Effect of Student-Generated Vocabulary Factors on EFL Learners' Autonomy
الموضوعات : نشریه زبان و ترجمه
Kulsoum Ghasemi
1
,
Shahram Afraz
2
,
Fazlolah Samimi
3
1 - Department of English, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
2 - Department of English, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
3 -
الکلمات المفتاحية: autonomy, student-generated vocabulary, autonomous learner, testing,
ملخص المقالة :
The present study aimed at investigating student-generated vocabulary testing factors fostering autonomy among Iranian EFL learners. The changing needs of today's society have redefined the goals of education in general and teacher and learner roles in particular. Learners are no longer viewed as the individuals who passively receive knowledge from teachers. Instead, the modern society has necessitated a lifelong learning, that is, training learners by giving them the power to take the responsibility of their own learning. The qualitative method of research was used in this study. The participants consisted of 30 EFL learners studying or finished teaching English. A semi-structured interviews were designed and conducted. After conducting all the interviews, the recorded interviews were transcribed by the researcher. In order to maintain the confidentiality, each participant was given a name other than his or her real names. Then, the transcripts and interviews' notes and memos returned to the participants and they were asked to ensure that the data was genuine and truly based on their opinions. Then, the transcripts were read and reread several times in order to thoroughly comprehend and get familiar with. In this qualitative research, MAXQDA software was used to analyze the data. A large number of codes were consequently provided by the software and a list of tentative categories were prepared (4 themes and 14 categories) by the constant comparative method. The four themes are: 1- Personality characteristics 2- Positive points of student-generated vocabulary testing, 3- Negative points of student-generated vocabulary testing, 4- Teacher’s role.
Ahmed, H. N. & Shakir, W. S. The Effect of Teacher's Feedback on Students' Language Skills at University Level. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies. ISSN 2520-0968 (Online), ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), September 2019, Vol.6, No.1
Almusharraf, N. (2018). English as a foreign language learner autonomy in vocabulary development: Variation in student autonomy levels and teacher support. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.
Benson, P. (1996). Concept of autonomy in language learning. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li, W. W. F. Or, & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 27-34). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
Bilová, Š. (2018). Collaborative and individual vocabulary building using ICT. Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric, 53(1), 31-48.
Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Nemeth, K. (2022). Quizlet and podcasts: effects on vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1407-1436.
Candy, P. C. Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. San Francisco: JosseyBass, 1991.
Cannon, R., and Newble, D. (2000). A Guide to Improving Teaching Methods: A Handbook for Teachers in University and Colleges. London: Kogan Page.
Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: what do our learners tell us? Teaching in higher education, 6(4), 505- 518.
Chang, K.C. (2012), "Fostering learner autonomy through empowering students in EFL writing", English Teaching & Learning, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 39-84, doi: 10.6330/ETL.2012.36.3.02
Chen, W., Grangier, D., & Auli, M. (2015). Strategies for training large vocabulary neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.04906.
Chong, E. (2014). Teaching philosophy. Retrieved from http://instructional1.calstatela.edu/lkam-his/tesl565sp07/chong_sahyouni_yu/teachingphilosop hy-EC.htm
D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York, NY: Newbury House.
Dale E. Audiovisiual Methods in Teach-ing. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Win-ston; 1946.
Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: A literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174.
DulliCarpini. M. (2012). Building computer technology skills in TESOL teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 16(2), 14-23.
Freeman, D., Katz, A., Garcia Gomez, P., & Burns, A. (2015). English-for-teaching: Rethinking teacher proficiency in the classroom. ELT Journal, 69(2), 129-139.
Ghobain, E. (2020). Indirect Specialized Vocabulary Learning and Learner Autonomy. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 745-760.
Gray, A. (1997), "The road to knowledge is always under construction: a life history journey to constructivist teaching," unpublished master's thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan.
Gumartifa, A., & Saputri, K. (2020). The anxiety of language learning and language skills: Helpful ideas to the study of English as a foreign language. ELTICS: English Language Teaching and English Linguistics, 5, (2), 1-12
Herra, A., & Kulińska, A. (2019). The role of feedback in the process of learning English as a foreign language. In Forum Filologiczne ATENEUM.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
Holec, H. (1981), Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.1.22
Hu, X., Li, G., Xia, X., Lo, D., Lu, S., & Jin, Z. (2018). Summarizing source code with transferred api knowledge.
Indah, R. N., Rohmah, G. N., & Afifuddin, M. (2020). What I know Best: Assessing Indonesian student’s structural knowledge through student-generated topics. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 629-638.
Johnson, D. (2017). The Role of Teachers in Motivating Students To Learn. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, Volume 9, Issue 1
Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative lan-guage teaching. New York, NY: Cam-bridge University Press.
Maplethorpe, L., Kim, H., Hunte, M. R., Vincett, M., & Jang, E. E. (2022). Stu-dent-generated questions in literacy education and assessment. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(1), 74-97.
Maplethorpe, L., Kim, H., Hunte, M. R., Vincett, M., & Jang, E. E. (2022). Stu-dent-generated questions in literacy education and assessment. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(1), 74-97.
Mays, B. R., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2020). The effects of using audience response systems incorporating student-generated questions on EFL students’ reading comprehension. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 553-566.
Moore, D. M., D'Mello, A. M., McGrath, L. M., & Stoodley, C. J. (2017). The de-velopmental relationship between specific cognitive domains and grey matter in the cerebellum. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 24, 1-11.
Nan, C. W., Liu, G., Lin, Y., & Li, M. (2004). Interface effect on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Applied Physics Letters, 85(16), 3549-3551.
Nation, I. (2022). Vocabulary-learning strategies and autonomy. In Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (Cambridge Applied Linguistics, pp. 316-335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009093873.009
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Nunan, D. (1996). Towards autonomous learning: Some theoretical, empirical and practical issues. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li, W. W. F. Or, & H. D. Pierson(Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp.13-26). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong
Oteir, I. N., and Al-Otaibi, A. N. (2019). Foreign language anxiety: a systematic review. Arab World Engl. J. 10, 309–317. doi: 10.24093/awej/vol10 no3.21
Runco, M.A. and Jaeger, G.J. (2012), "The standard definition of creativity," Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 92-96, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 (ac-cessed 18 November 2019).
Seven, M. A. (2020). Motivation in language learning and teaching. African Educational Research Journal Special Issue 8(2), pp. S62-S71
Smith, D. A. (2017). Collaborative Peer Feedback. International Conference Educational Technologies, 183- 186.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative compe-tence: Some roles of comprehensible input and output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Tseng, W. T., Liou, H. J., & Chu, H. C. (2020). Vocabulary learning in virtual environments: Learner autonomy and collaboration. System, 88, 102190.
Tudor, I. (1993). Teacher roles in the learner-centered classroom. ELT Journal, 47(1), 23-24.
Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teach-ing: Practice of theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ushioda, E. (1996) Learner Autonomy 5: The Role of Motivation. Dublin: Authentik.
Villalobos, O.B, (2014). Content-Based Instruction: A Relevant Approach of Language Teaching. INNOVATIONES EDUCATIVAS, 15 (20). 71-83. Retrieved From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316258605_Content-Based_Instruction_A_Relevant_Approach_of_Language_Teaching
Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M. (2009). RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature reviews genetics, 10(1), 57-63.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Arnold.
Winnie, H. P., & Perry, E. N. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 532-566). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Xu, Z. (2014). Teaching and assessing EIL vocabulary in Hong Kong. In The pedagogy of English as an International Language (pp. 143-156). Springer, Cham.
Yawiloeng, R. (2020). Second language vo-cabulary learning from viewing video in an EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 13(7).
Yu, F. Y., & Shiu, J. Y. (2022, July). Effects of online student-generated questions based on different media formats on elementary school student English vocabulary learning. In 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 224-226). IEEE.
