طراحی مدل هوشمند آموزش معماری بومی با رویکرد ساخت گرایی (تمرکز: یادگیری مبتنی بر واقعیت مجازی)
محورهای موضوعی : مجله فناوری اطلاعات در طراحی مهندسی
مصطفی ازقندی
1
(گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران)
مهدی یعقوبی
2
()
الهام فریبرزی
3
(گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران)
کلید واژه: فناوری‌آموزشی, واقعیت‌مجازی, آموزش معماری, معماری بومی پایدار, مدل‌سازی هوشمند,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر از طریق مدل‌سازی سه‌بعدی معماری بومی ایرانی-اسلامی در بستر واقعیت مجازی و افزوده، اقدام به آموزش اصول پایداری به دانش‌آموزان مقاطع متوسطه نموده است. پس از شناسایی و تبیین مولفه‌های معماری بومی و تعیین عوامل موثر در فرآیند آموزش آن از طریق مرور نظامند ادبیات تحقیق و انجام مصاحبه با طیف وسیعی از خبرگان حوزه پژوهش، در گام بعدی و با استفاده از یک مدل آموزشی مبتنی بر رویکرد ساخت‌گرایی، ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ﭘﺎﯾﺪاری معماری بومی ایرانی-اسلامی ﺑﺎ دانش‌آموزان ﺑﻪ اﺷﺘﺮاک گذاشته شده است. این برنامه آموزشی از یک مدل سه مرحله‌ای (معرفی، تمرین، تولید) و با بهره‌گیری از ﺳﻪﺑﻌﺪیﺳﺎزی نوآورترین معماری‌های بومی تاریخ کشور عزیزمان، یک ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ نوین و جذاب دﯾﺠﯿﺘﺎل در زمینه یادگیری برای توسعه پایدار را در طول سال تحصیلی برای دانش‌آموزان فراهم نموده است. درنهایت و در گام آخر پژوهش، به منظور تعیین میزان بهبود درک دانش‌آموزان از مفاهیم مرتبط با اصول پایداری و معماری بومی، از ابزار پرسشنامه با تعیین روایی و پایایی مطلوب استفاده شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که مدل‌سازی سه‌بعدی بر افزایش آشنایی داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان از ویژگی‌های معماری بومی ایرانی-اسلامی و میزان ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮات داﻧﺶ، رﻓﺘﺎر و آﮔﺎﻫﯽ آنان از ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ مرتبط با ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﺪار و اصول ﭘﺎﯾﺪاری موثر بوده است.
The current research aims to teach the principles of sustainability to high school students through the three-dimensional modeling of native Iranian-Islamic architecture in the context of virtual and augmented reality settings.Therefore, after identifying the components of native architecture and determining the effective factors in its teaching process through a systematic review of the research literature and conducting semi-structured interviews with a wide range of experts in the research field, in the next step and using an educational model based on the constructivist approach, the story of native Iranian-Islamic architecture has been shared with students. Finally and in the last step of the research, in order to determine the degree of improvement of students' understanding of the concepts related to the principles of sustainable development and native architecture, a questionnaire tool was used with the desired validity and reliability. In this context, the findings of the research indicate that the usage of 3D modeling has been effective in increasing students' familiarity with the different characteristics of native Iranian-Islamic architecture and creating the positive changes in their knowledge, behavior and awareness of concepts related to sustainability principles.
]1[ رکن الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا؛ عارف‌نیا، خجسته؛ سجاسی قیداری، حمداله ؛ فیروزنیا، قدیر؛ صادق لو، طاهره؛ دیانی، لیلا و فتاحی، احدالله (1389). راهبردهای توسعه آموزش توسعه پایدار در ایران، ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ پژوﻫﺸﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ-پژوهشی انجمن جفرافیای ایران، دوره جدید، سال ﻫﺸﺘﻢ، شماره 25، صص 67-47.
[2] ضرغامی، اسماعیل؛ خاکی، علی و سادات، سیده اشرف (1394). بررسی تطبیقی معماری پایدار و مطابقت آن با معماری بومی خانه های سنتی در شهر ایرانی- اسلامی، نشریه معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، دوره 3، شماره 1، صص:30-15.
[3] یوسفی مقدم، الهام (1392). معماری بومی ایرانی با نگرشی اسلامی، اولین همایش ملی معماری، مرمت، شهرسازی و محیط زیست پایدار، همدان،https://civilica.com/doc/263272
[4] Curl, J. S. (2006). A dictionary of architecture and landscape architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[5] Salman, M. (2018). Sustainability and vernacular architecture: Rethinking what identity is—In Hmood, K, Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation within Sustainability. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/64381
[6] Kazimee, B. A. (2008). Learning from vernacular architecture: Sustainability and cultural conformity. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 113, 12. doi:10.2495/ARC080011
[7] Jahanara, A.; Javadi Eshkalak, N.; Shahidipour, S. M. & Karimizadeh, A. H. (2014). Vernacular architecture as a strategy: Toward sustainable building design. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), 3 (6), 1726- 1734.
[8] Nguyen, A. T.; Truong, N. S. H.; Rockwood, D. & Tran Le, A. D. (2019). Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in different regions across the world: A comprehensive synthesis and evaluation. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8, 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.07.006
[9] Ozorhon, G. & Ozorhon I. F. (2020). Learning from vernacular architecture in architectural education. Megaron, 15 (4), 553-564. doi: 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.54036
[10] Biradar V. K. & Mama, Sh. (2017). Vernacular architecture: A sustainable approach. In Seta, F.; Biswas, A.; Khare, A. & Sen, j. Understanding built environment: Proceedings of the National Conference on Sustainable Built Environment 2015. pp. 125-137. Springer.
[11] Kırbaş, B. & Hızlı, N. (2016). Learning from vernacular architecture: Ecological solutions in traditional Erzurum houses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 788-799. Urban Planning and Architecture Design for Sustainable Development, UPADSD 14- 16 October 2015.
[12] Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M. (1997). Vernacular architecture education in the Islamic society of Saudi Arabia: Towards the development of an authentic contemporary built Environment. Habitat Intl., 21 (2), 229-253.
[13] Asquith, L. & Vellinga. M. (2006). Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century: Theory, education, and practice. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1-20
[14] Zawacki-Richter, O. & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in computers and education. Computers and Education, 122, 136-152.
[15] Radianti, J.; Majchrzak, T. A.; Fromm, J. & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
[16] Ebinger, F.; Buttke, L. & Kreimeier, J. (2022). Augmented and virtual reality technologies in education for sustainable development: An expert-based technology assessment. Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 31 (1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.31.1.28
[17] Fernandez, G. & Maione, C. (2019). SDGs VR-Play for KIDS: An education experience on local sustainable solutions using virtual reality to target vulnerable children. International Conference on Sustainable Development (ICSD).
[18] Al-Ansi, A. M.; Jaboob, M.; Garad, A. & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532
[19] Phakamach, P.; Senarith, P. & Wachirawongpaisarn, S. (2022). The Metaverse in education: The future of immersive teaching and learning. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 3 (2), 75-88.
[20] Sun, J. C. Y.; Ye, S. L., Yu, S. J. & Chiu, T. K. (2022). Effects of wearable hybrid AR/VR learning material on high school students’ situational interest, engagement, and learning performance: The case of a physics laboratory learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-12.
[21] Childs, E.; Mohammad, F.; Stevens, L.; Burbelo, H.; Awoke, A.; Rewkowski, N. & Manocha, D. (2021). An overview of enhancing distance learning through augmented and virtual reality technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11000.
[22] Youngblut, C. (1998). Educational uses of virtual reality technology. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA Document D-2128).
[23] Merchant, Z.; Goetz, E. T.; Cifuentes, L.; Keeney-Kennicutt, W. & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 70, 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
[24] Ling, H. (2017). Augmented reality in reality. IEEE Multimed, 24, pp. 10-15.
[25] Wang, X. (2012). Augmented reality: A new way of augmented learning. eLearn, 1.
[26] Abad-Segura, E.; González-Zamar, M.; Luque-de la Rosa, A. & Morales Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Sustainability of educational technologies: An approach to augmented reality research. Sustainability, 12, 4091. doi:10.3390/su12104091
[27] Aksel Stenberdt, V. & Makransky, G. (2023). Mastery experiences in immersive virtual reality promote pro-environmental waste-sorting behavior. Computers and Education, 198, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104760
[28] Biocca, F. & Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. In Communication in the age of virtual reality. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 57-124
[29] Hedberg, J. & Alexander, S. (1994). Virtual reality in education: Defining researchable issues. Educational Media International, 31 (4), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952398940310402
[30] Petersen G. B.; Petkakis, G. & Makransky D. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers and Education, 179, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
[31] Villena-Taranilla, R.; Tirado-Olivares, S.; C´ozar-Guti´errez, R. & Gonz´alez-Calero, J. A. (2022). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K-6 education: A meta analysis. Educational Research Review, 35. Article 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100434
[32] Pellas, N.; Mystakidis, S. & Kazanidis, I. (2021). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Reality, 25, 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00489-9
[33] Di Natale, A. F.; Repetto, C.; Riva, G. & Villani, D. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A 10-year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 2006–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
[34] Ifanova; Jessicaa, P.; Salima, S.; Edo Syahputraa, M. & Andam, P. (2022). A Systematic literature review on implementation of virtual reality for learning. Procedia Computer Science, 216 (2023), 260–265, 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence
[35] Al Farsi, Gh.; Bin Mohd Yusof, A.; Jumani Binti Fauzi, W.; Ezanee Bin Rusli, M.; Iqbal Malik, S.; Tawafak, R. M.; Mathew, R. & Jabbar, J. (2021). The practicality of virtual reality applications in education: Limitations and recommendations. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48 (7), 142–155.
[36] Jiang, L. (2021). Virtual reality action interactive teaching artificial intelligence education system. Hindawi Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5553211
[37]Chavez, B. & Bayona, S. (2018). Virtual reality in the learning process: Trends and advances in information systems and technologies, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1345-1356.
[38] Alanazi, A. (2016). A critical review of constructivist theory and the emergence of constructionism. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (ARJHSS), 2, 1-8, doi: 10.21694/2378-7031.16018
[39] Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research and Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5 (6), 66-70. ISSN: 2320–737X
[40] Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, Socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 21-23.
[41] Khalifa, M. & Shen, N. (2004). System design effects on social presence and telepresence in virtual communities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2004, 547-558. 12-15 Dec., Washington, ICIS, USA.
[42] Martín-Gutiérrez, J.; Mora, C. E.; Añorbe-Díaz, B. & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13 (2), 469–486.
[43] Cox, E. (2019). Experiential learning and learning styles. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.175
[44] Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Experiential learning theory. Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning: Springer, pp. 1215-1219.
[45] Cantor, J. (1995). Experiential learning in higher education: Linking classroom and community. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (7).
[46] Austin, M. J. & Zeh Rust, D. (2015). Developing an experiential learning program: Milestones and challenges. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27 (1), 143-153. ISSN 1812-9129
[47] McKeachie, W. J. (2005). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, theory for college, and university teachers (11th ed.). Boston: MA: Houghton Mifflin.
[48] Hus, V.; Aberšek, B. & Jančič, P. (2014). Attitudes of primary education students in slovenia and slovakia towards the constructivist approach to primary science education. Journal of Education and Training, 1 (2), 302-320. doi:10.5296/jet.v1i2.6018
[49] Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3 (4), 193-206.
[50] Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
[51] Markula, A. & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
[52] Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. CA: Autodesk Foundation. Available http://www.bie.org/object/document/a_review_of_research_on_project_based_learning. Accessed 30 August 2019.
[53] Condliffe, B.; Quint, J.; Visher, M. G.; Bangser, M. R.; Drohojowska, S.; Saco, L. & Nelson, E. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review. MDRC: Working Paper. https://www.mdrc.org/publication/project-based-learning. Accessed 31 May 2021.
[54] Parker, W. C.; Lo, J.; Yeo, A. J.; Valencia, S. W.; Nguyen, D.; Abbott, R. D. & Vye, N. J. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research, 50 (6), 1424–1459. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213504237
[55] Guo, P.; Saab, N.; Post, L. S. & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586.
[56] Balemen, N. & Özer Keskin, M. (2018). The effectiveness of project-based learning on science education: A meta-analysis search. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5 (4), 849-865. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/452/297.
[57] Sasson, I.; Yehuda, I. & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001
[58] Kaldi, S.; Filippatou, D. & Govaris, C. (2011). Project-based learning in primary schools: Effects on pupils' learning and attitudes. Education 3-13, 39 (1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270903179538
[59] Otake, M.; Fukano, R.; Sako, S.; Sugi, M.; Kotani, K.; Hayashi, J.; Noguchi, H.; Yoneda, R.; Taura, K., Otsu, N. & Sato, T. (2009). Autonomous collaborative environment for project-based learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57 (2), 134-138. [60] Hanney, R. & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). The problem of projects: Understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. London Review of Education, 11 (1), 7-19. King, A. (1993) 'From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side'. College Teaching, 41 (1). pp 30-35.
[61] Le, T. T. (2018). Project-based learning in the 21st century: A review of dimensions for implementation in university-level teaching and learning. 4th ICEAC International Conference on English Across Cultures. Bali, Indonesia
[62] Derevenskaiaa, O. (2014). Active learning methods in environmental education of students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 101-104.
[63] Hmelo-Silver, C. E.; Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42 (2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
[64] Harmer, N. & Stoke, A. (2014). The benefits and challenges of project-based learning: A literature review. Pedagogic Research Institute and Observatory (PedRIO). Plymouth University.
[65] Stauffacher, M.; Walter, A. I.; Lang, D. J.; Wiek, A. & Schol, R. W. (2006). Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7 (3), 252-275.
[66] لطیفی و همکاران (1397)، شناسایی و تبیین مراحل اجرایی پژوهش با رویکرد دلفی فازی. مهندسی بیوسیستم ایران، دوره49، شماره1، ص 107 الی 120
