تأثیر محرک‌های بالقوه ریسک دادخواهی ناشی از اشتباه‌ها و تحریف‌ها در گزارشگری مالی صاحبکاران بر تعدیل اظهارنظر حسابرسی
محورهای موضوعی : حسابداری و مالی
1 - گروه حسابداری وحسابرسی،دانشکده مدیریت،واحدتهران شمال،دانشگاه آزاداسلامی،تهران ،ایران
کلید واژه: ریسک بالقوه دادخواهی, اشتباه‌ها و تحریف‌ها در گزارشگری مالی, واژه‌های کلیدی: اظهارنظر تعدیل شده حسابرسی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیدهدر مقاله حاضر با توجه به اهمیت محرک‌های بالقوه ریسک دادخواهی در حوزه حسابرسی مبتنی بر ریسک، تأثیر تعدیلات حسابرسی سنواتی و مدیریت سود ناشی از اشتباه‌ها و تحریف‌ها در گزارشگری مالی صاحبکاران بر اظهارنظر تعدیل شده حسابرسی بررسی گردیده است. در راستای انجام تحلیل‌های آماری، جامعه متشکل از 131 شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی سال‌های 1391 تا 1398 طبق شرایطی غربال شده است. فرضیه‌های پژوهش با بکارگیری مدل‌های رگرسیون لوجیت باینری چند متغیره طبق مشاهده‌های شرکت-سال آزمون شده‌اند. یافته‌ها نشان داده‌اند به موازات افزایش مدیریت سود ناشی از تحریف در گزارشگری مالی شرکت‌ها، احتمال ارائه اظهارنظر تعدیل شده حسابرسی افزایش یافته است. همچنین، به‌موازات افزایش تعدیلات سنواتی ناشی از اشتباه‌ها در گزارشگری مالی شرکت‌ها، احتمال ارائه اظهارنظر تعدیل شده حسابرسی افزایش یافته است. به علاوه، شواهد بیانگر آن است که سطوح بالاتر اقلام تعهدی غیرعادی و فعالیت‌های واقعی غیرعادی در شرکت‌ها سبب تقویت رابطه مثبت بین تعدیلات سنواتی و ارائه اظهارنظر تعدیل شده حسابرسی شده است. در واقع، تعدیلات سنواتی و مدیریت سود به عنوان پیامدهای وجود اشتباه‌ها و تحریف‌ها در گزارشگری مالی صاحبکاران، حسابرسان را در معرض تهدید ریسک دادخواهی قرار می‌دهد که در مقوله حسابرسی مبتنی بر ریسک انتظار می‌رود منجر به تلاش بیشتر حسابرسان و انجام حسابرسی با کیفیت شود. در چنین شرایطی حسابرسان به منظور کاهش بالقوه ریسک دادخواهی، محافظه‌کارانه عمل کرده و از طریق ارائه اظهارنظر تعدیل شده حسابرسی نسبت به این موضوع واکنش نشان می‌دهند.The Impact of Potential Litigation Risk Motives arising from Material Errors & Misstatement in Clients’ Financial Reporting on Modified Audit OpinionAbstractConsidering the importance of potential litigation risk motives in the risk-based audit process, this paper assessed the impact of annual audit adjustments and earnings management due to material errors & misstatement in clients' financial reporting on the modified audit opinion. Research population includes 131 listed firms in Tehran Securities & Exchange over the period March 2012 till March 2020. Research Hypotheses analyzed using multivariate binary logit regression models based on firm-year observations. Findings showed that more earnings management due to misstatement in clients’ financial reporting lead to increase the likelihood of issuance the modified opinion by auditors. Also, as the prior period adjustments due to errors in clients’financial reporting increase, the likelihood of issuance the modified audit opinion has increased. In addition, the evidence suggested that the higher level of abnormal accruals and abnormal real activities to manage earnings has strengthened the positive relationship between annual adjustments and likelihood of issuance modified audit opinion. In fact, annual adjustments and earnings management as consequences of errors and misstatement in clients' financial reporting expose auditors to litigation risk, which is expected to result in more auditors effort and audit quality in risk-based audit process. In such circumstances, the auditors act conservatively in order to reduce the potential litigation risk and respond by issuance the modified audit opinion.Key words: Modified Audit Opinion, Litigation Risk, Errors & Misstatement in Financial Reporting.
Abstract Considering the importance of potential litigation risk motives in the risk-based audit process, this paper assessed the impact of annual audit adjustments and earnings management due to material errors & misstatement in clients' financial reporting on the modified audit opinion. Research population includes 131 listed firms in Tehran Securities & Exchange over the period March 2012 till March 2020. Research Hypotheses analyzed using multivariate binary logit regression models based on firm-year observations. Findings showed that more earnings management due to misstatement in clients’ financial reporting lead to increase the likelihood of issuance the modified opinion by auditors. Also, as the prior period adjustments due to errors in clients’financial reporting increase, the likelihood of issuance the modified audit opinion has increased. In addition, the evidence suggested that the higher level of abnormal accruals and abnormal real activities to manage earnings has strengthened the positive relationship between annual adjustments and likelihood of issuance modified audit opinion. In fact, annual adjustments and earnings management as consequences of errors and misstatement in clients' financial reporting expose auditors to litigation risk, which is expected to result in more auditors effort and audit quality in risk-based audit process. In such circumstances, the auditors act conservatively in order to reduce the potential litigation risk and respond by issuance the modified audit opinion.
امیری، اسماعیل و حسین فخاری، (1400)، "خرید اظهارنظر حسابرس و کیفیت گزارشگری مالی: با رویکرد الگوی معادلات همزمان"، دانش حسابرسی، ۲۱ (82)، صص 58-27.
امیری، اسماعیل و حسین فخاری، (1400)، "خرید اظهارنظر حسابرس و کیفیت حسابرسی: الگوی معادلات همزمان"، حسابداری مالی، ۱۳ (۴۹)، صص 138-110.
اميري، اسماعيل و حسین فخاري، (1399)، "شاخص تركيبي براي خريد اظهارنظر حسابرس مبتني بر فن تحليل مميزي"، بررسي‌هاي حسابداري و حسابرسي، 27 (1)، صص 31-1.
بزرگ¬اصل، موسی و مریم دهقانی فیروزآبادی، (1394)، "بررسی رابطه اقلام تعهدی اختیاری با تعدیلات سنواتی و نوع اظهارنظر حسابرس"، دانش حسابداری مالی، 2 (3)، صص 103-89.
بشیری¬منش، نازنین و ملیحه پاکدل، (1398)، "کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و بندهای¬تعدیلی حسابرسی"، حسابداری و منافع اجتماعی، 9 (1)، صص 87-67.
بنی¬مهد، بهمن، یحیی حساس¬یگانه و نرگس یزدانیان، (1393)، "مدیریت سود و اظهارنظر حسابرس: شواهدي از بخش خصوصی حسابرسی"، حسابداري مدیریت، 7 (21)، صص 32-17.
پیری، پرویز و ماربه قربانی، (1396)، "ارزيابي رابطه بين نوع اظهار نظر حسابرس مستقل و كيفيت سود"، بررسی¬های حسابداري و حسابرسی، 24 (4)، صص 502-483.
حساس¬یگانه، یحیی، قاسم بولو و فاطمه فرخی¬نژاد، (1389)، "رابطه بین اقلام تعهدی اختیاری و گزارش حسابرس"، دانش حسابرسی، ۱۰ (۳)، صص 21-6.
حسینی‌پور، رضا، محمدعلی باقرپور ولاشانی و مهدی صالحی، (1396)، "شناسایی متغیرهای مالی و غیر مالی مؤثر بر مبانی تعدیل گزارش حسابرسی مرتبط با برآوردهای حسابداری: رویکرد داده کاوی"، دانش حسابرسی، ۱۷ (۶۶)، صص 130-107.
حيدرپور، فرزانه و معصومه توحيدلو، (1391)، "تأثير اقلام تعهدي غيرعادي بر گزارشگري حسابرسي"، بررسی¬های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 19 (4)، صص 50-33.
خواجوی، شکراله و فرشید احمدی فارسانی، (1399)، "بررسی تأثیر مدیریت حسابرسی بر توانایی کشف مدیریت سود توسط حسابرسان"، دانش حسابرسی، ۲۰ (78)، صص 323-304.
خواجوی، شکراله، مصطفی کاظم‌نژاد، علی اصغر دهقانی‌سعدی و علیرضا ممتازیان، (1397)، "بررسی سودمندی روش‌های مختلف انتخاب متغیرهای پیش‌بین در پیش‌بینی نوع اظهارنظر حسابرسان"، پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری، 8 (1)، صص 102-81.
رحیمیان، نظام¬الدین، محمدتقی تقوی¬فرد و آیدا مالکی¬دیزجی، (1396)، "رابطه بین اقلام تعهدی و اظهارنظر حسابرسی"، پژوهش¬های نوین در حسابداری و حسابرسی، 1 (2)، صص 64-37.
روزبهانی، فاطمه، بهمن بنی¬مهد و مهدی مرادزاده فرد، (1396)، "رابطه میان دستکاری سود و گزارش غیرمقبول حسابرسی"، دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 6 (23)، صص 153-145.
طالب¬نیا، قدرت¬اله و هژار رحمانی، (1392)، "رابطه بین نوع حسابرس و نوع گزارش حسابرس با شاخص مدیریت سود"، پژوهش¬های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 5 (19)، صص 42-23.
عباس‌زاده، محمدرضا، مهدی صالحی و رضا حسینی‌پور، (1396)، "فراتحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر اظهارنظر حسابرسی تعدیل شده"، پژوهش‌های کاربردی در گزارشگری مالی، 6 (1)، صص 126-89.
فروزنده، جواد، ناصر ایزدی‌نیا و سعید دائی کریم‌زاده، (1400)، "تأثیر شدت تجدید ارائه صورت‌های مالی بر نوع اظهار نظر حسابرس و بندهای گزارش حسابرسی (شواهدی از کیفیت صورت‌های مالی)"، دانش حسابرسی، 21 (82)، صص 321-298.
قدیم¬پور، جواد، محسن دستگیر و ناصر ایزدی¬نیا، (1395)، "بررسی ارتباط بین عوامل مؤثر بر ریسک دادخواهی حسابرسان و اظهارنظر تعدیل شده حسابرسی"، دانش حسابرسی، 16 (65)، صص 96-77.
کاردان، بهزاد، مهدی صالحی و حسین و کلاته، (1395)، "رابطه بین اظهارنظر حسابرس، اقلام تعهدی اختیاری و ریسک مالی"، پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 8 (31)، صص 125-111.
کاظمی علوم، مهدی، مصطفی عبدی، حسن زلقی و حسین جلالوند، (1399)، "تأثیر خوانایی گزارشگری مالی بر معیارهای ریسک پروژه حسابرسی"، بررسیهای حسابداری و حسابرسی، 27 (2)، صص 230-202.
لاری دشت‌بیاض، محمود، محمدجواد ساعی و عبداله آزاد، (1399)، "مبانی تعدیل اظهارنظر حسابرس و مدیریت سود"، تحقیقات حسابداري و حسابرسي، 12 (45)، صص 40-23.
مرادي، محمد، محمد اصوليان و محمد نوروزی، (1393)، "اظهارنظر حسابرس و مديريت سود با تأكيد بر ابهام در تداوم فعاليت"، بررسي¬هاي حسابداري و حسابرسي، 21 (3)، صص 328-313.
مشایخ، شهناز، منا پارسایی و اکرم کرانی، (1400)، "رابطه بین مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت‌ها با کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری و گزارش حسابرس"، پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 13 (51)، صص 64-41.
وکیلی‌فرد، حمیدرضا، قدرت اله طالب‌نیا و امید صباغیان طوسی، (1395)، "اثرکیفیت حسابرسی بر اقلام تعهدی اختیاری و ارائه گزارش حسابرسی مشروط"، پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، 8 (29)، صص 124-97.
Agus, A., & Ghozali, I., (2019), “Mediating Effect of Audit Quality in Relationship between Auditor Ethics and Litigation: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7 (2), PP. 91-100.
Amat, O.R., & Elvira, O.S., (2010), “Earnings Management and Audit Adjustments: an Empirical Study of Listed Companies”, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 7 (1), PP. 50-61.
Arnedo, L., Lizarraga, F. & Sanchez, S., (2008), “Discretionary Accruals & Auditor Behavior in Code-law Contexts: An Application to Failing Spanish Firms”, European Accounting Review, 17(4), PP. 641-666.
Athavale, M., Gou, Z., Meng, Y., & Zhang, T., (2022), “Diversity of Signing Auditors and Audit Quality: Evidence from Capital Market in China”, International Review of Economics & Finance, 78, PP. 554-571.
Barron, O., Pratt, J., & Stice, J.D., (2001), “Misstatement Direction, Litigation Risk and Planned Audit Investment”, Journal of Accounting Research, 39 (3), PP. 449-462.
Bartov, E., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. S. L. (2001), “Discretionary-accruals Models and Audit Qualifications”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), PP. 421-452.
Boone, Jeff P., Khurana, Inder K., & Raman, K. K., (2011), “Litigation Risk and Abnormal Accruals”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30 (2), PP. 231-256.
Bradshaw, M. T., Richardson, S. A. & Sloan, R. G., (2001), “Do Analysts and Auditors Use Information in Accruals?”, Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), PP. 45-74.
Bradshaw, M.T., Richardson, S.A., Sloan, R.G., (1999), “Earnings Quality and Financial Reporting Credibility: An Empirical Investigation”, Working Paper, University of Michigan.
Butler, M., Leone, A.J. & Willenborg, M., (2004), “An Empirical Analysis of Auditor Reporting & Its Association with Abnormal Accruals”, Journal of Accounting & Economics,37(2), PP. 139-165.
Carcello, J.V., & Palmrose, Z.V., (1994), “Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients”, Journal of Accounting Research, Studies on Accounting, Financial Disclosures and the Law, 32, PP. 1-30.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L., (2003), “Auditor Reporting Behavior when GAAS Lack Specificity: the Case of SAS No59”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22 (1), PP. 63-81.
Carson, E., Fargher, N., Geiger, M., Lennox, C., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M., (2013), “Auditor Reporting for Going-concern Uncertainty: A Research Synthesis”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32 (Suppl.1), PP. 353-384.
Chen, F., Francis, J.R., & Hou, Y., (2019), “Opinion Shopping through Same-Firm Audit Office Switches”, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2899888.
Chen, F., Lam, K., Smieliauskas, W., & Ye, M., (2016), “Auditor Conservatism & Banks Measurement Uncertainty during the Financial Crisis”, International Journal of Auditing, 20(1), PP. 52-65.
Chen, F., Peng, S., Xue, Sh., Yang, Zh., & Ye, F., (2015), “Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner-Level Evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), PP. 79-112.
Choi, J.H., Chung, H., Sonu, H.C.H, & Zang, Y., (2019), “Opinion Shopping to Avoid a Going Concern Audit Opinion and Subsequent Audit Quality”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38 (2), PP. 101-123.
Choi, J.H., Kim, J.B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. A., (2008), “Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross-country Evidence”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (1), PP. 55-99.
Chy, M., De Franco, G., & Su, B., (2021), “The Effect of Auditor Litigation Risk on Clients' Access to Bank Debt: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71 (1), PP. 101354.
Christensen, B.E., Schmardebeck, R., & Seidel, T.A., (2022), “Do Auditors’ Incentives Affect Materiality Assessments of Prior-Period Misstatements?”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Forthcoming, In Press, 101332.
Czerney, K., Schmidt, J. J., & Thompson, A. M., (2014), “Does Auditor Explanatory Language in Unqualified Audit Reports Indicate Increased Financial Misstatement Risk?”, The Accounting Review, 89 (6), PP. 2115-2149.
Davidson, W.N., Jiraporn, P., & DaDalt, P., (2006), “Causes and Consequences of Audit Shopping: An Analysis of Auditor Opinions, Earnings Management and Auditor Changes”, Quarterly Journalof Business and Economics, 45(1-2), PP. 69-87.
DeAngelo, L.E., (1981), “Auditor Size and Audit Quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (3), PP. 183-199.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P., (1995), “Detecting Earnings Management”, Accounting Review, 70(2), PP. 193-225.
DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J., (2014), “A Review of Archival Auditing Research”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58 (2-3), PP. 275-326.
DeFond, M. L., Chee, Y, L., & Zaang, Y., (2016), “Client Conservatism and Auditor-Client Contracting”, The Accounting Review, 90(1), PP. 69-98.
Dopuch, N., King, R. R., & Schatzberg, J. W., (1994), “An Experimental Investigation of Alternative Damage-sharing Liability Regimes with an Auditing Perspective”, Journal of Accounting Research, 32 (Supplement), PP. 103-130.
Dye, R.A., (1993), “Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth”, Journal of Political Economy, 101 (5), PP. 887-914.
Fan, Y., Li, C., Nagarajan, N., & Smith, J., (2015), “Auditor Litigation, Audit Office Pricing and Client Acceptance”, Texas A&M University, Mid-year Auditing Conference
Firth, M., Mo, P. L. L., & Wong, R. M. K., (2012), “Auditors’ Organizational form, Legal Liability and Reporting Conservatism: Evidence from China”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 29 (1), PP. 57-93.
Felix, W.L., & Kinney, W.R., (1982), “Research in the Auditor’s Opinion Formulation Process: State of the Art”, The Accounting Review, 62 (2), PP. 247-71.
Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J., (1999), “Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), PP. 135-165.
Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D., (2009), “Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality”, Accounting Review, 84(5), PP. 1521-1552.
Francis, J., (2004), “What Do We Know about Audit Quality?”, British Accounting Review, 36 (4), PP. 345-368.
Gajevsky, A., (2014), “The Impact of Auditor`s Opinion on Earnings Management: Evidence from Romania, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, The Institute of Doctoral Studies, Faculty of Accounting”, Network Intelligence Studies, 1 (3), PP. 61-73.
Garcia Osma, B., Gill-de-Albornoz, B., deLas Heras, E., & Rusanescu, S., (2018), “Opinion Shopping: Firm versus Partner-Level Evidence”, Working Papers, Serie EC 2016-02, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
Geiger, M. A, Raghunandan, K., & Dasaratha, V. R., (2006), “Auditor Decision-Making in Different Litigation Environments: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Audit Reports and Audit Firm Size”, Journal of Accounting and public Policy, 25 (3), PP. 332-353.
Geiger, M.A., Raghunandan, K., & Riccardi, W., (2014), “The Global Financial Crisis: U.S. Bankruptcies and Goingconcern Audit Opinions”, Accounting Horizons, 28 (1), PP. 59-75.
Geiger, M.A., & Rama, D.V., (2006), “Audit Firm Size and Going-concern Reporting Accuracy”, Accounting Horizons, 20 (1), PP. 1-17.
Giordani, M. de S., de Souza Neto, J.M.A., & da Cunha, P.R., (2020), “The Influence of Auditors’ Litigation Risk on Audit and Non-audit Fees”, Journal of Education and Research in Accounting, 14 (4), PP. 427-442.
Gramling, A. A., Schatzberg, J. W., Bailey, A. D., & Zhang, H., (1998), “The Impact of Legal Liability Regimes and Differential Client Risk on Client Acceptance, Audit Pricing, and Audit Effort Decisions”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 13 (4), PP. 437-460.
Green, W., Czernkowski, R., Wang, Y., (2009), “Special Treatment Regulation in China: Potential Unintended Consequences”, Asian Review of Accounting, 17 (2), PP. 28-49.
Gul, F. A., Tsui, J. S.L., & Chen, C. J., (1998), “Agency Costs and Audit Pricing: Evidence on Discretionary Accruals”, Working Paper, Available at https://ssrn.com
Gul, F.A., Ma, S., Lai, K., (2017), “Busy Auditors, Partner-client Tenure & Audit Quality: Evidence from an Emerging Market”, Journal of International Accounting Research, 16 (1), PP. 83-105.
Habib, A., (2013), “A Meta-analysis of the Determinants of Modified Audit Opinion Decisions”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 28 (3), PP. 184-216.
Habib, A., Jiang, H., Bhuiyan, Md. B. U., & Islam, A., (2014), “Litigation Risk, Financial Reporting and Auditing: A Survey of the Literature”, Research in Accounting Regulation, 26 (2), PP. 145-163.
He, X., Kothari, S.P., Xiao, T., & Zuo, L., (2018), “Long-term Impact of Economic Conditions on Auditors’ Judgment”, Accounting Review, 93 (6), PP. 203-229.
Heninger, W. G., (2001), “The Association between Auditor Litigation and Abnormal Accruals”, The Accounting Review, 76 (1), PP. 111-126.
Herbohn, K., & Ragunathan, V., (2008), “Auditor Reporting and Earnings Management: Some Additional Evidence”, Accounting and Finance, 48 (4), PP. 575-601.
Herly, M., Bartholdy, J., & Thinggaard, F., (2012), “Earnings Quality in Restating Firms: Empirical Evidence”, Master Thesis, Economics & Business Department, Aarhus University.
Ianniello, G., & Galloppo, G., (2015), “Stock Market Reaction to Auditor Opinions: Italian Evidence”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 30 (6/7), PP. 610-632.
Johl, S., Jubb, C., & Houghton, K., (2007), “Earnings Management and the Audit Opinion: Evidence from Malaysia”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 22 (7), PP. 688-715.
Kaplan, S. E., & Williams, D. D., (2013), “Do Going Concern Audit Reports Protect Auditors from Litigation? A Simultaneous Equations Approach”, The Accounting Review, 88 (1), PP. 199-232.
Kartika, T. P. D., & Nahumury, J., (2014), “The Effect of Litigation Risks to Earnings Management Using Audit Quality as Moderating Variable”, Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 17 (2), PP. 303-312.
Krishnan, J., & Zhang, Y., (2005), “Auditor Litigation Risk and Corporate Disclosure of Quarterly Review Repor”t, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24 (1), PP. 115-138.
Kryzanowski, L., & Zhang, Y., (2013), “Financial Restatements and Sarbanes Oxley: Impact on Canadian firm Governance and Management Turnover”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 21, PP. 87-105.
Lai, K-W., & Gul, F.A., (2021), “Do Failed Auditors Receive Lower Audit Fees from Continuing Engagements?”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 56(3), PP. 1159-1190.
Laux, V., & Newman, D. P., (2010), “Auditor Liability and Client Acceptance Decisions”, The Accounting Review, 85 (1), PP. 261-285.
Lennox, C., & Li, B., (2014), “Accounting Misstatements Following Lawsuits against Auditors”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(1), PP. 58-75.
Lennox, C., Wu, X., & Zhang, T., (2016), “The Effect of Audit Adjustments on Earnings Quality: Evidence from China”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61 (2-3), PP. 545-562.
Lennox, C., Wang, Z-T., & Wu, X., (2018), “Earnings Management, Audit Adjustments, and the Financing of Corporate Acquisitions: Evidence from China”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65 (1), PP. 21-40.
Lu, T., (2006), “Does Opinion Shopping Impair Auditor Independence and Audit Quality?”, Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), PP. 561-583.
Melumad, N. D., & Thoman, L., (1990), “On Auditors and the Courts in an Adverse Selection Setting”, Journal of Accounting Research, 28 (1), PP. 77-120.
Mock, T., Bedard, J., Coram, P., Davis, S., Espahbodi, R., & Warne, R., (2013), “The Audit Reporting Model: Current Research Synthesis and Implications”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32 (1), PP. 323-351.
Muramiya, K., & Takada, T., (2010), “Auditor Conservatism, Abnormal Accruals, and Going Concern Opinions”, Working Paper, Available at: www.b.kobeu.ac.jp.
Muzatko, S. R., Johnstone, K. M., Mayhew, B. W., & Rittenberg, L. E., (2004), “An Empirical Investigation of IPO Underpricing and the Change to the LLP Organization of Audit Firms”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23 (1), PP. 53-67.
Newton, N.J., Persellin, J.S., Wang, D., Wilkins, M.S., (2016), “Internal Control Opinion Shopping and Audit Market Competition”, The Accounting Review, 91(2), PP. 603-623.
Palmrose, Z.V., (1988), “An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality”, The Accounting Review, 63 (1), PP. 55-73.
Palmrose, Z.V., Richardson, V.J., & Scholz, S., (٢٠٠٤), “Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, ٣٧ (1), PP. ٥٩-٨٩.
Pierre, S.K., & Anderson, J.A, (1984), “An Analysis of the Factors Associated with Lawsuits against Public Accountants”, The Accounting Review, 59 (2), PP. 242-263.
Reid, L.C., Carcello, J.V., Li, C., Neal, T.L., & Francis, J.R., (2019), “Impact of Auditor Report Changes on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), PP. 1501-1539.
Rittenberg, L.E., Johnstone, K.M., & Gramling, A.A., (2012), “Auditing: A Business Risk Approach”, 8th ed., South-Western CENGAGE Learning, Mason, OH
1. Roychowdhury, S., (2006), “Earnings Management through Real Activities Manipulation”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42 (3), PP. 335-370.
Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Aguilar, G.N., & López, B.E., (2006), “Long-term Audit Engagements and Opinion Shopping: Spanish Evidence”, Accounting Forum, 30(1), PP. 61-79.
Sengupta, P., & Shen, M., (2007), “Can Accruals Quality Explain Auditors’ Decision Making? The Impact of Accruals Quality on Audit Fees, Going Concern Opinions and Auditor Change”, Working Paper, Available at: http://ssrn.com
Stice, J. D., (1991), “Using Financial & Market Information to Identify Pre-Engagement Factors Associated with Lawsuits Against Auditors”, The Accounting Review, 66 (3), PP. 516-533.
Sulcaj, V., (2020), “Litigation Risk, Financial Reporting Quality, and Critical Audit Matters in the Audit Report: Early U.S. Evidence”, Von Allmen School of Accountancy, Gatton College of Business & Economics, University of Kentucky, 2020 Conference on Auditing and Capital Markets Academic Presenters.
Tang, Y., (2011), “Audit Fees, Motivation of Avoiding loss and Opinion Shopping”, China Finance Review International, 1 (3), PP. 241-261.
Tommasetti, R., Neusa Maria Bastos F. Santos; Marcelo Álvaro da Silva Macedo & Alfredo Sarlo Neto, (2018), “Relationship between Modified Audit Opinion, Earnings Management and Auditor Size: Evidence from Brazil”, Pensar Contábil, Rio de Janeiro, 20(72), PP. 50-57.
Tsipouridou, M., & Spathis, Ch., (2014), “Audit Opinion and Earnings Management: Evidence from Greece”, Accounting Forum, 38 (1), PP. 38- 54.
Utomo, ST. D., Machmuddah, Z., & Pamungkas, I.D., (2019), “The Effect of Litigation Risk and Audit Quality on Earnings Management: Evidence in Indonesi”, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 16, PP. 328-336.
Watkins, A. L., Hillison, W., & Morecroft, S. E., (2004), “Audit Quality: A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, PP. 153-193.
Wiedman, C.I., & Hendricks, K.B., (2013), “Firm Accrual Quality Surrounding Restatements: A Signaling View”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 40 (9-10), PP. 1095-1125.
Wong, R.M. K., Firth, M. A., & Lo, A. W. Y., (2018), “The Impact of Litigation Risk on the Association between Audit Quality and Auditor Size: Evidence from China”, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 29 (3), PP. 280-311.
Xiao, T., Geng, C., & Yuan, C., (2020), “How Audit Effort Affects Audit Quality: An Audit Process and Audit Output Perspective”, China Journal of Accounting Research, 13 (1), PP. 109-127.
Zhang, X., Cao, L., Li, W., Zhao, Q., & Li, L., (2022), “Does Litigation Risk Increase Audit Effort?”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Published online