Factors Affecting E-Learning Success at Universities

Subject Areas : Infomartion Technology

Mohamad  Eghbal ¹ (عضو هیأت علمی گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نکا، نکا، ایران)
akram  yaghobi ² (کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ساری، ساری، ایران)
leila  hosseitabaghdehi ³ (استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رامسر، رامسر، ایران)

Received: 2014-11-10 Accepted : 2016-02-01 Published : 2015-11-01

Keywords: e-learning, cultural factors, organizational politics, network and support,

Abstract :

The present study aimed to investigate the factors affecting success in e-learning from students' point of view. The research method based on purpose was applied and based on data collection was survey. The statistical population included all students of one of the branches of Mazandaran province Universities, in the academic year 2013. According to the Krejcie and Morgan table 366 people were selected as statistical sample by using random sampling method. For data collection, a researcher made questionnaire was used. Face and content validity of the questionnaire were verified. Its reliability, assessed through a pilot study in a sample of 30 people and Cronbach's alpha, was estimated 0.84. In order to analyze the data, exploratory factor analysis and one sample t-test were used. Exploratory factor analysis showed that three factors including network and support, culture and organizational policies were effective on e-learning success. Also, the results of t-test showed that the variables of culture, organizational policy and network and support in the university branch of the study were less than average

References:

1. Abdullahi, M., Zamani, B. B., Ebrahimzadeh, E., Zare, H., & Zandi, B. (2010). Lecturer factors inhibiting participation in E-learning Courses. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 56, 19-40. (in Persian).


2. Aminpour, F. (2007). E-learning in universities and higher education institutions. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 69, 217-228. (in Persian).


3. Attaran, M., Larkyan, M., Fazeli, N., & Aliasgary, M. (2011). Identification of e-learning curriculum: A case study in Iran. Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 3, 7-41. (in Persian).


4. Bakhtiari, L., Ghadampour, E., Bakhtiari, M., & Sadin, A. A. (2014). Comparison of information literacy and social skills of students in distance education and traditional education. Communication and Information Technology in Educational Sciences, 4(3(15)), 49-69. (in Persian).


5. Darab, B., & Montazer, G. H. (2010). Assess the readiness of e-learning in Iranian universities. Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 181-190. (in Persian).


6. Kamalian, A. R., & Fazell, A. (2009). The examination of prerequisites and evaluation of facilities of electronic learning system. Journal of Technology Education, 4(1), 13-27. (in Persian).


7. Khan, B. H. (2000). A framework for web-based learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. )in Persian).


8. Khan, B. H. (2005). Learning features in an open, flexible and distributed environmrnt. AACE Journal, 13(2), 137-153. (in Persian).


9. Khorasani, A., & Dosti, H. (2011). Evaluation of factors affecting the effectiveness of E-learning and satisfaction of Personnel (Case Study: Bank Saman). Communication and Information Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(4), 37-58. (in Persian).


10. Kian, M., Attaran, M., & Fazeli, N. (2011). Exploring the culture of e-learning in Iranian universities: A grounded theory research. Cultural Studies & Communication, 7(24), 95-127. (in Persian).


11. Mansoorfar, K. F. (2008). Advanced statistical methods (Second edition). Tehran: Tehran University Publishing and Printing Institute. (in Persian).


12. Matthew, M., & Gillis, B. (2003). Making sense of the relationship between information communication technologies and economic development. Washington State University/Center to Bridge the Digital Divide.


13. Naghavi, M. A. (2007). Study of the attitudes of faculties and students to
    E-learning: A survey of e-learning in teach the system approach. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 43, 157-176. (in Persian).


14. Rastegarpour, H., & Gorjizadeh, S. (2012). evaluation of the effectiveness of e-Learning courses in Tarbiat Modares University from the users' perspectives. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2(3(7)),
    5-30. (in Persian).


15. Rezaei Rad, M. (2012). Identify the success factors in the implementation of e-learning in higher education. Research in Curriculum, 33, 106-115. (in Persian).


16. Rezaei, M., Movahed Mohamadi, H., Asadi, A., & Kalantari, K. H. (2011). Identify policies for the development of e-learning in higher agricultural education. Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 2-42(1), 57-66. (in Persian).


17. Shahidi, F., & Zarif Sanaei, N. (2013). Interaction in e-learning. Media, 4(3), 48-55. (in Persian).


18. Weber H. (2003). Justification and methods of university education: A European perspective. Educational Management, 3(12), 22-33.


19. Yaghoubi, J., Malek Mohammadi, A., Iravani, H., & Attaran, M. (2008). Desirable characteristics of students and faculty members of the e-learning in higher education. tudents view a virtual periods. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 47, 159-173. (in Persian).


20. Zarif Sanaei, N. (2010). Evaluation criteria for the quality and effectiveness of
    e-learning higher education. Media, 3. 23-32. (in Persian).


21. Zolfaghari, M., Sarmadi, R., Negarndeh, R., Zandi, B., & Ahmadi, F. (2009). Attitude of the faculty of nursing and midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Teaching through a combination of e-learning system. Journal of Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Hayat), 15(1), 31-39. (in Persian).