Impact of Using the STAD Model of Cooperative Learning on Autonomy and Attitude of Iranian Secondary School EFL Learners
الموضوعات : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)
1 - دکترای آموزش زبان انگلیسی، وزارت آموزش و پرورش، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: Attitude, Autonomy, Cooperative learning, Iranian EFL learners, STAD,
ملخص المقالة :
This quasi-experimental study investigated the impact of cooperative learning on Iranian secondary school EFL learners’ Autonomy and attitude. To achieve the purpose of the study, 142 EFL students were selected based on their performance on the Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT). The students were divided into an experimental group receiving treatment through the STAD model of cooperative learning and a control group devoid of the stated treatment. To recognize the entry behaviors of the participants, pretests were run. The same educational content was taught to both EG and CG during an educational term. Furthermore, to disclose the effect of treatment, an autonomy posttest similar to the pretest but in rearranged order in options and items, and also an attitude posttest with the same characteristics were administered to the students in both groups at the end of the instruction. Moreover, the mean scores of autonomy and attitude questionnaires were compared via a one-way ANCOVA, and chi-square respectively. The outcomes showed the rejection of both null hypotheses consequently concluding that cooperative learning had a significant effect on the autonomy and attitude of Iranian EFL learners.
References
Ahmadi, R., & Mahdavi- Zafarghandi, A. (2013). Autonomous language
learning in Iranian context: To what extent do students take
responsibility for their learning? International Journal of Research
Studies in Language Learning, 2(5), p. 17-26.
Akhtar, K. et al. (2012). A Study of Student’s Attitudes towards
Cooperative Learning. International Journal of Humanities and
Social Science, 2 (11), pp. 141-147.
Allford, D., & Pachler, N. (2007). Language, autonomy and the new
learning environments. Bern: Peter Lang.
Amedu, O., & Gudi, K. (2017). Attitude of Students Towards Cooperative
Learning in Some Selected Secondary Schools in Nasarawa State.
Journal of Education and Practice. 8(10), pp. 29-34.
Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and language. Clevedon: Multilingual
Matters.
Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2014). Collaborative
learning techniques: A resource for college faculty, 2nd Edition.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language
Learning. London: Longman
Benson, P. (2004). Learner autonomy in the classroom. In D. Nunan (Ed.),
Practical English language teaching (pp. 290-308). Beijing: Higher
Education Press.
Nazari, A. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 5(2) (2023), 48-76
69
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.).
Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and independence in language
learning. London: Longman.
Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual
Review of Psychology 62, pp.391–417. doi:
10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609.
Broady, E., & Kenning, M. (1996). Promoting learner autonomy in
university language teaching. London: Middlesex University
Printing Services.
Crano, W. D., Cooper, J., & Forgas, J. P. (2010). Attitudes and Attitude
Change. An Introductory Review. In The Psychology of Attitudes
and Attitude Change, edited by Joseph P. Forgas, Joel Cooper, and
William D. Crano, 3–18. New York: Psychology Press.
Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner
autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 24, pp. 1-
23.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. London:
Longman.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). ‘The L2 motivational self-system’. In Motivation,
language identity and the L2 self, edited by Zoltan Dörnyei and Ema
Ushioda, pp. 9–42. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language
classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. New
York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (2007). The Advantages of an Inclusive
Definition of Attitude. Social Cognition 25 (5), pp. 582–602.
doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language
Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward
Arnold.
Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A. M. Tennant, J. & Mihic, L. (2004).
Integrative Motivation: Changes during a Year-Long Intermediate-
Nazari, A. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 5(2) (2023), 48-76
70
Level Language Course. Language Learning 54 (1), pp. 1–34.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00247. x.
Gillies, R. (2004). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Junior High
School Students during Small Group Learning. Learning and
Instruction, 14(2), pp. 197-213.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford:
Pergamon Press.
Jiménez, R. M., & Lamb, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy for autonomy in
modern languages education: Theory, practice, and teacher
education. Dublin: Authentik.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1994). An overview of cooperative
learning. Creativity and collaborative learning. Retrieved from
http://teachers.henrico.k12.va.us/staffdev/mcdonald_j/downloads/2
1st/co
Karali, Y, Aydemir, H. (2018). The effect of Cooperative Learning on the
Academic Achievement and Attitude of Students in Mathematics
Class. Educational Research and Reviews, 13 (21), pp. 712-722.
Koos, et al. (2010). The Effects of Cooperative Learning Experience on
Eighth Grade Students' Achievement and Attitude toward Science.
Education, Vol (131), Issue 1, pp. 169-180.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems.
Dublin: Authentik.
Mantle, B. C. (1995). Positive Attitudes and Realistic Beliefs: Links to
Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 79 (3), pp. 372–386.
doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4781. 1995.tb01114. x.
Myskow, G., Bennett, P. A., Yoshimura, H., Gruendel, K., Marutani, T.,
Hano, K., & Li, T. (2018). Fostering collaborative autonomy: The
roles of cooperative and collaborative learning. Relay Journal, 1 (2),
pp. 360-381.
Nematipour, M. (2012). A Study of Iranian EFL learners’ autonomy level
and its relationship with learning style. English Linguistics
Research, 1(1), p.126.
Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2013). Autonomous learning and critical
thinking: Inspecting the association among EFL learners. In First
National Conference on Teaching English, Literature, and
Nazari, A. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 5(2) (2023), 48-76
71
Translation, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Retrieved from
http://www. civilica. Com/Paper-TELT01-TELT01_226. Html.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple Roles for
Persuasion Variables.’ In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by
Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T.
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Tormala, Z. L. (2003). Persuasion and
Attitude Change. In Handbook of Psychology, Personality and
Social Psychology, edited by T. Millon and M. J. Lerner, Vol. 5, pp.
353-382. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Reda, T. (2015). Attitude of Students towards Cooperative Learning
Methods (the Case of Wolaita Sodo University Psychology
Department Second Year Students). International Journal of
Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, Volume 24, No 2, pp. 33-44
Sharp, D. B., Thomas, E., Price, F. G., & Davies, I. (1973). Attitudes to
Welsh and English in the Schools of Wales. Basingstole: Macmillan.
Shi, W., & Han, L. (2019). Promoting Learner Autonomy through
Cooperative Learning. English Language Teaching; Vol. 12, No. 8;
2019 ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750. doi: 10.5539/elt.
v12n8p30. URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n8p30.
Shu, D. F., & Zhuang, Z. X. (2008). Modern foreign language teaching:
Theories, practice and approaches. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign
Language Education Press.
Slavin, R. E., (1992). Cooperative Learning. In Gall, Joyce, P., Gall, M.D.,
Walter R (1999). Applying Educational Research: A Practical
Guide. (4th ed.). pp. 114-118. New York, NY: Longman.
Strobel, J., & Van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A
meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional
classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning,
3(1), pp. 44-58. doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1046
Van, W. M. (2012). The Effects of the STAD-Cooperative Learning
Method on Student Achievement, Attitude and Motivation in
Economics Education. Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), pp. 261-
270, DOI: 10.1080/09718923.2012.11893104.
Nazari, A. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 5(2) (2023), 48-76
72
Walmsley, A. L. (2003). Cooperative Learning and its Effects in a High
School Geometry Classroom. Mathematics Teacher, 96(2), pp. 112-
116.
Winston, V. (2010). Effects of Cooperative Learning on Achievement and
Attitude Among Students of Color. The Journal of Educational
Research, 95(6), pp. 359-364.
Wood, W. (2000). Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence.
Annual Review of Psychology 5 (1), pp. 539–570. doi:
10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539.
Yahong, L. (2009). How can I help my students promote learnerAutonomy in English language learning? Educational Journal of
Living Theories, 2(3), pp. 365-398.
A
