Translation and Ideology: When Faithfulness Becomes a Luxury in Translation

Subject Areas :

Reza Jelveh ¹ , Abbass Eslami Rasekh ² , Akbar Taghipour ³

1 - MA, Department of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan
2 - Assistant Professor, University of Isfahan, Isfahan
3 - MA, Department of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan

Received: 2011-08-12 Accepted : 2012-02-07 Published : 2013-06-01

Keywords: culture, Politics, Ideology, translation, manipulation,

Abstract :

Every discourse, written or oral, is the conveyer of some hidden agenda of the producer, most importantly in such genres of speech as journalism, politics, propaganda, and advertisements. Given the role of translation in discourse, a difference exists between when the translator carries the ideological values of the elite in contrast with one with patriotic preferences. In this study a comparison was made between translation products resulting from the work of 15 postgraduates of translation studies viewed as freelancers and another published product carrying the elite’s ideology whose works appeared in published in the state media. The results of our comparisons, both qualitative and quantitative showed that there existed two types of difference: the ideology of the elite on the one hand, and the preferred culture related valuesof the freelancers on the other. The differences revealed that both groups translated under the influence of some pre-disposed influence dividable into different categories. Employing strategies of manipulation would be considered as an identity marker showing the social identity of the translator. The effect could be either their cultural preferences or, in contrast, the elite’s favorable set of preferences imposed on both the translator and the product of translation.

References:

References

Al-Shehari, K. (2007).Semiotics and the Translation of News Headlines: Making an Image of the Other, Translation Studies in the New Millennium: An International Journal of Translation and Interpretation, 5 (1), 1-16.

Bassnett, S. &Trivedi, H. (1999). Introduction. In S. Bassnett and H. Trivedi (Eds.), Postcolonial Translation: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In Lawrence Venuti (Ed.) (2004), The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge: 138-145.

Jelveh, R. (2011).An ideological outlook towards the role of translation in cultural equations: introducing universal and patriotic translation [Persian].Nasim-Jangal, 1 (6), p.9

Lefevere, A. (1992).Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London and NewYork: Routledge.

Montgomery, M (2006). Semantic asymmetry and the war on terror. In Kyle Conway & Susan Bassnett (Eds), Translation in Global News (Proceedings of the conference held at the University of Warwick on 23 June 2006), Warwick: the University of Warwick: 23-28.

Munday, J. (2001).Introducing Translation Studies: Theoriesand applications. USA andCanada:  Routledge.

Simon, S. (1996).Gender in Translation: Cultural Identity and the Politics of Transmission. London andNew York: Routledge.

Spivak, G. (2000).The politics of translation.In L. Vennuti (Eds), The Translation StudiesReader(pp. 397-416).London and New York: Routledge.

Valdeón, R. A. (2007), Translating news from the inner circle: Improving regularity across languages.Quaderns: Revista de Traducció,14, 155-16.

Venuti, L. (ed.) (1992).Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology. London and New York: Routledge.

Venuti, L. (1995).The Translator`s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London and New York: Routledge.