Undergraduate Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language: a Gendered Perspective
Subject Areas : Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation
1 -
2 -
Keywords: gender differences, academic writing, Argumentative Writing, English as a Foreign Language, learner corpus,
Abstract :
Determining whether gender-related differences exist in the linguistic characteristics of writing in formal contexts is one of the concerns of recent research on gender in second language writing. This study aimed to explore gender differences in undergraduate argumentative writing in English as a foreign language (EFL) in terms of lexical and discoursal features. Around 100 Persian-speaking male and female EFL learners with insignificant differences in English proficiency at the time of the study and with similar background literacy experiences performed an opinion-based writing task under exam conditions. Combined corpus analysis and discourse analysis techniques were used to describe and compare their texts in terms of writing quality, lexical properties, and rhetorical organization. Results showed that a) male learners received significantly higher mean scores in the content and organization of their argumentative writing (t= 2.03 and 2.08 respectively, p≤ 0.04); b) female EFL learners wrote less assertively and expressed positions more obscurely as shown in the analysis of their topic sentences; and c) While male learners used both inductive and deductive overall organizations for their texts, most female learners (74.4%) wrote more deductively. Results of concordance and keyword analyses through Wordsmith Tools also illustrated that learners’ social and ideological contexts of gender contributes to their approach to academic writing in English.
References
Argamon, S., M. Koppel, Fine, J. & Shimoni, A. R. (2003). Gender, genre, and
writing style in formal written texts. TEXT- Interdisciplinary Journal for the
Study of Discourse. 23(3), 321-346.
Barnbrook, G. (1996). Language and computers: A practical introduction to
the computer analysis of language. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
Belcher, D. (2001). Does Second Language Writing Theory Have Gender? In
Silva, T. & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.). On second language writing (pp. 59-73).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Bermudez, A. and Prater, D. (1994). Examining the Effects of Gender and
Second Language Proficiency on Hispanic Writers. Bilingual Research
Journal. 18 (3&4), 47-62.
Berninger, V., Nielsen, K. H., Abbott, R. D., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W.
(2008). Gender differences in severity of writing and reading disabilities.
Journal of School Psychology, 46 (2), 151-172.
Berryman-Fink, C. L. & Wilcox, T. R. (1983). A multivariate investigation of
perceptual attributions concerning gender appropriateness in language, Sex
Roles, 9 (6), 663-681.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating
language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bidlake, E. (2007). Language Learning As a Gendered Experience. Retrieved
december 8, 2010 from:
http://research.ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS/vol4_documents/BIDLAKE.pdf.
Blackburn, M. (2005). Disrupting Dichotomies for Social Change. Research in
the Teaching of English, 39 (4), 398-419.
Breland, H. & Y. Lee (2007). Investigating Uniform and Non-Uniform Gender
DIF in Computer-Based ESL Writing Assessment. Applied Measurement in
Education, 20 (4), 377-403.
Zare-ee, A. & Kaur, Sh. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 2(1) (2013), 123–145
143
Butler, J. A. & M. A. Britt (2011). Investigating Instruction for Improving
Revision of Argumentative Essays. Written Communication, 28 (1), 70-82.
Clarke, P. (1994). Men and women's performance in Tripos examinations
1980-1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpepper, J. (2009). Keyness: words, parts of speech and semantic categories
in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International
Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14 (1), 29-59.
Davis, K. A. & E. Skilton-Sylvester (2004). Looking Back, Taking Stock,
Moving Forward: Investigating Gender in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 38
(3), 381-404.
De Haan, P. (1992). The optimum corpus sample size. In Leitner, G. (ed.), New
directions in English language corpora: Methodology, results, software
development (pp. 1-19). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Don, Z., G. Knowles, & Fatt, C. K. (2010). Nationhood and Malaysian identity:
a corpus-based approach. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of
Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(3), 267-287.
Eckert, P. & Mcconnel-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge:
CUP.
Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: implications for second language
acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 421-446.
Ellis, R. (1995). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford
University Press
Farhady, H., Hezaveh, F. F., & Hedayati, H. (2010). Reflections on Foreign
Language Education in Iran. TESL-EJ, The Electronic Journal for English
as a Second Language. 13 (4), 1-18.
Francis, B., Read, B., & Melling, L. (2003). University lecturers’ perception of
gender and undergraduate writing. British Journal of Sociology of
Education, 24, 357-373.
Gavioli, L. (2005). Exploring corpora for ESP learning. Amsterdam: John
Benjamin.
Ghadessy, M., Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. (2001). Small corpus studies and
ELT: theory and practice. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Granger, S. (Ed.) (1998). Learner English on computer. London: Addison
Wesley Longman.
Hirose, K. (2003). Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the
argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 12 (2), 181-209.
Zare-ee, A. & Kaur, Sh. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 2(1) (2013), 123–145
144
IRPHE. (2010). Iranian Research and Planning in Higher Education: the statistics
of higher education. http://www.irphe.ir/FA/Statistics/Stat_index.aspx.
(Retrieved on 20 April 2011).
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B.
(1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA:
Newbury House.
Jalali H, & Ghayoomi S. (2010). A comparative qualitative study of lexical
bundles in three academic genres of applied linguistics. MJAL, 2 (4), 323-
333.
Jiménez Catalán, R. & Ojeda Alba, J. (2008). The English vocabulary of girls
and boys: Evidence from a quantitative study. Theoretical and
methodological approaches to gender and language study. In L. Litosseliti,
H. Sauton, K. Harrington, & J. Sunderland (eds.), Gender and Language
Research Methodologies. (pp. 103-115) London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, S. & D. Myhill (2007). Discourses of Difference? Examining Gender
Differences in Linguistic Characteristics of Writing. Canadian Journal of
Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 30 (2), 456-482.
Kanaris, A. (1999). Gendered journeys: Children's writing and the construction
of gender. Language and Education, 13 (4), 254-268.
Kubota, R. (1998). An investigation of L1-L2 transfer in writing among
Japanese university students: Implications for contrastive rhetoric. Journal
of Second Language Writing, 7 (1), 69-100.
Kubota, R. (2003). New approaches to gender, class, and race in second
language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1): 31-47.
Lakoff, R.T. (1977). Women’s language. Language and Style, 10 (4), 222-247.
Larsen-Freeman, D., Long, M. H., & Jiang, Z. (1991). An introduction to
second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
Laufer, B. & P. Nation (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2
written production. Applied Linguistics, 16 (3), 307-316.
Leech, G. (1991). English corpus linguistics: Studies in honor of Jan Svartvik.
In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), The state of the art in corpus
linguistics. (pp. 8-29) London: Longman.
Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik
(Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82,
Stoskholm, 4-8 August 1991. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McEnery, T. & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics. Second edition.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Zare-ee, A. & Kaur, Sh. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 2(1) (2013), 123–145
145
Mulac, A. & T. L. Lundell, (1994). Effects of gender-linked language
differences in adults' written discourse: Multivariate tests of language
effects. Language & Communication, 14 (3).
Ong, J. & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and
lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of
Second Language Writing, 19 (2), 218–233.
Peterson S., & Kennedy, K. (2006). Sixth grade teachers' written comments on
student writing: Genre and gender influences. Written Communication, 23
(1), 36- 62.
Rayson, P. Leech, G. & Hodges, M. (1997). Social differences in the use of
English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational component of the
British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2 (1),
133-52.
Shamsudin, S. & Mahady, Nurul Ros A. (2010). Corpus Linguistics based
error analysis of first year Universiti Teknologi Malaysia students’ writing.
Unpublished Ph.D. Disseration. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.
Schmenk, B. (2004). Language learning: a feminine domain? The role of
stereotyping in constructing gendered learner identities. TESOL quarterly,
38 (3), 514-538.
Scott, M. (2004). Oxford Wordsmith Tools Version 4. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Shavarini, Mitra, K. (2005). The feminization of Iranian Higher Education.
Review of Education, 51 (4), 320-347.
Simkins-Bullock, J. A. & B. G. Wildman, (1991). An investigation into the
relationship between gender and language, Sex Roles 24 (1), 122-134.
Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign
language education. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
Upton, T. & M. Cohen (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse
analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11 (5), 585-596.
Whitelaw, S., Milosevic, L., & Daniels, S. (2000). Gender, behaviour and
achievement: A preliminary study of pupil perceptions and attitudes.
Gender and Education, 12 (1), 87-113.
Willett, J. (1996). Research as a gendered practice. TESOL Quarterly, 30 (3),
344–347.
