Impact of Cognitive Strategies and Graphic Organizers on Kurdish EFL Learners’ Writing Performance

Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation

Hunar Omer Mohammad Amin Padar ¹ , Fatemeh Mirzapour ²

1 - Nesa Nabifar, Ph. D Islamic Azad University, Tabriz branch [e-mail]
2 - Department of English Language Education, Soufian Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

Received: 2024-06-14 Accepted : 2024-07-15 Published : 2024-04-25

Keywords: Cognitive Strategies, graphic organizers, writing, EFL Learners,

Abstract :

The current research sought to explore the impact of cognitive strategies and graphic organizers on Kurdish EFL learners’ writing performance. One hundred fifty Kurdish EFL learners from a state university in Iraq's Kurdistan Region participated in this quasi-experimental research. The students were EFL learners in the TEFL field and belonged to two faculties. The learners were between the ages of 18 and 22. There were both males and females. After homogenizing them with the Oxford Placement Test (OPT), a sample of 99 participants from the study was chosen. The study sample was split into three groups: the experimental group on cognitive strategy, the graphic organizer group, and the control group. Each class had 33 learners. Three instruments were used to collect data: the Oxford placement test, the Pretest, and the Posttest of writing. They had thirteen sessions of treatment. After data collection, students' writing was rated by two raters, and their inter-reliability was calculated. Data analysis by Mancova revealed that both cognitive strategies and graph organizers positively impacted the writing skills of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. However, the group receiving graphic organizer treatment outperformed in its effect on learners' writing performance. The current research findings could assist creators of textbooks, educational organizers, materials developers, language institutions, educators, and students create a more effective environment for learning foreign languages and enhancing writing skills.

References:

Blair, R., Ormsbee, C., & Brandes, J. (2002). Using writing strategies and visual thinking software to enhance written performance of students with mild disabilities. ERIC EBS Co Host. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.
Cancino.M, Arenas. R, Herrera.C (2022).Exploring the relationship between L2 language proficiency, language learning strategies, and self-efficacy: evidence from chilean classrooms.Revista de Lingüísticay Lenguas Aplicadas 17:1-9. DOI: 10.4995/rlyla.2022.16122.
Chanderan, V., & Hashim, H. (2022). Language Learning Strategies Used by ESL Undergraduate Students. Creative Education, 13, 768-779. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.133049
Chasanatun, T. W., & Lestari, S. "The Development of Learning Material in Teaching Writing used Project Based Learning with Graphic Organizer Concept." Proc., International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2017), Atlantis Press, 92-96.
Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic Organizers and Students with Learning Disabilities: a Meta-Analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948710376661.
Fisher, J. B., & Schumaker, J. B. (1995). Searching for Validated Inclusive Practices: A Review of the Literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1-20
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary educational psychology, 30(2), 207-241.
Heng, Pu and Liu(2023).The effects of genre on the lexical richness of argumentative and expository writing by Chinese EFL learners. Sec. Educational Psychology. Volume 13, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082228
Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Idris, N., Isa, H. M., Zakaria, N. N. N., Taib, N. A. M., Ismail, S., & Rahmat, N. H. (2022). An Investigation of the Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in Foreign Language Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(2), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i2/12152
Nath, S. (2021). Planned instruction incorporating knowledge about cognition and its effects on general metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in non-native ESL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8(1), 119-135.
Nagao, A. (2019). The SFL Genre-based Approach to Writing in EFL Contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. Volume 4, Issue 1, Springer Open, PP1-18.
Navarro A., Muelas. A. (2015). Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 165(6):217-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.625
Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Omowumi, A. (2023). Effects of Graphic Organizer and Word Wall on the Academic Performance of Primary School Pupils in English Studies in Oyo State. Journal of Educational Research, 108(4), 58-58.
Pennequin, V., Sorel, O., & Fontaine, R. (2010). Motor planning between 4 and 7 years of age: Changes linked to executive functions. Brain and Cognition, 74(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.07.003
Pinto. L, Koay. S.A, Engelhard. B, Yoon. A.M, Deverett. B, Thiberge. S.Y, Witten. I.B, Tank. D.W, Brody. C.D (2018) An Accumulation of Evidence Task Using Visual Pulses for Mice Navigating in Virtual Reality Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 12:36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00036
Saadu, O., Raheem, A., & Yusuf, B. (2022). The Effect of the Graphic Organizer Method on the Academic Performance of Primary School Pupils in Atiba, LGA, Oyo State. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 58-58.
Sun, Qiyu & Zhang, Lawrence Jun (2022). Understanding learners’ metacognitive experiences in learning to write in English as a foreign language: A structural equation modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Tan, M. and Le, Q.V. (2019) EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, Long Beach, 9-15 June 2019, 6105-6114. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/tan19a.html
Wirahyuni and Martha (2023).Cognitive Strategies on Language Learning. DOI: 10.2991/978-2-494069-29-9_24