Scaffolding in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) vs. Scaffolding in Face-to-face Programs in IELTS Writing Task: Test-takers’ Perceptions in Focus
Subject Areas :Rezvan Narimani 1 , Fariba Rahimi Esfahani 2 , Sajad Shafiee 3
1 - Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 - Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
3 - Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
Keywords: IELTS, perceptions, scaffolding, L2 writing, MOOC,
Abstract :
AbstractThis research sought to investigate IELTS test-takers' perceptions of obtaining scaffolded MOOC-based training. To accomplish this purpose, 50 IELTS candidates were chosen through convenient sampling and assigned to one of two groups: a MOOC-based teaching group (MG, n = 25) and a face-to-face instruction group (F2FG, n = 25). The MG test-takers were exposed to FutureLearn, while the F2FG test-takers were given identical materials in person. Scaffolding took the form of visual aids, pre-teaching the necessary terminology, drawing on the participants' past knowledge of a subject, modeling what they were requested to write, and providing them with the sentence patterns needed to complete the IELTS Writing Task 2. The writing pre-test and post-test scores of the two groups were examined using a one-way ANCOVA, which revealed that the MG learners outperformed their F2FG counterparts significantly. The perception questionnaire results revealed that MG students liked MOOC-based education for their writing courses. The implications and applications of the current study's results are provided at the end of the research
References
Abbaspour, A., Atai, M. R., & Maftoon, P. (2020). The effect of a scaffolding-supported digital storytelling project on EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 15(31), 1-23.
Adams, R., & Clark, E. (2023). Ethical considerations in AI-driven education: Ensuring data privacy and responsible use. International Journal of Ethical Practices in Education, 8(2), 145-162.
Alwahibee, F. (2019). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy in EFL speaking classes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 907-920.
Brown, H., Johnson, L., Smith, M., & Davis, J. (2023). Empowering language learners with AI-driven chatbots: A case study in Spanish language MOOC. International Journal of Technology-Enhanced Language Learning, 5(2), 34-48.
Djiwandono, P. I. (2019). Exploring teacher intervention in EFL learners’ online interactions: A case of MOOC. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 587-601.
Garcia, P., Lee, S., Miller, E., & Brown, K. (2023). Exploring the potential of virtual and augmented reality in language learning MOOCs. Journal of Virtual and Augmented Language Learning, 7(1), 120-135.
Harris, M., Lee, S., Garcia, P., & Johnson, L. (2023). Collaborative efforts in MOOC-based language learning: A case study of cross-institutional partnership. International Journal of Language Learning Collaboration, 14(3), 289-305.
Imani, E., & Farahian, M. (2016). Effect of teacher-provided vs. student-created visual scaffolding on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 5(1), 33-42.
Jones, T., Smith, A., Harris, M., & Johnson, L. (2023). AI in education: Balancing innovation with ethical considerations. Educational Technology Review, 10(3), 321-338.
Kargar, A. A. (2013). The impact of scaffolded instruction on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 59-69.
Li, Y., Wang, R., Zheng, W., & Chen, W. (2022). The construction of an adaptive language learning system based on GPT-3. In International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Continuing Education (pp. 472-483). Springer, Cham.
McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. White Paper. Retrieved from http:// www. elearnspace. org/ Articles /MOOC _Final.pdf
Miller, E., & Brown, K. (2023). Transforming language education in the digital age: MOOCs and beyond. International Journal of Language Education and Technology, 9(1), 78-92.
Nasr, A. R., Bagheri, M. S., & Sadighi, F. (2020). The effect of scaffolding on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' reading comprehension through assessment for learning approach. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(1), 71-86.
Navío-Marco, J., & Solórzano-García, M. (2019). Integrating language learning tasks with digital and non-digital activities in a Spanish MOOC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 562-590.
Talebinejad, M. R., & Akhgar, M. (2015). The impact of scaffolding on Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(1), 465-475.
Thomas, M. (2022). Mobile language learning: Current trends and future perspectives. In Mobile Technology and Languages (pp. 71-89). Springer, Singapore.
Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Li, M., & Zheng, L. (2023). Breaking language barriers: Expanding MOOC-based language courses to cater to diverse learners. Journal of Multilingual and Intercultural Development, 11(4), 511-527.
White, L., & Davis, M. (2022). Mobile language learning in the wild: Informal practices and learner autonomy. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 42-59.