Comparing the New and Old Fabrics of Isfahan City Regarding Ecological Criteria

Subject Areas : Space Ontology International Journal

Esmaeil Shieh ¹ , Marzie Ghassemi ²

1 - Professor of urban planning, Faculty of Architecture, University of Science and Technology,Tehran.Iran
2 - M.S. Student, Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

Received: 2014-02-08 Accepted : 2015-05-19 Published : 2016-01-01

Keywords: Urban contemporary fabrics, Old urban fabrics, Physical indexes, Space ecological city,

Abstract :

The emergence of new neighborhoodsin historical cities like Isfahan has been due to rapid population growth regardless of the context circumstances and in an attempt to meet the need for housing. On the other hand, old neighborhoods could not often form suitable environments for life because of incapability to meet the needs and wishes of the residents.Contrary to this situation, new ideas and theories are emerging in the urban world in which the main objective is improving the quality of urban environments. One of the basic concerns of modern urban planning in the world is returning to the nature and reducing the problems caused by automation and endless attack to the natural environment of human life. Hence in this study, we tried to further study and analyze one of the outlined characteristics of these ideas known as "Ecological city"and identify and separate the physical characteristics of an ecological city and also compare the physical criteria of new and old districts of the city in terms of closeness to these criteria. The main objectives of this study can be summarized as: 1. recognizingthe physical criteria of the ecologicalcity 2.studying the status of ancient and contemporary urban fabrics in compliance with these criteria. To investigate, twostudy sampleswere selected from Isfahan neighborhoods; one from traditional districts (Charkhab) and the other from contemporary districts (Mardavij). Then, these two areas were analyzed based on physical characteristics using Analytical Hierarchy Process and the results of this analysis were shown by GIS. The results of this analysis indicated superiority of the traditional fabrics to the contemporary one. This represents the human-oriented and sustainable urbanism of the country's pastwhich is neglected and forgotten today.The necessity of analysis of the past urbanism and contemporizing its criteria and indicators concerned with what is known today as the modern urbanism science can be considered as the most important result of this study.

References:

1. Zebardast , Esfandiar(2001) Analytical Hierarchy Process Application in Urban and Regional Planning, Journal of Faculty of Fine Arts, Tehran University, No. 10.(In persian Language)


2. Cheng, D. Y and S Wang.S (2006): GIS-based evaluation of multifarious local renewable energy sources: a case study of the Chigu area of southwestern Taiwan, Energy Policy 34., 730–742.


3. Cimren, E, B and Cathay. E, Budak ( 2007): Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 35, , 363–376.


4. Dye, P.K, Ramcharan, . E.K ( 2000):Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados, Journal of Environmental Management


5. Fry,G et al (2009): The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators, ecological indicators  933–947


6. FOOK, L and GANG,C (2010) : Towards a Liveable and Sustainable Urban Environment:Eco-Cities in East Asia, Singapore,World Scientific Publishing, 222


7. 
   

   Gerber,J (2010): International Economics, Content Technologies, Inc, 167-175 

   
   


8. KANG, P and  XU , Linyu (2010): The urban ecological regulation based on cological carrying capacity , International Society for Environmental Information Sciences 2010 Annual Conference (ISEIS), 1692–1700


9. Kenworthy, J (2011): The eco-city: ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development,


10.  Register  , R (1987 ): Ecocity Berkeley: Building Cities for a Healthy Future, North Atlantic Books, 1_10


11. Song , Y (2011,): Ecological city and urban sustainable development , International Conference on Green Buildings and Sustainable Cities, 42 – 146


12. Suzuki, H, et al (2010) : Eco2 Cities: Ecological Cities as Economic Cities, Washington D.C.: World Bank


13. UN-Habitat orld's cities report 2006/2007. London: Earthscan


14. Zhou, N and Williams (2013): An International Review of Eco-City Theory, Indicators, and Case Studies, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory


15. IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability,(2012): http://www.ifc.org


16. Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City (2009):A Case Study of an Emerging Eco-City in China: http://www-wds.worldbank.org