Relationship Between Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use and Learning Styles Using Structural Equation Modelling Across Age and Gender
محورهای موضوعی :
Behzad Hayatbakhsh Abbasi
1
,
Mehry Haddad Narafshan
2
,
Peyman Seifaddiny
3
1 - Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
کلید واژه: learning styles, vocabulary learning strategies, breadth and depth of vocabulary,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigated Iranian English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ use of vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) and its interrelationship with breadth of vocabulary knowledge (VK), depth of vocabulary knowledge and learning styles especially in relation to gender and age. There was a significant relationship between determination VLS and depth of VK. Learning styles of theorist, reflector and activist provided the basis for increasing and improving breadth of VK. Also, there was a significant and incremental (direct) relationship between theorist, reflector & activist learning styles with depth of VK. In three groups of theorist, reflector, and activist learning styles, social VLS provided the basis for increasing and improving breadth of VK. Also, in three groups of pragmatist, theorist & reflector learning styles, there is a significant and direct relationship between memory VLS and breadth of VK. In males group, there was a significant and direct effect between determination VLS and breadth of VK. Furthermore, in females group, there was a significant and direct relationship between social VLS and depth of VK. Considering the age of participants, in the age group of 20-24 years, there was a significant and direct relationship between metacognitive VLS and breadth of VK. However, in the age group of 25-30 years, there was a significant and direct relationship between cognitive VLS and breadth of VK. Given the important mediating effects of gender and age, it is proposed that vocabulary learning be strategically and stylistically integrated into the accumulative process of English learning.
This study investigated Iranian English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ use of vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) and its interrelationship with breadth of vocabulary knowledge (VK), depth of vocabulary knowledge and learning styles especially in relation to gender and age. There was a significant relationship between determination VLS and depth of VK. Learning styles of theorist, reflector and activist provided the basis for increasing and improving breadth of VK. Also, there was a significant and incremental (direct) relationship between theorist, reflector & activist learning styles with depth of VK. In three groups of theorist, reflector, and activist learning styles, social VLS provided the basis for increasing and improving breadth of VK. Also, in three groups of pragmatist, theorist & reflector learning styles, there is a significant and direct relationship between memory VLS and breadth of VK. In males group, there was a significant and direct effect between determination VLS and breadth of VK. Furthermore, in females group, there was a significant and direct relationship between social VLS and depth of VK. Considering the age of participants, in the age group of 20-24 years, there was a significant and direct relationship between metacognitive VLS and breadth of VK. However, in the age group of 25-30 years, there was a significant and direct relationship between cognitive VLS and breadth of VK. Given the important mediating effects of gender and age, it is proposed that vocabulary learning be strategically and stylistically integrated into the accumulative process of English learning.
Alahmadi, A. & Foltz, A. (2020). Effects of Language Skills and Strategy Use on Vocabulary Learning Through Lexical Translation and Inferencing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49, 975-991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09720-
Behforouz, B. & Al Ghaithi, A. (2022). Omani EFL Learners` Vocabulary Learning Strategies. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 13 (1), 285 – 299.
Cohen, A. D., & Dornyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles, and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170-190). London: Arnold.
Ehrman, M. E., & Leaver, B. L. (2003). Cognitive styles in the service of language learning. System, 31(3), 393-415.http://doi.org /10.1016/S0346-251X (03)000 50-2
Ehrman, M., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, L. R. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313-330.
Fan N (2020) Strategy Use in Second Language Vocabulary Learning and Its Relationships with the Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge: A Structural Equation Modeling Study. Front. Psychol. 11:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00752
My. D (2022). Insights into ESP Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Vietnamese Tertiary Students. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 38-49.
Nation, I. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1999). Learning strategies. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics
Petra. K (2018). Vocabulary learning strategies: General English vs English for Specific Purpose. INTED2018 Proceedings, 1693-1698.
Ramzan, F. (2021). Use of language learning strategies in ESP and EGP: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia, 28, 37-51.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scharle, A. & Szabo, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schimitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55- 88.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies in Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, eds N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 199–227.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmitt, N., Ng, C. J. W., & Garras, J. (2011). The Word Associates Format: Validation evidence. Language Testing, 28, 105–126
Siriwan, M. (2007). English vocabulary learning strategies employed by Rajabhat University students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Suranaree University of Technology Nakhoratchasima, Thailand.
Teng, F. Incidental vocabulary learning for primary school students: the effects of L2 caption type and word exposure frequency. Aust. Educ. Res. 46, 113–136 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0279-6
Tian Tian. (2019). The Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Concerning Vocabulary Size of Students in Chinese Universities. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 5(4), 80-85. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20190504.12
Tu, H. V. & H. T. Tham, (2023). A study of English vocabulary strategies used by English-major students at TNUT. IJCIRAS, 5 (9), 1-8.
Zhang, X., & Lu, X. (2015). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 740-753.
