نقش مؤلفه‌های سرمایۀ اجتماعی بر رضایت زناشویی دانشجویان متأهل
محورهای موضوعی : تربیتیآذر قلی زاده 1 , زهره اسماعیلیان اردستانی 2
1 - عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی اصفهان
2 - دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی دانشگاه اصفهان
کلید واژه: رضایت زناشویی, اعتماد, مهارت‌های ارتباطی, سرمایه اجتماعی, احترام, مسؤولیت‌پذیری, همکاری,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر مؤلفه‌های سرمایه اجتماعی (اعتماد، احترام، ارزش‌های اخلاقی، همکاری، مسؤولیت‌پذیری، احساس امنیت، مشارکت اجتماعی و مهارت‌های ارتباطی) بر رضایت زناشویی دانشجویان متأهل دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی اصفهان (خوراسگان) در سال 1390 بود. پژوهش مطالعه‌ای توصیفی- همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانشجویان متأهل به تعداد 1150نفر بود که از این تعداد نمونه‌ای 288 نفری با استفاده از فرمول حجم نمونه کرجسی و مورگان (1970) به‌صورت تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از دو پرسشنامه استاندارد رضایت زناشویی انریچ (1979) با 47 سؤال که پایایی عامل‌های آن توسط السون و السون (1999) در دامنه‌ای بین 48/0 تا 90/0 و مهدویان (1376) بین 50/0 تا 87/0 برآورد گردیده است؛ و پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته سرمایه اجتماعی با 51 سؤال و ضریب آلفای 75/0 استفاده شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از تحلیل رگرسیون استفاده گردید. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که مؤلفه‌های مختلف سرمایه اجتماعی شامل اعتماد متقابل زوجین، احترام متقابل، تعاون، ارزش‌های اخلاقی، مسؤولیت‌پذیری، احساس امنیت، مشارکت اجتماعی و مهارت‌های ارتباطی بر رضایت زناشویی تأثیر معنی داری دارند (0001/0 ( P≤ .
The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of the social capital components (trust, respect, ethical values, cooperation, responsibility, sense of security, social participation and communicative skills) on marital satisfaction of married students in Islamic Azad University of Isfahan Khorasgan Branch. The research was descriptive correlation study. The statistical population consisted of all 1150 married students, out of whom a sample 288 persons were randomly selected according to Kerjesi & Morgan formula. For collecting the data, two questionnaires were administered, Enrich Standardized Questionnaire of Marital Satisfaction (1979) with 47 items and reliability between 0.48 – 0.90 according to Olson and Olson (1999) and between 0.50- 0.87 according to Mahdaviyan (1376) and a researcher- made Questionnaire of Social Capital consisted of 51 items with the reliability of 0 . 75. To analyze the data, regression analysis was applied. The research findings showed that different social capital dimensions including mutual trust, respect ,cooperation, ethical values, responsibility, sense of security, social participation and communicative skills have significant effect on marital satisfaction (P≤0.0001).
Atherldy, K.M. (2010). Sport, localism and social capital in Rural in Rural estern Australia Journal of Sociology, 44(4), 348-360.
Baucom, D.H; Hahlweg, K; Atkina, D.C; Engel, J. (2006). Long Term prediction of marital uality following a relationship educationship program:Being positive in a countructive way. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3) 448-455.
Bodenmann, G; Shantinath, S.D. (2004). The couples coping enhancement training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress basede upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53,5,477-485.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Reproduction in Education, Socity and Calture, London.
Boyas, J., & Wind, L.H. (2010). Employment-based social capital, job stress, and employee burnout: A public child welfare employee structural model. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(3), 380-388.
Coleman, S. (1998). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. erican Journal of Sociology v.94. supplement. s95-s120.
Graham, J. (2007). A review of some important MMPI special, INP. Advance in psychological assessment.
Gregory, E. (2002). Accountability, responsibility and corruotion: Managing the Public Production Process. Injonathan Boston. Ed, The state Under contract Wellington, New Zealan. Bridget Williams books.
Hunler, O.S; Gencoz, T. (2005). The effect of religiousness on marital satisfaction: testing the mediator role marital problem solving between religiousness and marital satisfaction relationship. Contemporary Family Therapy, 27, 1, 123-136.
Krejcie, V., Morgan, W. (1970) .Determining Sample Size for Research Activities ,Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Madathil, J; Benshoff, J. (2008). Importance of Marital Characteristicsa and Marital Satisfaction: A Comparison of Asian Indians in Arranged Marriages and Americans in Marriages of Choice. The Family Journal, 15(3), 112-125.
Mc Carthy, B. (1999). Marital style and its effects on sexual desire and functionaing. Journal of family Psychotherapy, 10.1-12.
Meyers, S.A; Landsberger, S.A. (2002). Direct and indirect pathways between adult attachment style and marital satisfaction. Personal relationship, 9, 159-172.
Miller, Pj; Caughlin, Jp; Huson, TL. (2003). Trait expressiveness and marital satisfaction: the role of idealization processes. Journal of Mariiage and Family. 65, 4, 978-995.
Olson, D.H; Olson, A. (1999). Preventive approaches in couple therapy. New Youk: talor, Francis pub.
Park, H. (2006). The Role of trust on knowledge creation in a virtual organization: A social capital perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 7,.4.
Petty, B.D. (2008). Marriage education: A groundea theory study of the positive influence of the educational experience on the marriage relationship. University of Idaho.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Rosen- Grandon, J.R; Myhers, J.E; Hattie, J.A. (2004). The relationship between marital characteristics, marital interaction processes and marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling & Development, 2(1), 58-68.
Snelgrove, J; Pikhart, H. (2009). A multilevel analysis of social capital and self- rated heath: evidence from the British household panel survey. Journal of health Politics, Policy and Law, 689-694.
Taniguchi, S.T; Freeman, P.A; Taylor, S; Malcarne, B. (2006). A study of married couples perceptions of marital satisfaction in outdoor recreation. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(3), 253-359.
Totterman, A; Wulff, G. (2007). What a social capital perspective can bring to the understanding of information sharing in a university context, if information research Vol. 12. No.4.
Widemann, K; Hennigs, D. (2006). Corporate Social capital and corporate / nyco6 /widemann hennings. Pdf. inch, R. (2000). Selected studies in marriage and the familiy. New York. Hito Rinehart and Wiston. INC.
Zinbarg, R. (2007). Marriage certificate data compilation file, 131- 133.