Site selection of wind farms in Semnan province by using AHP method

Subject Areas : environmental management

Hasan  Rezaei ¹ (PhD in Agricultural Climatology, Lecturer in Geography, Imam Ali Officer University. *(Corresponding Author))
mokhtar  karami ² (Assistant professor, Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim sabzevari university.)
Fahimeh  Shakeri ³ (PhD student climatology Urban, Hakim sabzevari university.)

Received: 2014-10-21 Accepted : 2015-11-09 Published : 2021-02-19

Keywords: Geographic information system, Semnan, Site selection, Wind farm, Analytic Hierarchy Process,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: Limited fossil energy source and increase of energy demand is always pushed man to search for new energy sources as replacement. In this case the winds always have a special place in the new generation of energy sources. Semnan province with favourable topographical and relativity suitable situation is one of the best places for building a wind farm. Method: Therefore, in this research different criteria and sub criteria have been used to identify the suitable location for building wind farms in Semnan province, As the importance of information fusion, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method were employed for weighting the layers and the Expert Choice software implemented for this purpose. The Arc GIS program has been used for special analyses and overlapping of layers. After the analysis of information, according to the capacity of building wind farms, province of Semnan has been divided to four parts of great, good, normal and weak. Findings: At last, it is indicated that Geographic Information System as a Supportive Decision making system can be practical both in preparing of data and designing the priorities and giving expert's ideas dealing with different factors and also help the designers to select the proper location for the wind farms. Discussion and Conclusion: In this research, three regions have been determined, considering priority of overlaying and limitation of land and places, survey of priority area also considering the climate condition and personal observation have been determined that this places are Damghan, Nothwestern of Garmsar and and some part of eastern Shahroud.

References:

1. Amani, A., and Hosseini Shama Chi, A.2010, Investigation of wind energy potential in South Aras river basin stations, Journal of Geographical Space, 10(29),1-26. (In Persian)


2. Abdoli, H., Sari Sarraf, B., Hosseini Shama, Chi., 2009. Feasibility study of wind energy potential and its application in industrial development projects (Case study: East Azerbaijan province), Journal of Geographical Space, 9 (28), 74-57. . (In Persian)


3. Soltani, B., Gholamian, A., Dastjani Farahani, K., 2010, Investigation of wind energy potential in Amirabad port in order to feasibility of establishing a wind power plant ", Iranian Energy Journal, 13 (13), 1-15. (In Persian)


4. Zahedi, M, Salahi, B., Jamil, M, 2003. Calculation of wind density and power in order to use its energy in Ardabil, Geographical Research, 37 (53), 41-55. . (In Persian)


5. Baban, Serwan M, J, Tim P,.2000. Developing and applying a GIS assisted approach to locating wind farms in the UK, Renewable Energy 24(1), Pp. 59-71.


6. Bennui, A., Rattanamanee, P., Puetpaiboo وU., Phukpattaranont, P., Chetpa T, Tanan ondh, K., 2007. Site selection for large wind turbine using GIS. PSU-UNS International Conference on Engineering and Environment, Thailand,.1-6.


7. Prabamroong, A., Kasemsan, M., Wanvisa, Ch., and Nuttee, A.,2009. Development of a Gis Decision Support System for Wind Farm Installations in Thailand: Current State and Results. World Renewable Energy Congress– Asia, 690-695.


8. Mostafaeipour, A. A., Sedaghat, B., Dehghan-Niri, C., Kalantar, V., 2011. Wind Energy feasibility study for city of Shahrbabak in Iran, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,15, 2545- 2556. (In Persian)


9. Ahmed Shata, A.,2012. Potential wind power generation in South Egypt, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 1528–1536.


10. Masseran, N, A.M, Razali, K. Ibrahim., 2012. An analysis of wind power density derived from several wind speed density functions: The regional assessment on wind power in Malaysia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 6476- 6487.


11. Yasmina, A., Abdullatif, H., 2012.Wind energy in Egypt Economic feasibility for Cairo. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 3312- 3319.


12. Noorullahi, Y., Ashraf, M. A., Zamani, M., .2011. West Regional Wind Wind Energy Potential Assessment Using Geographic Information System (GIS), 8th National Energy Conference, Tehran.


13. Mohammadi, H., Rostami Jalilian, Sh. Taghavi, F. Shamsipour, A. A., 2012, Wind energy potential measurement in Kermanshah province, Natural Geography Research, 44 (2), 19-32.


14. Taylor, B.W., 2004. Introduction to Management Science.  Pearson Education Inc. New Jersey.


15. Bevilacqua, M. D., ’Amore, A., & Polonara, F., 2004. A Multi-Criteria Decision approach to Choosing the Optimal Blanching–Freezing System. Journal of Food Engineering, 63: 253-263.


16. Saaty, Thomas, L., 1990.Decision Making for Leaders.  Pittsburgh:  RWS Publications.


17. Saaty, Thomas L., 1996.the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.


18. Taha, H.A.,2003. Operations Research. Pearson Education Inc. Fayetteville.


19. Kunz, J., 2010.The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Eagle City Hall Location Options Task Force, pp.1-25.


20. Bowen, William M., 1990.Subjective judgments and data environment analysis in site selection, Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 14, Pp. 133-144.


21. Dey, P.K., Ramcharan, E.K., 2008. Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados, Journal of Environmental Management. Pp. 1384-1395.


22. Bertolini, M., Braglia, M., 2006.  Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract, International Journal of Project Management 24, pp. 422-430.


23. Moreno-Jimenez, J.M., 2005. A spread sheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP-group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation.Vol, 14. pp 89–108.