracted and then by coding the interviewees answers, the coding and the final categories were determined and the final pattern was developed based on it. The pattern obtained was validated by two groups of research teachers, elites and curriculum experts, and the two groups confirmed the validity of the pattern. 

References:

References

1- Akker, J. V. D. (2010). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W.

2- Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Dordrecht:

Kluwer Academic Publishers.

3- Aysegul Altun, Bilge Gok. (2017). Determining in- service training Program "characteristics given to teachers by conjoint analysis, Faculty of Education, Volume 5, Issue12,  Pages 13-19.

4- Bazargan, A. (2016). Action Research Training Booklet. Tehran: University of Tehran

Publishers. .(in Persian)

5- Borgia, Eileen T., Schuler, Dorothy (2009). Action Research in Early Childhood Education,

available, ERIC Digest. Volume 4(3), PP. 65–83 Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06532,

Turkey.

6- CHaychi, P.Gooya, Z ., Mortazi Mehrabani, N., Saki, R . (2006). Assessing the achievement of the goals of the teacher-researcher program, Quarterly Journal of Education, 85, pp. -107-133     

7- Dodani, S. LaPorte, R. E. (2011). Ways to strengthen research capacity in developing countries: effectiveness of a research training workshop in Pakistan. The Royal Institute of Public Health, 122, 578–587.

8- Eghbal, M. (2011). A Study of the Philosophical Foundations of the Action Research Method of the Researcher Teacher, Year 3, Issue 1, p.47.

9- Enayati, T. (2012). Investigating research barriers from the perspective of Behshahr middle school teachers. New approach In educational management. 3 (4), 205-189.(in Persian)

10- Erfani, N. (2016). The effectiveness of study courses on the knowledge and teaching skills of primary school teachers. Research in curriculum planning. Thirteenth year, second period, number 44, consecutive 21 pages 122 spring 2016. .(in Persian)

11- Fayaz, I. (2019). Interpretive representation of horizons, bottlenecks and solutions Teacher- researcher program as action research on teacher research. Journal of Educational Psychology, Allameh Tabatabai University, Vo Fifteenth, No. Fifty-four, Winter 98, pp. 91-111. .(in Persian)

12- Fazlollahi GHamshi, S., Noroozi., A . A., Maleki Tavana, M. (2011). Investigating the

Inhibitory Factors Affecting Farhangian Research. Curriculum Research, Year 9, Volume 2, Number 5 (32). .(in Persian)

13- Fichtman, dana. (2017). the reflective educators guide to classroom research learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. New york: press.

14- Golamkani, M. (2020). Understanding teachers' lived experiences of the quality of implementation of curriculum and action research projects in primary schools Mashhad, Master Thesis, Hekmat Razavi Institute of Higher Education. .(in Persian)

15- Hadighi, A. (2017). Investigating the attitude of Ramsar teachers about the effect of action research training on Improving the use of teaching elements, Master Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University. .(in Persian)

16- Hawk, maria (2017). Chatholic school teacher as action researcher: A project designed to empower and transform chatholic school teachers into instructional a dissertation. Submitted to the faculty of the graduate school of education in candidacy for the degree of doctor of education p87.

17- Hejazi, Y., Pardakhtchi, M., SHahpasand, M. (2019). Teacher professional development approaches. Tehran: University of Tehran, p. 48. .(in Persian)

18- Julien. B.L., Lexis. L., Schuijers. J., Samiric. T., McDonald.S. (2012). Using capstones to develop research skills and graduate capabilities: A case study from physiology .9, 3, 1-15.

19- KHosravi, M. (2013). Analysis of the acceptance of curriculum innovations in the higher education system. Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, (2), p. 9. .(in Persian)

20- Koutselini, M (2016). Participatory teacher development at schools: Processes   issues, Journal of Action Research, Volume 6(1).pp.29-48.

21- Leighton, J. (2017). "An Experimental Test of Student Verbal Reports and Expert Teacher Evalutions as a Source of Validity evidence for Test Development", Student Report and Teacher Evaluations, Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 103.

22- Meerah, T. S. M. Osman. K. Zakaria. E. Haji Ikhsan. Z. Krish. P. Choo Lian. D.K.Mahmod, D. (2012). Developing an Instrument to Measure Research Skills. Social Behavioral Sciences, 60, 630 – 636.

23- Munn, P. (2008). Bolding research capacity collaboratively: Canwetake Ownership of Our

Future? British Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 15-27.

24- Peterson, C.A., Hays Kimmons. J.E., Cole. J.S. (2008). Short-Term Effective of an Outcomes Research Training Curriculum Within a Coordinated Program. American Dietetic Association, 108, 120-124.

25- Rowly, j. (2017). Action research: an approach to student work based learning, Journal of Education and Training, Volume 45, number3.pp.131-138.

26- Saki, R. (2010). Teacher Research Literacy, Tehran: Danesh Afarin Publications. .(in Persian)

27- Trunk N, Arthur S. (2017). Action research and constructivism: two sides of the samecoin? Or, one side, International Journal of Management in Education, V.1, Number 1- 2,2007.Theory, method, and practice (pp. 177-199). Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.

28- Wacher, J. (2009). Training Needs Assessment of the Cooper Engineering Group   at ADC, MA thesis in Training and Development. University of

29- Whitehead, J. McNiff, J. (2016) Action Research: Living Theory, sage. Volume 5(2), PP.139–159. Wisconsin: Stout. 

30- Yoon, Kiok. Park, Youngin. Yong Hong, Seoung (2007). Elementary Teachers perception of Action Research in Korea. Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society held in April 14-18: Toronto.