تجزیه وتحلیل عملکرد منابع انسانی با رویکرد DEA دو مرحله ای در شرکت آذر نوش شکوفه
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی
HAMIDREZA ASILFARID
1
,
Mehran Khalaj
2
,
Maryam Zaeri
3
1 - Instructor of Free University of Robat Karim Branch
2 - Assistant professor of Industrial Engeenering, Robat Karim Branch, Islamic Azad University, Robat Karim, Iran
3 - Quality Control Manager
کلید واژه: ارزیابی عملکردمنابع انسانی, تحلیل پوششی دادهای دو فرایندی, اثربخشی, کارایی,
چکیده مقاله :
سنجش و ارزیابی همواره مورد توجه انسان بوده است . ارزیابی عملکرد منابع انسانی برای سازمانها و مدیران بسیار مورد توجه قرار گرفته است که نقش بسیارمهم و راهبردی را دارا شده است وازعناصرتأثیر گذار بر مزیت رقابتی سازمان محسوب می شود . در این مقاله ازکاربرد تحلیل پوششی دادهای دو مرحله ای (DEA) در تجزیه وتحلیل کارایی و عملکرد کارکنان بهره برده شده است. هرچند مدل‌های کاربردی مختلفی در این حوزه ارائه شده‌است اما این مدل‌ها با مشکلاتی مواجه هستند و تمامی نیازهای تصمیم‌گیران را برآورده نمی‌سازند. مدل کاربردی ارائه شده در این تحقیق، مشکلات مدل‌های پیشین را که تکیه برفاکتور های به غیر ساعات اضافه کار ، حقوق ، مرخصی به عنوان ورودی اولیه و ساعات مفید کاری وساعات میزان حضور در جلسات آموزشی به عنوان خروجی میانی ومقدار تولِید سالم ، و تولید ناسالم برای در نظرگرفتن خروجی نهای می باشد را دارند ، کامل کرده ومرتفع می نمایید . در نتیجه، یکی از روشهای جدید ارزیابی عملکرد کارکنان، روش تحلیل پوششی داده است که یک روش چند معیاره برای تصمیم‌گیری و سنجش عملکرد کارکنان و شرکتها می‌باشد. مدل کاربردی پیشنهادی در ارزیابی کارایی و اثربخشی وعملکرد کارکنان شرکت آذر نوش شکوفه مورد استفاده قرار گرفته و تحلیلی جهت بهبوده هم زمان کارایی و اثربخشی هر یک از کارکنان وعملکرد بهینه تولید در اختیار تصمیم‌گیران قرار می‌دهد.
Evaluation and assessment has been always considered by human beings. Human resources performance evaluation has been considered for organization and managers, so that has owned very important and conductive role and considered as one of the effective elements on organizational competition priorities. In this article, personnel’s’ performance and efficiency analysis has been operated by 2 stage DEA function. However, different functional models have been presented in this field but include some difficulties and do not meet all decision makers’ needs. The provided functional model in this research has resolved all previous models difficulties which are not only based on factors such as extra work hours, salaries and day off as primal entrance, effective working hour and availability of being in learning sessions as middle entrance, the amount of valid production and invalid production as final entrance. As result one of the newest personnel performance assessment is DEA that is multi-criteria method for determining and evaluating companies and personnel’s’ performance. The purposed operational model has been used in assessing efficiency and effectiveness of AZARNOOSH SHEKOUFEH’s personnel’s performances, and analysis for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of each personnel and production optimized performance fro decision makers.
_||_
1- Alvani, M. (2010). General management. Ney Publishing. Tehran. (In Persian).
2- Arabmaldart, A & Husseinzadeh Saljooghi, F. (2017). Strengthening DEA models for identifying the worst performance units. Journal of Operation Research in its Applications.14 (3), 18-31. (In Persian).
3- Hamid Reza Asil Farid, & Mehran khalaj. (2017). Evaluating and improving of two processes (two stages) systems function with DEA. Journal of Industrial Managmant.41,(4).57-72
4- Asmild, M., Paradi, J. C., Reese, D. N., and Tam, F., (2007). Measuring overall efficiency and effectiveness using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(1), 305-321.
5- Andreou, P., Daphna, E. & Louca, C. (2013). Managerial ability and firm performance
Evidence from the global financial crisis. from http://www.efmaefm.org.
6- Castelli, L., Pesenti, R. and Ukovich, W. (2004). DEA-like models for the efficiency evalution of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(6), 456-476.
7- Castelli, L., Pesenti, R. and Ukovich, W. (2001) DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdepent units", European Journal of Operational Research, 132(5), 274-286.
8- Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
9- Chiou, Y., Lan, L. W., & Yen, B. T. (2010). A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 477-489.
10- Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35-49.
11- Fee, C. & Hadlock, C. (2003). Raids, rewards, and reputations in the market for managerial talent. Review of Financial Studies, 16(4), 1315–1357.
12- Joo, S., Stoeberl, P. A., & Kwon, I. G. (2007). Benchmarking efficiencies and strategies for resale operations of a charity organization. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 14(4), 455-464.
13- Lewis H. and Sexton, T. (2001). Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 227-249.
14- Leverty, J. & Grace, M. (2009). Dupes or incompetents an examination of management’s impact on property-liability insurer distress. Working Paper, Georgia State University press.
15- Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55(7), 643-653.
16- Mehregan, M. (2013). Models of Enterprise Competitiveness Measurement. Tehran University Publisher. (In Persian).
17- Mansourfar, Gh., Didar, H. & Hasanpour, V. (2015). The effect of management capability the quality of companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Preceding studies, 7(1), 37-54.
18- Leverty, J. & Grace, M. (2009). Dupes or incompetents an examination of management’s impacton property-liability insurer distress. Working Paper, Georgia State University press.
19- Matemilola, BT., Bany-Ariffin, AN. & Azman-Saini, WNW. (2013). Impact of leverage and managerial skills on shareholders return. Journal of Procedia Economics and Finance, 2(7), 103-115.
20- Piri, P, Didar, E. & Yazdani, S. (2015). The effect of management ability the quality of financial reporting throughout the life cycle, listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Researches, 6(3), 99-118.
21- Pierce, J. (1997). Efficiency progress in the New South Wales government: presented at the International Conference on Public Sector Efficiency, University of New South Wales, 27 and 28 November 1997. Sydney, NSW: NSW Treasury.
22- Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243-252.