انتخاب بهترین مدل مناسب در ارزیابی تشخیصی شناختی

Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation

Niloufar Shahmirzadi ¹ , Masood Siyyari ² , Hamid Marashi ³ , Masoud Geramipour ⁴

1 - Department of Foreign Languages, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of Foreign Languages, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of Foreign Languages, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Assistant Professor of Assessment, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2020-12-29 Accepted : 2020-12-29 Published : 2020-07-01

Keywords:

References:

References

Alderson, J. C. (1990a). Testing reading compre- hension skills (Part one). Reading in a Foreign Language, 6(2), 425–438.

Alderson, J. C. (1990b). Testing reading compre- hension skills (Part two): Getting stu- dents to talk about taking a reading test (A pilot study). Reading in a Foreign Language, 7(1), 465–503.

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign lan- guage proficiency: The interface be- tween learning and assessment. London: Continuum.

American Educational Research Association (AERA), A. P. A. A., & National Coun- cil on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educa- tional and psychological testing. Wash- ington, DC: American Psychological As- sociation.

Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strate- gies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 1-33.

Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In J. D. D. E. E. E. In P. L. Carrell (Ed.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37-55): Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.

Aryadoust, V. (2011). Application of the fusion model to while-listening performance tests. SHIKEN: JALT Testing and Eval- uation SIG Newsletter, 15(2), 2-9.

Baghaei, P., & Ravand, H. (2015). A cognitive processing model of reading comprehen- sion in English as a foreign language us- ing the linear logistic test model. Learn- ing and Individual Differences, 43, 100- 105

Chen, J., de la Torre, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Rel- ative and absolute fit evaluation in cog- niitve diagnostic modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 123-140. Chen, H., & Chen, J. (2016). Retrofitting non- cognitive-diagnostic reading assessment under the generalized DINA model framework. Language Assessment Quar-

terly, 13(3), 218-230.
Chen, W. H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local depen-

dence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 265– 289.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mourton & Company.

Christie, F., Devlin, B., Freebody, P., Luke, A., Martin, J. R., & Threadgold, T. (1991). Teaching English literacy: A project of

Journal of language and translation, Volume 10, Number 3, 2020

national significance on the preservice preparation of teachers for teaching Eng- lish literacy (Vol. 1): Canberra: Depart- ment of Employment, Education and Training.

Clapham, C. M. (1996). The development of IELTS: A study of the effect of back- ground knowledge on reading compre- hension. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press.

Clauser, B. E., & Mazor, K. M. (1998). Using statistical procedures to identify differen- tial item functioning test items. Educa- tional Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(1), 31-44.

Cooper, M. (1984). Linguistic competence of practiced and unpracticed non-native readers of English. In I. J. C. A. A. H. Urquhart (Ed.), Reading in a foreign lan- guage (pp. 122-138). London: Longman.

Council, N. R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educa- tional assessment. Washington: National Academy Press.

Cronbach, L. M., P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulle- tin, 52(4), 281–302.

de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2004). Higher- order latent trait models for cognitive di- agnosis. Psychometrika, 69(3), 333-353.

de la Torre, J., & Lee, Y. S. (2013). Evaluating the Wald test for item-level comparison of saturated and reduced models in cog- nitive diagnosis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(4), 355-373.

Ellis, B. B., & Raju, N. S. (2003). Test and Item Bias: What they are, What they aren't, and How to detect them. Educational Re- sources Information Center (ERIC).

Farashaiyan, A. T., K. H. (2012). On the relation- ship between pragmatic knowledge and langugae proficiency among Iranian male and female undrgraduate EFL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Langauge Studies, 18, 33-46.

11

Farr, R. (1992). Putting it all together: Solving the reading assessment puzzle. The Reading Researcher, 46(1), 26–37.

Freedle, R., & Kostin, I. (1993). The prediction of TOEFL reading item difficulty: impli- cations for construct validity. Language Testing, 10(2), 133-170.

Furr, M. R., & Bacharach, V. R. (2007). An in- troduction: Psychometrics: Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Gao, L., & Rogers, W. T. (2010). Use of tree- based regression in the analyses of L2 reading test items. Language Testing, 28(2), 1-28.

Gaylord, R. H. (1955). Conceptual consistency and criterion equivalence: a dual ap- proach to criterion analysis. Unpublished Manuscript as cited in Cronbach & Me- heel (PRB Research Note No. 17). Cop- ies obtainable from ASTIA-DSC, AD-21 440.

Glaser, R. (1994). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. Educational Measure- ment: Issues & Practice, 13(4), 6-8.

Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholin- guistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(1), 126-135.

Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In I. J. F. K. I. G. Mattingly (Ed.), Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Grabe, W. (1988). Reassessing the term „interac- tive'. In J. D. In P. L. Carrell, & D.E. Eskey (Ed.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 57-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375–406.

Grabe, W. (2000). Developments in reading re- search and their implications for comput- er-adaptive tests of reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second langauge: Moving from theory to practice. New

12 Selecting the Best Fit Model in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment:...

York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers‟ summative practic- es and assessment for learning-tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,

16(2), 207-223.
Hemmati, S. J., Baghaei, P., & Bemani, M.

(2016). Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling of L2 Reading Comprehension Ability: Providing Feedback on the Reading Per- formance of Iranian Candidates for the University Entrance Examination. Inter- national Journal Langauge Testing, 6(2).

Henson, R. A., Templin, J. L., & Willse, J. T. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74(2), 191-210.

Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teach- ers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jang, E. E. (2005). A validity narrative: Effects of reading skills diagnosis on teaching and learning in the context of NG TOEFL. Unpublished doctoral disserta- tion, University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign. [Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3182288)].

Jang, E. E. (2009). Cognitive diagnostic assess- ment of L2 reading comprehension abili- ty: Validity arguments for Fusion Model application to LanguEdge assessment. Language Testing, 26(1), 31-73.

Kamata, A., & Vaughn, B. K. (2004). An intro- duction to differential item functioning analysis. Learning Disabilities: A Con- temporary Journal, 2(2), 49-69.

Kellis, M., & Silvernail, D. (2002). Considering the place of teacher judgment in Maine‟s local assessment systems: Maine: Center for Educational Policy, Applied Re- search, and Evaluation, University of Southern Maine.

Khodaii, E. (2009). Effective Factors in Passing MA Entrance Examination. Higher Edu-

cation Studies and Planning Quarterly,

54, 15-34.
Kim, A.-Y. (2015). Exploring ways to provide

diagnostic feedback with an ESL place- ment test: Cognitive diagnostic assess- ment of L2 reading ability. Langauge Testing, 322(2), 227-258.

Kintsch, W. v. D., T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(34), 363–394.

LaBerge, D. S., S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.

Langer, J. A. A., R. L. (1992). Curriculum re- search in writing and reading. In I. P. Jackson (Ed.), The handbook of curricu- lum research (pp. 687–725). New York: Macmillan.

Lee, Y. W., & Sawaki. (2009a). Cognitive diag- nosis and Q-matrices in language as- sessment. Language Assessment Quarter- ly, 6(1), 169-171.

Lei, P. W., & Li, H. (2016). Fit indices' perfor- mance in choosing cognitive diagnostic models and Q-matrices.Applied Psycho- logical Measurement. 40(6), 405-417.

Li, H. (2011). Evaluating langauge group differ- ences in the subskills of reading using a cognitive diagnostic modeling and diffe- rential skill functioning approach. Un- published doctoral disserttaion, Penn State University, State College, PA.

Louden, W., Rohl, M., Gore, J., McIntosh, A., Greaves, D., Wright, R. (2005). Prepared to teach: An investigation into the prepa- ration of teachers to teach literacy and numeracy. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

Lumley, T. (1993). The notion of subskills in reading comprehension tests: An EAP example. Language Testing, 10(3), 211- 234.

Matters, G. (2006). Assessment approaches in Queensland senior science syllabuses. A

Journal of language and translation, Volume 10, Number 3, 2020

report to the Queensland Studies Au-

thority. Brisbane: ACER.
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the

validity of standards in performance as- sessment. Educational Measurement. Is- sues and Practice, 14(4), 5-8.

Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a mul- tiple-choice test of reading comprehen- sion. Language Learning, 6(2), 199-215.

Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word know- ledge in a theory of reading comprehen- sion. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37.

Perfetti, C. A., Yang, C-L., & Schmalhofer, F. (2008). Comprehension skill and word- to-text processes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 303-318.

Ranjbaran, F., & Alavi, S. M. (2017). Developing a reading comprehension test for cogni- tive diagnostic assessment: A RUM analysis. Studies in Educational Evalua- tion, 55, 167-179.

Ravand, H. (2015). Application of a cognitive diagnostic model to a high-stakes reading comprehension test. Journal of Psychoe- ducational Assessment, 1-8.

Ravand, H. (2016). Application of a cogniitve diagnostic model to a high stakes reading comprehension test. Journal of Psychoe- ducational Assessment, 34(8), 782-799.

Ravand, H., & Robitzsch, A. . (2015). Cognitive diagnostic modeling using R. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 20(11), 1-12.

Ravand, H., Barati, H., & Widhiarso, W. (2012). Exploirng diagnostic capacity of a high- stakes reading comprehension test: A pe- dagogical demonstration. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 3(1), 12-37.

Rost, D. H. (1993). Assessing different compo- nents of reading comprehension: Fact or fiction. Language Testing, 10(1), 79-92.

Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (2004). Differential item functioning analysis: Detecting DIF items and testing DIF hypotheses. In I. D. Kaplan (Ed.), The value Sage hand-

13

book for social sciences (pp. 107-115):

Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rumelhart, D. (1977). Toward an interactive

model of reading. In I. S. Domic (Ed.): Attention and performance (VI). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: the building blocks of language. In B. C. B. In R. J. Spiro, & W. F. Brewer (Ed.), Theoretical issues on reading comprehension (pp. 33- 58): Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1991). Reading expository prose at the post-secondary level: The in- fluence of textual variables on L2 read- ing comprehension (a genre-based ap- proach). Reading in a Foreign Language, 8(1), 645–662.

Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A criti- cal perspective on the use of language tests. Harlow, England: Longman.

Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implica- tions of cognitive psychology for educa- tional measurement. In I. R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 263-331). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.

Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive- compensatory model of individual differ- ences in the development of reading flu- ency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.

Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teach- ers‟ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany, practices NY: State University of New York Press.

Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educa- tional Measurement: Issues & Practice, 20(4), 345-354.