Impact of Googling Techniques on Deaf and Hearing-Impaired Students’ L2 Writing Performance
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Asma Qoreishi kolaqani
1
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi
2
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
Hadi Salehi
3
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
Omid Tabatabaei
4
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Syntactic Errors, Deaf and hearing-impaired, deaf community, error categorization, error dentification,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed to investigate the syntactic errors that the Iranian deaf and hearing-impaired (DHI) make in their L2 writings. To this purpose, 60 male and female Iranian DHI students with different social status were selected, through convenience sampling procedure, as participants from among the students of a deaf community in Bandar Abbas, Iran. Their general writing performance was assessed through a proficiency test (pre-test) before they received a six-week writing instruction, in which they were provided with model written utterances and common syntactic points such as sentence order, word order, subject/verb agreement, etc. At the end of the treatment, they were given two topics and asked to write short paragraphs (post-test). Then, different syntactic errors were spotted, analyzed and categorized based on Keshavarz’s linguistic taxonomy of errors. The obtained results indicated that the writing quality of the participants improved from pre-test to post-test. It was also found that majority of the participants committed more syntactic omission errors than syntactic addition errors and syntactic substitution errors. It was further found that syntactic errors in written language were not affected by the gender and social class of the participants. The findings of this study provide empirical evidence for teaching syntactic order to deaf and hearing-impaired students in order to enhance their L2 writing performance.
k
Antia, S. D., Reed, S., & Kreimeyer, K. H. (2005). Written language of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in public schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 244–255.
Arfe, B., & Perondi, I. (2008). Deaf and hearing students' referential strategies in writing: What referential cohesion tells us about deaf students ‘literacy development. First Language, 28, 355-374.
Cawthon, Stephanie W. (2001). Teaching Strategies in Inclusive Classrooms with Deaf Students. University of Wisconsin–Madison. Oxford Press.
Cheng, S., & Rose, S. (2008). Assessing Written Expression for Students Who is deaf or hard of hearing: Curriculum based measurement (Report No 11). Minnesota: Research Institute on Progress Monitoring.
Defazio, et al. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum- A case study. Journal of the Scholarship of teaching and learning, 10(2). pp. 34- 47.
Giddens, E. (2009). Teaching written language to students who are deaf or hard of hearing [Master’s thesis].
Heefner, D. L., & Shaw, P. C. (1996). Assessing the written narratives of deaf students using the six-trait analytical scale. The Volta Review,98(1), 147–168.
Kilpatrick, J. R. (2015). Developing a Written Language Inventory for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students: A Systemic Functional Grammar Approach [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Tennessee.
Nonkukhetkhong, K. (2013). Grammatical Error Analysis of the First Year English Major Students, Udon Thani Rajabhat University. The Asian Conference on Language Learning 2013 Official Conference Proceedings. pp. 117-126.
Oyewumi A. (2008). An investigation on inclusive instructional practices and learning of students with hearing impairments in post-secondary schools.
Reubell, S. (2010). How to Teach Deaf Students to Read. Retrieved December, from e How.comhttp://www.ehow.com/how_5079105_teach-deaf-students read. Html # Ixzz1 dOYjd1fi.
Rodrigues, M. G. G., Abdo, A. G. R., & Carnio, M. S. (2012). Influence of the type of visual stimulus in the written production of deaf signers without complaints of writing impairments. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 17(2), retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342012000200018.
Seyabi, F.A. & Tuzlukova, V. (2014). Writing Problems and Strategies: An Investigative Study in the Omani School and University Context. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 3(4). pp. 37-48.
Subasini, M. & Kokilavani,B . (2013).Significance of grammar in teaching English. International Journal of English Literature and Culture, 1(13). pp. 56-58. DOI: 10.14662/IJEL C2013.022.
Wolbers, K. A., Dostal, H. M., & Bowers, L. M. (2012). ―I was born full deaf. ‖ Written language outcomes after 1 year of strategic and interactive writing instruction. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 19-38.
Yahya, A. et al. (2012). Error Analysis of L2 Learners’ Writings, a Case Study. 2012 International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture IPEDR, 33. pp. 114-118.
