Iranian EFL Learners' Willingness to Communicate, Self-Perceived Communication Competence, and Communication Apprehension in L1 and L2: A Comparative Study
محورهای موضوعی : language teaching
غزاله چراغپور سمواتی
1
(Department of English, Roudehen Branch,Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran)
نسیم گل آقایی
2
(Department of English, Roudehen Branch,Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran)
کلید واژه: Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, self-perceived communication competence,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study investigated the relationships among willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence in Persian (L1) versus English (L2). A total number of 235 adult native Persian EFL learners were selected through convenience sampling to participate in the study. The population consisted of 118 intermediate learners and 113 upper-intermediate learners. The transferability and predictability of these communication variables across L1 and L2 was checked through correlational analyses and linear regression. The findings showed that among these variables communication apprehension was more of a trait-like predisposition which was transferred across first language and foreign language. WTC in Persian had little predictive effect on WTC in English; also, self-perceived communication competence in Persian predicted only 15% of SPCC in English. Implications of findings could provide teachers insight into the extent to which these communication variables are trait-like or situational.
در عصر آموزش زبان به صورت محاوره ای اصلی ترین هدف از زبان آموزی تشویق زبان آموز به جستجوىفرصت های ارتباطی و تمایل آنان به برقراری ارتباط در چنین موقعیت ها شناخته شده است. از آنجایی که ارتباطبین تمایل به برقراری ارتباط و متغیرهای دیگر ممکن است به طرز قابل ملاحظه ای از فرهنگی به فرهنگ دیگرتغییر کند، مطالعه حاضر ارتباط بین تمایل به برقراری ارتباط، هراس از ارتباط و درک شخصی از توانایی برقراریارتباط در فارسی و انگلیسی را مورد بررسی قرار داد. تعداد 235 زبان آموز ایرانی بزرگسال فارسی زبان از طریقروش نمونه گیری در دسترس برای شرکت در این تحقیق انتخاب شدند. جامعه آماری متشکل از 118 زبان آموزسطح متوسط و 113 زبان آموز سطح متوسط رو به بالا بود. انتقال پذیری و قابل پیش بینی بودن متغیرهایارتباطی از زبان اول به زبان دوم توسط تحلیل درجه همبستگی و رگرسیون خطی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. یافتهها نشان داد که در بین متغیرهای ارتباطی، هراس از ارتباط بیشتر حالت یک صفت فردی را داشت که از زباناول به زبان خارجی منتقل می شد. تمایل به برقراری ارتباط درزبان فارسی به میزان بسیار کمی این تمایل را درزبان انگلیسی پیش بینی می کرد. همچنین درک شخصی از توانایی برقراری ارتباط در فارسی فقط 15 ٪ همینمتغیر در زبان انگلیسی را پیش بینی می کرد. یافته های این تحقیق می تواند به معلم ها در درک این موضوع کهکدام متغیرهای ارتباطی حالت یک صفت فردی را دارند یا بسته به موقعیت تغییر می کنند، کمک کند.
References
Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 53(1), 65–96.
Barraclough, R. A., Christophel, D. M., & McCroskey. J. C. (1988). Willingness to communicate: A crosscultural investigation. Communication Research Reports, 5, 187-192.
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43, 60-69.
Burroughs, N. F., & Marie, V. (1990). Communication orientations of Micronesians and American students. Communication Research Reports, 7, 139-146.
Burroughs, N. F., Marie, V., & McCroskey, J. C. (2003). Relationships of self-perceived communication competence and communication apprehension, to willingness to communicate: A comparison of first and second languages in Micronesia. Communication Research Report, 20(3), 230-239.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493.
Cetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University: Columbus, Ohio.
Clevenger, T., Jr. (1959). A synthesis of experimental research in stage fright. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45, 134-145.
Hsu, L. L. (2005). The relationship among teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy behaviors and students’ willingness to speak in English in central Taiwanese college classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oral Roberts University: Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Jung, H. Y., & McCroskey, J. C. (2004). Communication apprehension in a first language and self-perceived competence as predictors of communication apprehension in a second language: A study of speakers of English as a second language. Communication Quarterly, 52(2), 170-181.
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33, 277-292.
Khaki, S. (2013). The relationship between learner autonomy and willingness to communicate (WTC) in Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2 (5),97-109.
Kim, S. J. (2004). Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL (English as a foreign language) students in Korea: WTC as a predictor of success in second language acquisition. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University: Columbus, Ohio.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135-142.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589-607.
MacIntyre, P., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
MacIntyre, P.D., Baker, S.C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001).Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369-388.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.
Matsuoka, R. (2005). Japanese students’ willingness to communicate in English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University: MI.
Matsuoka, R., & Evans, D. R. (2005). Willingness to communicate in the second language. J Nurs Studies NCNJ, 4(1), 3-12.
McCroskey, J. C. (1982). Oral communication apprehension: A reconceptualization. In M. Burgoon & N. E. Doran (Eds.), Communication Yearbook 6 (pp. 136-170). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25.
McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence: Conceptualizations and perspectives. In J. A. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. M. Ayres (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 75-108). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate and its measurement. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Denver, CO.
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1986a). Correlates of willingness to communicate. Paper presented at the Western Speech Communication Association convention, Tucson, AZ.
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1986b). Predictors of willingness to communicate: Implications for screening and remediation. Paper presented at the annual convention of International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 108-113.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1982). The quite zones: Communication apprehension and shyness (2nd ed). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate and interpersonal communication. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129-159). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990a). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In M. Booth-Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition, and anxiety (pp. 19-37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990b). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. The Southern Communication Journal, 56(1), 72-77.
McCroskey, J. C., Burroughs, F., Daun, A., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Correlates of quietness: Swedish and American perspectives. Communication Quarterly, 38(2), 127-137.
McCroskey, J. C., Fayer, J. M., & Richmond, V. R. (1985). Don’t speak to me in English: Communication apprehension in Puerto Rico. Communication Quarterly, 33(3), 185-192.
McCroskey, J. C., Gudykunst, W. B., & Nishida, T. (1985). Communication apprehension among Japanese students in native and second language. Communication Research Reports, 2(1), 11-15.
Mortensen, C., Arntson, P., & Lustig, M. (1977). The measurement of verbal predispositions: Scale development and application. Human Communication Research, 3, 146-158.
Nazari, A., & Allahyar, N. (2012). Increasing willingness to communicate among English as a foreign language (EFL) students: Effective teaching strategies. Investigations in university teaching and learning, 8, 18-29.
Phillips, G. M. (1968). Reticence: Pathology of the normal speaker. Speech Monographs, 35, 39-49.
Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. (1991). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, introversion, and self-reported communication competence: Finnish and American comparisons. Communication Research Reports, 8, 55-64.
Savignon, S. J. (2005). Communicative language teaching: Strategies and goals. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 635-652). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Weaver, C. (2009). Trends in research on willingness to communicate. In A. M. Stoke (Ed.), JALT2008 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66.
Yu, M. (2008). Willingness to communicate of foreign language learners in a Chinese setting. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Paper 887.
