Effects of Different Corrective Feedback Types on Reducing Iranian Test-takers’ Speaking Anxiety: Lower- and Upper-intermediate Levels
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Samin Seyedebrahimi
1
(English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Iran)
Fariba Rahimi Esfahani
2
(English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran)
Mehrdad Sepehri
3
(English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran)
کلید واژه: Feedback, speaking anxiety, explicit correction,
چکیده مقاله :
The current study explored the effects of different feedback types on reducing Iranian test-takers’ speaking anxiety at the lower- and upper-intermediate levels. For this purpose, 90 male and female learners aged 21 to 45, who were preparing themselves to take the IELTS Mock test, were selected through a convenient sampling method and divided into lower-intermediate and upper-intermediate levels on the basis of the Oxford Placement Test (OPT) results. Then, they underwent ten treatment sessions of recast, explicit, metalinguistic, and clarification corrective feedback. To measure the anxiety in speaking performance, Chowdhury’s (2014) questionnaire was given to the participants once before treatment and once after the treatment. Then, the score of each learner was calculated and recorded for the data analysis. The obtained results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference among the feedback types regarding the participants’ speaking anxiety at the lower-intermediate as well as the upper-intermediate level. The implication of this finding is that teachers should constantly implement different types of corrective feedback in their classes to help students with their speaking anxiety problems.
Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. RELC Journal,12(2), 183-210.
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). Does one size fit all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 543-574.
Basic, L. (2011). Speaking anxiety: An obstacle to second language learning? University of
Gavle. Faculty of Education and Business Studies, 11, 1-25.
Chowdhury, S. (2014). Learner’s foreign language speaking anxiety: A tertiary level scenario in an EFL class. A thesis submitted to the department of English and Humanities of BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Dekeyser, R. M. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 77(4), 501-514.
Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review. Auckland: Research Division.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed), Planning and task performance. (pp.3-36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gregersen, T, & Horwitz, EK. (2002). Language learning and perfectionism: anxious and non-anxious. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 562–570.
Gregersen, T, Macintyre, PD, Meza, MD. (2014). The motion of emotion: idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 574– 588.
Hamidi, H. (2015). Research in applied linguistics. Retrieved from http:// www. iranelt. com/ index.php/introduction-to-research-methods.
Irzeqat, N. (2010). The effect of anxiety on the oral performance of Palestinian students of English from the perspectives of teachers and students (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Hebron University.
Kozlova, I. (2010). Reader’s response to Ellis’s corrective feedback in a problem-solving context. ELT Journal, 64(1), 95-98.
Lin, Y-H., &Hedgcock, J. (1996). Negative feedback incorporation among High-proficiency, low-proficiency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning, 46(4), 567- 611.
London, M., & Sessa, V. I. (2009). Group feedback for continuous learning. Human Resource Development Review, 5(3), 303-329.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake. SSLA, 20(3), 37-66.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language teaching, 46(1), 1-40.DOI:10.1017/S0261444812000365
Mufidah, Z. M. (2017). The impact of oral corrective feedback on the level of language anxiety. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 145, 219-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.48
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6,186-214.
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake across educational settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263-300.
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., &Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.) Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 171–195). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Yilmaz, Y. (2016). The role of exposure condition in the effectiveness of explicit correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 65-96.
Young, DJ. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: what does language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75, 426–439. https:/doi.Org/10. 1111/j.1540-4781. 1991.tb05378.x.
Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in the second language: Investigating the effect of the teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 42(1), 288-295.
Zhai, K., & Gao, X. (2018). Effects of corrective feedback on EFL speaking task complexity in China’s university classroom. Cogent Education, 5, 1-13.
Zohrabi, M., Farrokhi, F., & Chehrazad, M. (2017). The effect of the corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners' speaking accuracy and breakdown fluency. Journal of Language Horizons, 6(1), 107-129.
