On the Efficacy of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Workshops: Academic Behavior and Perceptions in Focus

الموضوعات : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Rana Najjari ¹ ( Department of English Language Teaching, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran )
Gholam-Reza Abbasian ² ( Department of English Language Teaching, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran )
Massood Yazdanimoghaddam ³ ( Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University, Garmesar, Iran )

تاريخ الإرسال : 01 السبت , محرم, 1444 تاريخ التأكيد : 05 السبت , ربيع الأول, 1444 تاريخ الإصدار : 05 الخميس , صفر, 1444

الکلمات المفتاحية: Teachers' Perceptions, Learners' Perceptions, TPACK, TPACK Workshop, Academic Behavior Changes,

ملخص المقالة :

This research examined EFL teachers' and their learners' perceptions regarding teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) proficiency after implementing TPACK workshops in the Iranian context. TPACK workshops were administered by 15 EFL teachers and 45 EFL learners by applying the TPACK model (Koehler & Mishra, 2006) and learning by doing (Hegelheimer & Chapelle, 2004). The data analyses showed statistically significant differences between the participants' perceptions regarding TPACK intervention in pre and post-workshop stages and positive augmentations of TPACK workshops on academic behavior of EFL teachers. Therefore, the study provides a novel viewpoint regarding the importance of the participants' perceptions in blending technology into English teaching practice and suggests the actual beliefs and perceptions of Iranian EFL teachers and learners towards incorporating technology into English language teaching and Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) and teachers' academic behavior changes after implementation of online TPACK workshops as a professional development program.

المصادر:

Ansyari, M. (2012). The development and evaluation of a professional development arrangement for technology integration to enhance the communicative approach in English language teaching [Masters thesis]. Faculty of Behavioural Science, University of Twente.

Aryadoust, V., Mehran, P., & Alizadeh, M. (2016). Validating a computer-assisted language learning attitude instrument used in Iranian EFL context: An evidence-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 561–595. https://doi. org/10.1080/09588221.2014.1000931.

Atkins, N. E., & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 279-302.

Aydin, S. (2013). Teachers' perceptions about using computers in EFL teaching and learning: The case of Turkey. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26, 214-233.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol.2, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.

Baser, D. & Kopcha, T, & Ozden, M. (2015). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for pre-service teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 1-16. 10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456. Lam, 2000;

Bilici, S. C., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2).

Boehm, R. G., Brysch, C. P., Mohan, A., & Backler, A. (2012). A new pathway: Video-based professional development in geography. Journal of Geography, 111(2), 41-53.

Bostancıoğlu, A. & Handley, Z. (2018). Developing and validating a questionnaire for evaluating the EFL' Total PACKage': Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for English as a Foreign Language (EFL), Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31:5-6, 572-598, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1422524

Bradshaw, L. (2002). Technology for teaching and learning: strategies for staff development and follow-up support. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,10.

Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: a theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.

Chai, C., Koh, J., & Tsai, C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 31-51.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.C. & Tan, L.L.W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. 

Chuang, H. H., Ho, C. J., Weng, C. Y., & Liu, H. C. (2018). High school students' perceptions of English teachers' knowledge in technology-supported class environments. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(3), 197-206.

Dede, C., Jass Ketelhut, D., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8-19.

Doering, A., Koseoglu, S., Scharber, C., Henrickson, J. & Lanegran, D. (2014). Technology integration in K-12 geography education using TPACK as a conceptual model. Journal of Geography, 113(6), 223-237.

Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: how knowledge, confidence, beliefs and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255-284.

Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.

Guichon, N. & Hauck, M. (2011). Teacher education research in CALL and CMC: More in demand than ever. ReCALL, 23, 187 - 199. 10.1017/S0958344011000139

Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4): 311–26.  

Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research design in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224

Hegelheimer, V. (2006). When the technology course is required. In P. Hubbard & M.Levy (Ed.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 117-133). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research and Development, 55, 223-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5

Hong, K. (2010). CALL teacher education as an impetus for L2 teachers to integrate technology. ReCALL, 22, 53 - 69.

Hoven, D. (2006). Designing for disruption: Remodelling a blended course in technology in (language) teacher education.

Hoven, D. (2007). The affordances of technology for student teachers to shape their teacher education experience. In M. A. Kassen, R. Z. Lavine, K. Murphy-Judy & M. Peters (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers (pp. 133-163). CALICO.

Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers' resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 22(3), 357-372.

Hu, C., & Fyfe, V. (2010). Impact of a new curriculum on pre-service teachers' Technical, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK). Curriculum, Technology & Transformation for an Unknown Future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010.

Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. Calico Journal, 25(2), 175-188.

Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.

Hsu, P. (2012). Examining the impact of educational technology courses on pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge development. Teaching Education, 23(2), 195-213.

Inan, F., & Lowther, D. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). ISTE national educational technology standards for teachers. http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers/nets-for-teachers-2008.asp

Jang, S. J. & Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564. 

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing pre-service teachers' intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506

Keller, J. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.

Kessler, Greg. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 173-188. 10.1080/09588220701331394

Kessler, G. & Plakans, L. (2008). Does teachers' confidence with CALL equal innovative and integrated use? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 269-282. 10.1080/09588220802090303

Kilickaya, F. & Serefoglu, G. (2013). The impact of CALL instruction on English language teachers' use of technology in language teaching. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition – JSMULA, 1,20-38.

Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Routledge.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53, 48–53.

Knapp, W.M. (2017). The impact of TPACK and teacher technology efficacy on social studies teachers' use of technology in the classroom [Doctoral dissertation].

Lavelle, E. & Liu, Y., Theodore, P.,(2004). A preliminary study of the impact of online instruction on teachers' technology concerns. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 1-3.

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of educational research, 77(4), 575-614.

Mai, M. Y. & Hamzah, M. (2016). Primary science teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 6(2), 167-179.

Martin, B. (2015). Successful implementation of TPACK in teacher preparation programs. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 4(1), 17-26.

Milbrath, Y. & Kinzie, M. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: Computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Ohlson, T., Wehry, S., Monroe-Ossi, H., McLemore, B., Maki, K. & Fountain, C. (2014). Assessing inservice teachers' perceptions of their TPACK development. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2598-2603). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J. L., Butner, J., & Heiner, C. (2011). Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: The importance of who, why, and how. Educational Technology Research & Development, 59(2), 199-212

Sarhandi, P. S., Khan, I. F., Buledi, M. H., & Asghar, J. (2016). Integration of technology with pedagogical perspectives: An evaluative study of in-house CALL professional development. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on CALL, 3, 23–35.

Schmidt, D. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (International Society for Technology in Education, 42(2), 123.

Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Baran, E., & Thompson, A. & Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. & Seob, S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): the development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 4, 123-149. 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.

Serrano-Puche, J. (2015). Emotions and digital technologies: Mapping the field of research in media studies.

Shapley, K., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2011). Effects of technology immersion on middle school students' learning opportunities and achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 299-315.

Shih, C. & Chuang, C. (2012). Individual differences, psychological contract breach, and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30. https://doi. 10.1007/s10490-012-9294-8

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Spears, S. A. (2012). Technology-enhanced learning: The effects of 1: 1 technology on student performance and motivation. The University of West Florida.

Sulaimani, A., Sarhandi, P., & Buledi, M. (2017). Impact of CALL in-house professional development training on teachers' pedagogy: An evaluative study. Cogent Education, 4(1), 135646. http:// doi. 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1355646

Tai, J. (2013). From TPACK-in-Action workshops to English classrooms: CALL competencies developed and adopted into classroom teaching [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa State].

Tanak, A. (2018). Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 30, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. kjss.2018.07.012

Todorova, A., & Osburg, T. (2010). Professional Development Program for Technology Integration: Facilitators and Barriers to Sustainable Implementation. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 1.http://doi. 10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2010.0009.

Tseng, J. J. (2014). Developing an instrument for assessing technological pedagogical content knowledge as EFL students perceive. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 302–315.

Van-Olphen, M. (2007). Perspectives of foreign language pre-service teachers on the use of a web-based instructional environment in a methods course. CALICO Journal, 25(1), 91-109. 

Williams, M. K., Foulger, T. S. & Wetzel, K. (2009). Preparing pre-service teachers for 21st-century classrooms: Transforming attitudes and behaviors about innovative technology. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 17(3), 393-418.

Yurdakul, I. K., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale--Deep (TPACK Scale, TPCK). Computers & Education, 58 (3), p. 964-977.

Zhao, Y. & Frank, K.A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. 

Zhao, Y., & Tella, S. (2002). Technology and teacher education (special issue). Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 2–5.