A Comparative Study of the Effects of Interactive Versus Individual Performance Tasks on EFL Learners’ Speaking Skill
محورهای موضوعی : language teaching
رویا خوئی
1
,
احسان ذولفقاری یونسی
2
1 - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران شمال
2 - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشکده زبانهای خارجی، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی
کلید واژه: speaking, Interactive Tasks, TBLT, Communicative Tasks, Individual Tasks,
چکیده مقاله :
Interaction has always been viewed as a key element in developing the knowledge of an L2 and establishing dynamic communicative episodes. However, it is not always materialized in foreign language learning contexts where access to English speakers is limited. Hence, this study investigated the effects of employing interactive and individual performance tasks on Iranian male EFL learners’ speaking ability. The participants were 32 homogeneous upper-intermediate EFL learners in two intact classes, randomly assigned to two experimental groups. The first experimental group performed problem-solving, reasoning-gap, and opinion-gap tasks individually, and the second group employed problem-solving, reasoning-gap, and information-gap tasks through team-work for 16 sessions. Two speaking pre- and post-tests were administered to evaluate the participants’ oral performance before and after the treatment. The statistical analysis of the data showed no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups on the speaking post-test, indicating that neither form of performance was superior to the other in the process of developing L2 oral proficiency. However, the results of two paired samples t-tests demonstrated that the learners’ speaking skill had significantly improved in both groups at the end of the experiment. Therefore, the researchers concluded that a careful execution of individual performance tasks in the absence of interaction could also contribute to developing speaking an L2.
Interaction has always been viewed as a key element in developing the knowledge of an L2 and establishing dynamic communicative episodes. However, it is not always materialized in foreign language learning contexts where access to English speakers is limited. Hence, this study investigated the effects of employing interactive and individual performance tasks on Iranian male EFL learners’ speaking ability. The participants were 32 homogeneous upper-intermediate EFL learners in two intact classes, randomly assigned to two experimental groups. The first experimental group performed problem-solving, reasoning-gap, and opinion-gap tasks individually, and the second group employed problem-solving, reasoning-gap, and information-gap tasks through team-work for 16 sessions. Two speaking pre- and post-tests were administered to evaluate the participants’ oral performance before and after the treatment. The statistical analysis of the data showed no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups on the speaking post-test, indicating that neither form of performance was superior to the other in the process of developing L2 oral proficiency. However, the results of two paired samples t-tests demonstrated that the learners’ speaking skill had significantly improved in both groups at the end of the experiment. Therefore, the researchers concluded that a careful execution of individual performance tasks in the absence of interaction could also contribute to developing speaking an L2.
Aubrey, S., King, J., & Almukhaild, H. (2020). Language learner
engagement during speaking tasks: A longitudinal study. RELC
Journal, 53(3), 519-533. doi:10.1177/0033688220945418.
Baleghizadeh, S., & Asadi, R. (2013). The Effect of Task Repetition and Task
Recycling on EFL Learners' Oral Performance. Issues in Language
Teaching (ILT), 2(2), 137-163.
Brand, C., & Götz, S. (2013). Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken
learner language. Benjamins Current Topics, 52, 117-137.
Bygate, M. (2020). Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a
real-world project. Language Teaching, 53(3), 275-288. doi:10.1017/
s0261444820000014.
Chen, B., & Zhang, Y. (2015). An experimental study on task-based
interaction in improving college Students’ English-speaking
ability. International Journal of Information and Education
Technology, 5(8), 609-614. doi:10.7763/ijiet. 2015.v5.577.
Chen, W. (2016). The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning
opportunities. ELT Journal, 71(3), 329–340. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw075.
Chen, W. (2019). Patterns of pair interaction in communicative tasks: The
transition process and effect on L2 teaching and learning. ELT
Journal, 76(2), e6-e6. doi:10.1093/elt/ccz013.
Dorathy, A., & Mahalakshmi, S. (2016). Task-based language teaching -A
powerful approach for maximizing learning and teaching in L2 acquisition. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and
Humanities, 6(7), 1822. doi:10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00546.3.
East, M. (2017). Research into practice: The task-based approach to
instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 50(3), 412-
424. doi:10.1017/s026144481700009x.
Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching
forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507-526.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford
University Press.
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effects of careful within-task planning on
oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.) Planning and Task
Performance in a Second Language (pp. 167-192). Philadelphia: John
Benjamins Publishing.
Erten, İ. H., & Altay, M. (2009). The effects of task-based group activities on
students’ collaborative behaviors in EFL speaking classes. Journal of
Theory & Practice in Education (JTPE), 5(1), 33-52.
Erlam, R. (2015). ‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing
language tasks. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 279-299.
doi:10.1177/1362168814566087.
Falla, T., Davies, P. A., & Oxford Editors. (2013). Solutions: Upperintermediate: Student book. OUP Oxford.
Geng, X., & Ferguson, G. (2013). Strategic planning in task-based language
teaching: The effects of participatory structure and task type. System,
41(4), 982-993. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.09.005.
Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers' reflections on cooperative
learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education,
26(4), 933-940. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034.
Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Xu, X. (2020). An investigation into EFL learners’
motivational dynamics during a group communicative task: A classroombased case study. System, 89, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2020.102214.
Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., Byrne, D. G., & Scott, R. (1980).
Measuring social relationships, the interview schedule for social
interaction. Psychological Medicine, 10(4), 723-734.
doi:10.1017/s003329170005501x.
Hughes, R., & Reed, B. S. (2016). Teaching and researching speaking (3rd ed.).
Taylor & Francis.Illés, É., & Akcan, S. (2016). Bringing real-life language use into EFL
classrooms. ELT Journal, 71(1), 3-12. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw049.
Kang, S. (2018). The effects of individual vs. collaborative pre-task planning
on Korean middle school learners’ English oral task performance under
different task complexity. Korean Journal of English Language and
Linguistics, 18(3), 306-327. doi:10.15738/kjell.18.3.201809.306.
Karas, M. (2016). Turn-taking and silent learning during open class
discussions. ELT Journal, 71(1), 13-23. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw051.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning.
Oxford University Press.
Liao, G. (2009). Improvement of speaking ability through interrelated
skills. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 11-14. doi:10.5539/elt.v2n3p11.
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group Work, Interlanguage Talk, and
Second Language Acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228.
doi:10.2307/3586827.
Long, M. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language
teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Mayo, M. D. (2007). Investigating tasks in formal language learning.
Multilingual Matters.
Moore, P. J. (2018). Task-based language teaching (TBLT). The TESOL
Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7. doi:10.1002
/9781118784235.eelt0175.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University
Press.
Oliver, R., Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2017). Children working it out together:
A comparison of younger and older learners collaborating in task-based
interaction. System, 69, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.08.001.
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The Impact of Interaction on
Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 737-758.
doi:10.2307/3586992.
Poupore, G. (2016). Measuring group work dynamics and its relation with L2
learners’ task motivation and language production. Language Teaching
Research, 20(6), 719-740. doi:10.1177/1362168815606162.
Rahman, Md. (2010). Teaching Oral Communication Skills: A Task-based
Approach. English for Specific Purposes World, 9(27), 1-11.
Reinders, H. (2009). The effects of task type and instructions on second
language acquisition. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Revesz, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. N. (2014). The effects of complexity,
accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance.
Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828-848. doi:10.1093/applin/amu069.
Rieker, J. (2021). Alison Mackey: Interaction, feedback and task research in
second language learning: Methods and design. Applied Linguistics, 1-
4. doi:10.1093/applin/amu069.
Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y. (2016). Video-based interaction, negotiation for
comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal
study. Language Learning, 67(1), 43-74. doi:10.1111/lang.12184.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language
Learning, 52(1), 119-158. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00179.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The
uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251-274.
doi:10.1177/136216880000400304.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based
instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-401. doi:10.1093/applin/ami013
Thornbury, S., & Slade, D. (2006). Conversation: From description to
pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
Ulla, M. B. (2020). Students’ speaking motivation and their perspectives on
a task-based language classroom: Pedagogical implications. The Journal
of AsiaTEFL, 17(2), 681-688. doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.2.26.681.
Van Batenburg, E. S., Oostdam, R. J., Van Gelderen, A. J., & De Jong, N. H.
(2016). Measuring L2 speakers’ interactional ability using interactive speech
tasks. Language Testing, 35(1), 75-100. doi:10.1177/ 02655322 16679452.
Yeh, H. C., Chang, W. Y., Chen, H. Y., & Heng, L. (2021). Effects of
podcast-making on college students’ English-speaking skills in higher
education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5),
2845-2867. doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10026-3.
Zarrinabadi, N., Lou, N. M., & Shirzad, M. (2021). Autonomy support predicts
language mindsets: Implications for developing communicative competence
and willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms. Learning and
Individual Differences, 86, 1-8. doi: 10.1016 / j.lindif.2021.101981.
Zolghadri, M., Jafari, S., & Izadpanah, S. (2020). The Effect of Self/Pair
Vs. Teacher Correction and Task Repetition on Individual and Pair
Written Performance. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 17, 1-33.doi:10.30397
/tjtesol.202004_17(1).0001.
