Implicit and Explicit Instruction of Reading Strategies and the Application of Metacognitive Strategies by Iranian EFL Freshmen Students

Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation

Marjan Mehrpour ¹ , Mostafa Zamanian ^{2 *} , Firooz Sadighi ³ , Ehsan Hadipourfard ⁴

1 - Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Shiraz branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
4 - Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

Received: 2022-02-01 Accepted : 2022-05-21 Published : 2023-11-01

Keywords: reading strategies, explicit instruction, Iranian EFL learners, Metacognitive strategies, implicit instruction,

Abstract :

This quantitative research explores the implicit and explicit instruction of reading strategies and its connection through the application of metacognitive strategies by Iranian EFL students. To this purpose, 100 Iranian university freshmen, aged 20-35, studying at the Marwdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, were selected as participants through a convenient sampling method, from a pool of 117 students. Then, the Key English Test (KET) was used to check their homogeneity. The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) was also used as a pre-test and post-test to specify the kind and occurrence sequence of learning strategies applied by the participants before and after the treatment. So, the participants were allotted to two experimental groups and received implicit and explicit instruction of reading strategies respectively. The results obtained from statistical data analysis showed that affective strategies were the very frequently-applied strategies, while memory strategies were the least frequently-applied strategies in the explicit group. It was also found that in the implicit group, cognitive strategies were the most frequently-applied strategies, while social strategies were the least frequently-applied strategies. These results have pedagogical implications for EFL teachers to use appropriate approaches in teaching reading strategies, that will ultimately help the students to develop more awareness and competence in reading comprehension.

References:

Alhaqbani, A., & Riazi, M. (2012). Metacog-nitive awareness of reading strategy use in Arabic as a second language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2).
Al-Khateeb, O. S. M. (2011). The impact of using metacognitive learning strategies on Al-Hussain Bin Talal university stu-dents‟ achievement in and attitudes to-wards health concepts in „Tenet of Worship‟ course. Asian Social Science, 7(3), 165–186.
Al Melhi, A. M. (2000). Analysis of Saudi college students' reported and actual reading strategies along with their meta-cognitive awareness as they read in English as a foreign language. Disserta-tion Abstracts International, 60 (7).
Anderson, N. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99-109). Cambridge, UK: Cam-bridge University Press.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacogni-tive Skills and Reading. In P. D. Pear-son, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 353 - 394). New York: Longman.
Chamot, A.U. (2001) The role of learning strategies in second language acquisi-tion. In M.P. Breen, Learner contribu-tions to language learning. Harlow, England: Longman. 25–43
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow: Longman.
Cohen, A., & Macaro, E. (2007). Learner strate-gies.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dornei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the lan-guage learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New Jer-sey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2008). Using self-regulated strategy development to support students who have “trubolgiting things into words”. Remedial and Special Education, 29(2), 78-89.
Hong-Nam, K. & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Lan-guage learning strategy use of ESL stu-dents in an intensive English learning context. System, 34, 399-415.
Jafari, S. M., & Shokrpour, N. (2012). The reading strategies used by Iranian ESP students to comprehend authentic ex-pository texts in English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics& English Literature, 1(4), 102-113.
Jaffrey, Madhumati & Ghosh (2012). The reading strategies used by Iranian ESP students to comprehend authentic ex-pository texts in English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & Eng-lish Literature, 1(4).
Kasaian, Z., & Ghadiri, M. (2011). An investi-gation of the relationship between moti-vation, and metacognitive awareness strategies in listening comprehension: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Jour-nal of Language Teaching and Re-search, 2(5), 1069-1079.
Madhumathi, P., & Ghosh, A. (2012). Aware-ness of reading strategy use of Indian ESL students and the relationship with reading comprehension achievement. English Language Teaching, 5(12).
O’Malley, J. et al. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
O’malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strate-gies and beyond: A look at strategies in the context of styles. In S. S. Magnan (Ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learner (35-55). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on Teaching of Foreign Languages.
Oxford, R. and Nyikos, M. (1989) Variables Affecting Choice of Language Learning Strategies by University Students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x.