The effect of discourse markers on intermediate learners’ listening comprehension
الموضوعات : Journal of Teaching English Language StudiesNeda Javadi 1 , Ramin Rahmany 2
1 - Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch
2 - Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch
الکلمات المفتاحية: Discourse, Listening comprehension, language proficiency, Discourse markers, high and low proficiency,
ملخص المقالة :
This research was designed to investigate the effects of discourse markers on EFL Iranian learners' listening comprehension. Fifty eight male and female students took a pre-test as a proficiency test first, 39 students out of 58 are needed. To gain this aim, a language proficiency test, i.e., Nelson test will be given to the total participants. After calculating Mean and Standard Deviation, each person with +1SD above the mean will be assigned to high level of language proficiency and each one with -1SD below the mean will be assigned to low level of language proficiency. Then they were assigned to two experimental groups and a control group, twenty students for high level proficiency of DMs group, nineteen students for low level proficiency of DMs group and nineteen students for control group were selected. During four sessions of the treatment, each experimental group worked on four listening passages taken from IELTS sample. The participants in two experimental groups were encouraged to think and notice meaningfully to the DMs and their functions how concepts are linked in listening passages by DMs. Along with the experimental groups, the participants in the control group also worked on the different four listening passages. At the end, three post tests were performed in one session. Finally One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the results of the control and the two experimental groups’ post- tests, and a significant difference was observed in the high proficiency experimental group of DMs and control groups, but there was not observed any remarkable difference between the low proficiency group and control group
Abdi, R. (2010). Metadiscourse strategies in research articles: A study of the differences across subsections. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(1), 1-16. Aijmer, K. (2007). Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3(1), 173-190.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Benson, Malcolm J. (1989) "The Academic Listening Task: A Case Study",
TESOL Quarterly Vol. 23 No 3
Bloom, C.P. (1988). The roles of schemata in memory for text. Discourse Processes, 11, 305-318.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. New York: Cambridge.
Carter, R. A., & McCarthy, M. J. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language.
Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 141-158.
Carter, R. A., & McCarthy, M. J. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English:
A comprehensive guide: Spoken and written English grammar and usage.
Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Discourse analysis and the teaching of listening. In G. Chaudron, C. & Richards, J. (1986). The effect of discourse markers on the Comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7,113-127.
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking to readers: discourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
Crismore, A., & Abdollehzadeh, E. (2010). A review of recent discourse studies: The Iranian context. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9, 2, 195-219. Field, J. (2011). Into the mind of the academic listener. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 102-112.
Flower dew, J., & Tauroza, S. (1995). The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension. SSLA, 17, 435-458.
Haig, E. (2008). A critical discourse analysis of discourse strategies in reports on youth crime. UK Radio News, 4, 33-65.
Hyland, K. (2009). Corpus informed discourse analysis: The case of academic engagement.
Cambridge press.
Jung, E.H. (2003). The effects of organization markers on ESL learners' text understanding. TESOL Quarterly, 37 (4), 749-759.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.
Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Li, F. (2010). A study of English listening strategies used by senior middle school students. Asian Social Science, 6(10), 184-192.
Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 79-88.
Nation, I.S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking.
New York: Routledge.
Perez, M. A. & Macia, I. A. (2002). Metadiscourse in lecture comprehension:
Does it really help foreign language learners? Allantis, 14(2), 3-21. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and Applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Rubin, J. (1995). A review of second language listening comprehension research.
The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.
Schiffrin, D. (2009). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841
Syam, C. A. (2013). Spoken grammar isn’t broken grammar: A case for teaching spoken grammar ESL/EFL contexts. Language in India, 13(11), 146-157. Vande Kopple, W. (1989). Some exploratory on discourse. College composition and communication, 36, 1, 82-93.
Modern Language Review. Vol. 58, 4; 555 − 558.
Widdowson , Ed. (2007). Explorations in applied linguistics (pp. 57-61). ... ELT Journal, 60 (1), 3-12. 2-Halleck, G. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
Zarei, & Mahmudi. (2012). Schema building activities in L2 reading and listening comprehension: A theoretical review and an empirical analysis Singapore: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
