بررسی تطبیقی ژانر محور راهبرد و مرحله در قسمت بحث مقالات تحقیقاتی رشته روانشناسی بین نویسندگان انگلیسی و فارسی زبان

Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation

Zeinab  Ariarid ¹ (MA in TEFL, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran)
Rajab  Esfandiari ² (Assistant Professor, English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran)

Received: 2021-07-25 Accepted : 2021-07-25 Published : 2021-07-01

Keywords: راهبرد, نویسندگان ایرانی, پیکره, نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان, تحلیل ژانر محور,

Abstract :

نویسندگان غیرانگلیسی زبان که به دنبال انتشار نتایج مطالعات علمی خود در مجلات بین المللی هستند به دلیل عدم آشنایی با قراردادهای حاکم بر ژانر مقالات تحقیقاتی ممکن است با چالش هایی مواجه گردند. مطالعه حاضر با دو هدف صورت گرفته است: (الف) شناسایی راهبرد ها و مراحلی که قسمت بحث مقالات روانشناسی را تشکیل می دهند و (ب) بررسی تفاوت های بین راهبرد ها و مراحل به کار رفته در مقالات روانشناسی که توسط نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان و نویسندگان ایرانی به زبان انگلیسی نگارش شده اند. جهت حصول این اهداف، یک پیکره انگلیسی و یک پیکره ایرانی هر یک با پنجاه مقاله انگلیسی روانشناسی شکل گرفت. پیکره انگلیسی متشکل از مقالات نگارش یافته توسط نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان بود و پیکره ایرانی از مقالات نوشته شده توسط نویسندگان ایرانی تشکیل می شد. مدلل بکار رفته در مقاله حاضر مدل سویلز بود. داده ها هم به صورت کمی و هم به صورت کیفی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. برای تحلیل داده های کمی از آزمون خی دو استفاده شد و داده های کیفی به صورت محتوایی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. بر اساس تحلیل ژانر محور صد مقاله  که معرف پنج زیر شاخه اصلی رشته روانشناسی بودند (بالینی، شناختی، رشد، تربیتی، و اجتماعی)، یک مدل "راهبرد-مرحله" جدید با شش راهبرد و ده مرحله برای قسمت بحث مقالات روانشناسی پیشنهاد شد. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از وجود تفاوت های آماری معنادار بین نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان و نویسندگان ایرانی در خصوص به کارگیری یک راهبرد و تعدادی از مراحل بود. برخلاف نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان، نویسندگان ایرانی اغلب قادر به استفاده از تمامی مراحل جهت آشکارسازی عملکرد کلی یک راهبرد خاص نبودند. تحقیق حاضر با بیان تعدادی از پیامدهای نظری و آموزشی برای فراگیران رشته روانشناسی که از انگلیسی برای اهداف آکادمیک استفاده می کنند و متخصصان انگلیسی برای اهداف ویژه که به تدریس دوره های انگلیسی برای اهداف آکادمیک مشغولند، به پایان می رسد.

References:

Adel, S. M. R., & Ghorbani Moghadam, R. (20150. A comparison of moves in conclusion sections of research articles in psychology, Persian literature and applied linguistics. Teaching English Language, 9(2), 167-191.

Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2008). Genre analysis: An investigation of the discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 4(1), 39–63.

Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis on discussion section of research articles in Indonesian written by Indonesian speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 50–70.

Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241–251.

Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144.

Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre activity of experimental articles in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Behtary, S., & Davaribina, M. (2013). Genre variation and its impact on EFL students’ reading comprehension. ESP Across Cultures, 10(1), 75–81.

Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 165-186.

Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4–18.

Bonn, S. V., & Swales, J. M. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93 – 108.

Bowles, H. (2012). Analyzing languages for specific purposes discourse. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1), 43–58.

Bruce, I. (2008). Cognitive genre structures in methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 38–54.

Chang, C.-F., & Kuo, C.-H. (2011). A corpus-based approach to online materials development for writing research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 222–234.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57–70.

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133–154.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text. Discourse analysis monographs (pp. 129–146). Birmingham, U.K.: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219–228). London: Routledge.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duszak, A. (1994). Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(3), 291–313.

Nwogu, K. N. (1991). Structure of science popularizations: A genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10(2), 111-123.

Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. L. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: Letter of application. English for Specific Purposes, 20(2), 153–167.

Hill, S. S., Soppelsa, B. F., & West, G. K. (1982). Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), 333–347.

Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337.

Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113–121.

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29.

Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722.

Jalilifar, A., & Shahvali, P. (2013). Writing suggestions for further research in Iranian applied linguistics theses: A generic and metadiscoursal investigation. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 79–105.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 73–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2011). Civil engineering research article introductions: Textual structure and linguistic characterization. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 55–84.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2012). In search of the generic identity of the discussion section: Three engineering sub-disciplines. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 4(2), 1–26.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2012). In search of the generic identity of the discussion section: Three engineering sub-disciplines. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 4(2), 1–26.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37(1),74–86.

Kardas, E. P. (2014). History of psychology: The making of a science. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Khany, R. (2017). Textuality in EAP research articles: A genre analysis. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 165-189.

Khorramdel, M., & Farnia, M. (2017). Comparative generic analysis of discussion sections of English and Persian dentistry research articles. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 28-43.

Kwan, B. S. C., & Chan, H. (2014). An investigation of source use in the results and the closing sections of empirical articles in information systems: In search of a functional-semantic citation typology for pedagogical purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14(1), 29–47.

Martín, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43.

Martín, P., & Pérez, I. K. L. (2014). Convincing peers of the value of one’s research: A genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts. English for Specific Purposes, 34(1), 1–13.

Martínez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 103–123.

Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economic texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 3–22.

Mohan, B. A., & Lo, W. A. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 515–534.

Nwogu, K. N. (1991). Structure of science popularizations: A genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10(2), 111-123.

Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119–138.

Parkinson, J. (2011). The discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 164–175.

Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479–497.

Peacock, M. (2011). The structure of the methods section in research articles across eight disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 99–124.

Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365–385.

Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 299–310.

Sell, R. (1991). Literary genre and history: Questions from a literary pragmatist for socio-semioticians. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Approaches to the analysis of literary discourse (pp. 1–35). Abo: Abo Academy Press.

Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 238–251.

Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 45–57.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tessuto, G. (2015). Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37(1),13–26.

Zhang, Y., & Hu, J. (2010). A genre-based study of medical research article introductions: A contrastive analysis between Chinese and English. The Asian ESP Journal, 6(1), 72–96.